Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:26:42.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sounds of Waitakere: Using practitioner research to explore how Year 6 recorder players compose responses to visual representations of a natural environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Linda Locke
Affiliation:
Henderson Valley Primary School, 389 Henderson Valley Rd, West Auckland, New Zealandmilliel@vodafone.ac.nz
Terry Locke*
Affiliation:
Arts and Language Education Department, Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, PB 3105, Hamilton, New Zealandt.locke@waikato.ac.nz
*
Corresponding author: Terry Locke

Abstract

How might primary students utilise the stimulus of a painting in a collaborative composition drawing on a non-conventional sound palette of their own making? This practitioner research features 17 recorder players from a Year 6 class (10–11-year-olds) who attend a West Auckland primary school in New Zealand. These children were invited to experiment with the instrument to produce collectively an expanded ‘repertoire’ or ‘palette’ of sounds. In small groups, they then discussed a painting by an established New Zealand painter set in the Waitakere Ranges and attempted to formulate an interpretation in musical terms. On the basis of their interpretation, drawing on sounds from the collective palette (complemented with other sounds), they worked collaboratively to develop, refine and perform a structured composition named for their chosen painting. This case study is primarily descriptive (providing narrative accounts and rich vignettes of practice) and, secondarily, exploratory (description and analysis leading to the development of hypotheses). It has implications for a range of current educational issues, including curriculum integration and the place of composition and notation in the primary-school music programme.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BARRETT, M. (1998 a) Researching children's compositional processes and products: Connections to music education practice? In Sundin, B., McPherson, G. & Folkestad, G. (Eds.), Children Composing (pp. 1034). Malmö: Malmö Academy of Music, Lund University.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. (1998 b) Children composing: A view of aesthetic decision-making. In Sundin, B., McPherson, G. & Folkestad, G. (Eds.), Children Composing (pp. 5781). Malmö: Malmö Academy of Music, Lund University.Google Scholar
BEANE, J. (1995) Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616622.Google Scholar
BOYD, B. (2009) On the Origin of Stories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRAUN, V. & CLARKE, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURNARD, P. (2000) How children ascribe meaning to improvisation and composition: Rethinking pedagogy in music education. Music Education Research, 2, 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURNARD, P. & YOUNKER, B. (2002) Mapping pathways: fostering creativity in composition. Music Education Research, 4, 245261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURNARD, P. & YOUNKER, B. (2008) Investigating children's musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: an application of Engeström's Activity Theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 6074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLAXTON, G. (2000) The anatomy of intuition. In Atkinson, T. & Claxton, G. (Eds.), The Intuitive Practitioner: On the Value of not always Knowing what One is Doing (pp. 3252). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
COCHRAN-SMITH, M. & DONNELL, K. (2006) Practitioner inquiry: blurring the boundaries of research and practice. In Green, J., Camilli, G. & Elmore, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research (pp. 503–518).Google Scholar
COCHRAN-SMITH, M. & LYTLE, S. (1993) Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
COHEN, L., MANION, L. & MORRISON, K. (2005) Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
DOLLOFF, L. (2005) Elementary music education: building cultures and practices. In Elliott, D. (Ed.), Praxial Music Education: Reflections and Dialogues (pp. 281296). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FARRIS, D. (2004) Review: Morton Subotnick's Making Music. Retrieved 22 October 2009 from the Golden Triangle PC Club website at http://www.gtpcc.org/gtpcc/makingmusic.htm.Google Scholar
FELDSTEIN, S. (2001) Music education and technology: Past, present, and future. Teaching Music, 9 (3), 2630.Google Scholar
HARVEY, B. & HARVEY, T. (2006) Waitakere Ranges: Ranges of Inspiration. Waitakere City: The Waitakere Ranges Protection Society Inc.Google Scholar
KEMMIS, S. & MCTAGGART, R. (Eds.) (1988) The Action Research Planner. Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
KOCH, K. (1973) Rose, Where Did You Get That Red? New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
LOCKE, T. (2010) Minding the aesthetic: the place of the literary in education and research. Waikato Journal of Education, 15 (3), 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOCKE, T. (2011) Critical literacy as an approach to literary study in the multicultural, high-school classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10 (1), 119139.Google Scholar
MCCARTHY, M. & GOBLE, J. (2005) The praxial philosophy in historical perspective. In Elliott, D. (Ed.), Praxial Music Education: Reflections and Dialogues (pp. 1951). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MARSHALL, J. (2005) Connecting art, learning, and creativity: a case for curriculum integration. Studies in Art Education, 46, 227241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILLS, J. (2005) Music in the School. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
NEW ZEALAND GEOGRAPHIC/SOUNZ (2007) Sound Barrier (Double CD). New Zealand Geographic/SOUNZ.Google Scholar
PAYNTER, J. (2000) Making progress with composing. British Journal of Music Education, 17, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHILLIPS, K. (2008) Exploring Research in Music Education and Music Therapy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
PLUMMERIDGE, C. (1999) Aesthetic education and the practice of music teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REGELSKI, T. (1998) The Aristotelian bases of praxis for music and music education as praxis. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 6, 2259.Google Scholar
RICHARDSON, L. & ST. PIERRE, E. (2005) Writing: a method of inquiry. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edn.) (pp. 959978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
ROOT-BERNSTEIN, R. (1996) The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In Tauber, A. (Ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science (pp. 4982). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
ROOT-BERTSTEIN, R. (2003) The art of innovation: polymaths and universality of the creative process. In Shavinina, L. (Ed.), The International Handbook On Innovation (pp. 267278). New York: Pergamon Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SARGEANT, P. (1971) Recorders in the classroom. In D. Symons (Ed.), Report of Proceedings of the Second National Conference: New Perspectives in Music Education. Nedlands, WA: Australian Society for Music Education with assistance from the Australian Council for the Arts (pp. 131–134). Retrieved 5 May 2010 from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=611900497142319;res=IELHSS.Google Scholar
SWANWICK, K. (2001) Musical development theories revisited. Music Education Research, 3, 227242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UPITIS, R. (1992) Can I Play You My Song? The Compositions and Invented Notations of Children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar