Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:09:12.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative study of multilayered nanostructures for enhanced solar optical absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2016

Pabitra Dahal
Affiliation:
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Jeffrey Chou
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, U.S.A.
Yu Wang
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, U.S.A.
Sang Gook Kim
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, U.S.A.
Jaime Viegas*
Affiliation:
Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Abstract

Improved solar spectrum optical absorption in multilayered nanostructures consisting of metal, semiconductor and dielectric layers increase their potential for efficient photon to electron conversion. In this work, we analyze the influence of different nanostructure shapes and dimensions on the optical absorption in the vacuum wavelength range of 400 nm to 1500 nm based on Finite Domain Time Difference (FDTD) method. A periodic metallic photonic crystal composed of nanorods of gold, titanium oxide, and alumina is proposed by optimizing thickness of Au and TiO2, aspect ratio, sidewall angle, and geometry of the elemental shape. A high aspect ratio structure consisting of elliptical nose cone elements with optimized dimensions is seen to absorb more than 90% of the solar spectrum in the range considered.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fujishima, A. and Honda, K.. "TiO2 photoelectrochemistry and photocatalysis," Nature 238.5358, pp 3738 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashimoto, K., Irie, H. and Fujishima, A., “TiO2 Photocatalysis: A Historical Overview and Future Prospects,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 82698285, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D., Liu, Y., Yu, B., Zhou, F. and Liu, W.“TiO2 Nanotubes with Tunable Morphology, Diameter, and Length: Synthesis and Photo-Electrical/Catalytic Performance,” Chemical material 21 (7), pp. 11981206, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavero, C., “Plasmon-induced hot-electron generation at nanoparticle/metal-oxide interfaces for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 95103, Feb. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, J. B., Fenning, D. P., Wang, Y., Polanco, M. A. M., Hwang, J., Sammoura, F., Viegas, J., Rasras, M., Kolpak, A., Shao-Horn, Y. and Kim, S.-G., “Broadband Photoelectric Hot Carrier Collection with Wafer-Scale Metallic-Semiconductor Photonic Crystals,” 42nd IEEE PVSC Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 2015Google Scholar
Warren, S. C. and Thimsen, E., “Plasmonic solar water splitting,” Eenrgy & Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5133–5126, Jan. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar