Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:20:29.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simulation of a single dopant nanowire transistor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2013

Asen Asenov
Affiliation:
Device Modeling Group, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT, Glasgow, UK Gold Standard Simulations, Ltd., G12 8LT, Glasgow, UK
Vihar Georgiev
Affiliation:
Device Modeling Group, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT, Glasgow, UK
Get access

Abstract

Nowadays the silicon technology is capable of delivering sub-10 nm devices where ‘every atom counts’. Manipulation of atoms with high precision on such a scale, in principle, can lead to technological innovations, such as transistors with extremely short gate length, quantum computing components and optoelectronic devices. One possible strategy to create this next generation of devices is to precisely place individual discrete dopants (such as phosphorous atoms) in a nanoscale transistor.

In this paper, we report a systematic study of quantum transport simulation of an impact that precisely positioned dopants have on the performance of ultimately scaled gate-all-around silicon nanowire transistors (SNWT) designed for digital circuit applications. Due to strong inhomogeneity of self-consistent electrostatic potential, a full 3-D real-space Non Equilibrium Green’s Function (NEGF) formalism is used. The simulations are carried out for an n-channel NWT with a 2.2 x 2.2 nm2 cross-section and a 6 nm channel length, where locations of precisely arranged dopants in the source drain extensions and in the channel region have been varied. The individual dopants act as localized scatters and, hence, impact of electron transport is directly correlated to the position of the single dopants. As a result, a large variation in the ON-current and modest variation of the subthreshold slope are observed in the ID-VG characteristics when comparing devices with microscopically different discrete dopant configuration. Introducing of channel surface roughness in the Ch Sym 1 wire induces a threshold voltage shift and ON-current variation in the device due to scattering. The variations of the current-voltage characteristics are analyzed with reference to the behaviour of the transmission coefficients. Our calculations provide guidance for a future development of the next generation components with sub-10 nm dimensions for the semiconductor industry.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Frank, D. J., Dennard, R. H., Nowak, E. J., Solomon, P. M., Taur, Y. and Wong, H-S. P., Proc. IEEE 89, 259 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. J., McCamey, D. R., Eriksson, M. A. and Lyon, S. A., Nature 479, 345 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenraad, P. M. and Flatte, M.E., Nature Mater. 10, 91 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuechsle, M., Miwa, J. A., Mahapatra, S., Ryu, H., Lee, S., Warschkow, O., Hollenberg, L. C. L., Klimeck, G. and Simmons, M. Y., Nature Nanotech. 7, 242 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N., Agawal, A., Lakshmi, L. K., Liow, T-Y. Y., Yang, R., Rustagi, S. C., Tung, C. H., Kumar, R., Quang, G. Q., Balasubramanian, N., Kwong, D. L. L., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 27, 383 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. C., Tettamanzi, G. C., Alves, A. D. C., Thompson, S., Yang, C., Verduijn, J., Mol, J. A., Vinet, M., Sanquer, M., Rogge, S. and Jamieson, D. N., Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 264102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, A., Seoane, N., Brown, A. R., Barker, J. R. B. and Asenov, A., IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 8, 603 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, A., Seoane, N., Brown, A. R., Barker, J. R. B. and Asenov, A., IEEE Trans, Elec. Dev. 57, 1626 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seoane, N., Martinez, A., Brown, A. R., Barker, J. R. B. and Asenov, A., IEEE Trans, Elec. Dev. 56, 1388 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, A., Aldegunde, M., Seoane, N., Brown, A. R., Barker, J. R. B. and Asenov, A., IEEE Elect. Dev. 58, 2209 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiev, V. P., Towie, E. A., Asenov, A., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. 60, 965 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, R., Philos. Mag. 21, 863 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttiker, M., IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 317 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imry, Y. and Landauer, R., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 306 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwan, K. H., Yeo, K. H., Young, Y., Suk, S.-D., Li, M., Jeong-Min, H., .Min-Sang, S, Kim, D. W., Park, D. G., Hong, B. H., Jung, Y. C. and Hwang, S. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 052 102 (2008)Google Scholar