Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T05:32:34.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical durability of high-level waste glass in repository environment: main conclusions and remaining uncertainties from the GLASTAB and GLAMOR projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

P. Van Iseghem ,
K. Lemmens ,
M. Aertsens ,
S. Gin ,
I. Ribet ,
B. Grambow ,
J.L. Crovisier ,
M. Del Nero ,
E. Curti  and
B. Schwyn
...Show all authors
P. Van Iseghem
Affiliation:
SCK•CEN, Mol, (Belgium)
K. Lemmens
Affiliation:
SCK•CEN, Mol, (Belgium)
M. Aertsens
Affiliation:
SCK•CEN, Mol, (Belgium)
S. Gin
Affiliation:
CEA-Valrhô, Marcoule, (France)
I. Ribet
Affiliation:
CEA-Valrhô, Marcoule, (France)
B. Grambow
Affiliation:
Subatech, Nantes, (France)
J.L. Crovisier
Affiliation:
EOST Centre de Géochimie de la Surface, Strasbourg, (France)
M. Del Nero
Affiliation:
IreS, Strasbourg, (France)
E. Curti
Affiliation:
PSI, Villigen, (Switzerland)
B. Schwyn
Affiliation:
NAGRA, Wettingen, (Swizerland)
B. Luckscheiter
Affiliation:
FZK, Karlruhe, (Germany)
T. McMenamin
Affiliation:
European Commission, Brussels, (Belgium)
Get access

Abstract

This paper reviews the main conclusions of two European Commission funded projects, GLASTAB and GLAMOR, on the durability of HLW glass in geological disposal, and the remaining uncertainties. The progress in GLASTAB relates to the characterization of the alteration layer, the modeling of glass dissolution, the interaction of glass with near field materials, the behaviour of radionuclides, and the calculation of HLW glass dissolution as part of geological disposal. The GLAMOR programme was focused on the decrease of the glass dissolution rate upon achieving silica saturation in solution. Two conclusions from this programme are the importance of the residual rate measured beyond silica saturation and the need to reduce the uncertainties in model parameters. The overall conclusion from the two projects is that strong progress has been achieved on basic dissolution mechanisms and interaction with disposal environments - HLW glass will act as a good barrier to the release of radionuclides in geologic disposal.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 932: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX , 2006 , 95.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Mendel, J.E. Ed, Final Report of the Defense High-Level Waste Leaching Mechanisms Program, PNL-5157, 1984 Google Scholar
2. Lutze, W.E., Silicate Glasses, in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, Lutze, W.E. and Ewing, R.C. Eds, 1988 Google Scholar
3. Cunnane, J.C. Ed, High-Level Waste Borosilicate Glass. A Compendium of Corrosion Characteristics. DOE-EM-0177, 1994 Google Scholar
4. Glass as a Waste Form and Vitrification Technology – Summary of an International Workshop. Publ. National Academic Press, 1996 Google Scholar
5. GLASS. Scientific research for high performance containment. CEA/VALRHO summer session proceedings, 1998 Google Scholar
6. Glass in its Disposal Environment. Proceedings of a Topical workshop. Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol 298 Nos 1,2, (2001)Google Scholar
7. Ribet, I. et al. , GLASTAB – Long term behaviour of glass: improving the glass source term and substantiating the basic hypotheses. Final report to the EC.Google Scholar
8. Iseghem, P. Van et al. , GLAMOR – a critical evaluation of the dissolution mechanisms of high level waste glasses in conditions of relevance for geological disposal. Final report to the EC, in progress.Google Scholar
9. Advocat, T. et al. , Experimental and modelling studies to formulate a nuclear waste glass source term in representative geological disposal conditions. EUR 19120, 1999 Google Scholar
10. Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal, EUR 6871, Ed Simon, R. and Orlowski, S., 1980 Google Scholar
11. Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal, EUR 10163, Ed Simon, R., 1985 Google Scholar
12. Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal, EUR 13389, Ed Cecille, L., 1990 Google Scholar
13. Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal, EUR 17543, Ed McMenamin, T., 1997 Google Scholar
14. Euradwaste '04 “Radioactive Waste Management – Community Policy and Research Initiatives”. EUR 21027, Ed Davies, C., 2004 Google Scholar
15. Valcke, E et al. , CORALUS: an integrated in situ corrosion test on α-active HLW glass, this conferenceGoogle Scholar
16. Nagra : project Opalinius clay – safety report, demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste. Nagra technical report NRB 02-05. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland, 2002.Google Scholar
17. Grambow, B. and Müller, R., First-order dissolution rate law and the role of surface layers in glass performance assessment. J. of Nuclear Materials, 298, (2001), 112–124.Google Scholar
18. Vernaz, E., Gin, S., Jégou, C., Ribet, I., Present understanding of R7T7 glass alteration kinetics and their impact on long-term behavior modeling. Journal of Nuclear Materials 298 (2001), 27–36 Google Scholar
19. Lemmens, K. et al. , Long-term behaviour of nuclear waste glass: improvement of the model and of the source term. Final Report to NIRAS/ONDRAF, in preparation.Google Scholar
20. Ribet, I., Gin, S., Minet, Y., Vernaz, E., Chaix, P., R. Do Quang (2001) Long-term behaviour of nuclear glass: the r(t) operational model. GLOBAL-International conference on: “Back-End of the fuel cycle : from research to solution”,9th-13th September, Paris.Google Scholar
21. Stumm, W. and Morgan, J.J., Aquatic Chemistry, an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters. Socond edition. Publ. Wiley-Interscience. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
22. Frugier, P. et al. , SON68 glass dissolution kinetics at high reaction progress: mechanisms accounting for the residual alteration rate. This conference.Google Scholar
23. Tang, R. and Nancollas, G., New mechanism for the dissolution of sparingly soluble minerals, Pure Appl. Chem. Vol 74, No 10, pp 1851–1857, 2002 Google Scholar