Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:06:18.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Demonstration of 3C-SiC MEMS Structures on Polysilicon-on-oxide Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Christopher Locke
Affiliation:
clocke@mail.usf.edu, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave, ENB 118, Tampa, Florida, 33620, United States
Christopher Frewin
Affiliation:
hlodyn676@msn.com, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
Luca Abbati
Affiliation:
luca.abbati@diei.unipg.it, University of Perugia, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Perugia, Italy
Stephen E. Saddow
Affiliation:
saddow@scholarone.com, University of South Florida, Electrical Engineering, Tampa, Florida, United States
Get access

Abstract

Silicon carbide has robust mechanical, electrical, and chemical properties which make it an attractive material candidate for micro- and nano-electromechanical systems (MEMS and NEMS). 3C-SiC films grown via a polysilicon seed-layer CVD-deposited on an oxide coated (111) Si substrate offers an innovative method to overcome the residual film stress issues associated with 3C-SiC heteroepitaxy and the difficulties of fabricating structures from 3C-SiC films. The oxide plays a dual role by permitting film relaxation with respect to the supporting substrate and functioning as a MEMS release layer, allowing MEMS structures such as cantilevers and diaphragms, to be easily fabricated from the 3C-SiC film. The impact of the oxide layer on the relaxation of the film stress was investigated by comparing direction-sensitive MEMS stress sensors fabricated from 3C-SiC films grown via a polysilicon-on-oxide-coated-substrate and a polysilicon-on-crystalline Si substrate. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis of bridge structures fabricated on the polysilicon-on-oxide substrate revealed evidence of film strain relaxation when compared to bridge structures fabricated on the polysilicon-on-crystalline Si substrate. However, the upward-curled cantilever and comb structures fabricated on both substrates indicate the presence of a strain gradient in the 3C-SiC film grown on both substrates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 McLane, G. F. and Flemish, J.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3755 (1996).Google Scholar
2 Rosli, S. A., Aziz, A. A., and Hamid, H. A., IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, 851 (2006).Google Scholar
3 Beheim, G. M., Evans, L. J., and Gad-el-Hak, M. (ed.), MEMS: Design and Fabrication, Second Edition, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 8–1 (2006).Google Scholar
4 Carter, G., Casady, J. B., Okhuysen, M., Scofield, J. D., and Saddow, S. E., Mater. Science Forum, 338–342, 11491152 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Frederico, S., Hilbert, C., Fritschi, R., Fluckiger, P., Renaud, P., and Ionescu, A. M., The Sixteenth Annual IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 570 (2003).Google Scholar
6 Shimizu, T., Ishikawa, Y., and Shibata, N., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 39, 617 (2000).Google Scholar
7 Myers, R.L., Saddow, S.E., Rao, S., Hobart, K.D., Fatemi, M., and Kub, F.J., Mater. Science Forum, 457–460, 1511 (2004).Google Scholar