Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:23:58.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinvigorating the Concept of a Situation in Situational Judgment Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Nicolas A. Brown ,
Ashley Bell Jones ,
David G. Serfass  and
Ryne A. Sherman
Nicolas A. Brown*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University
Ashley Bell Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University
David G. Serfass
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University
Ryne A. Sherman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Nicolas A. Brown, Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33433. E-mail: nbrown60@fau.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

What is the role of the situation in situational judgment tests (SJTs)? Lievens and Motowidlo (2016) assert that SJTs are somewhat of a misnomer because they do not actually measure how individuals would behave in a given situation per se. According to these researchers, SJTs assess general domain knowledge—whether potential employees recognize the “utility of expressing certain traits” (p. 4). As a result, SJTs map onto personality measures, which are a summary of behavior across time and situations. SJTs provide predictive validity in part because they tap into personality. However, rather than renaming SJTs, it is possible to reintroduce the concept of a situation to provide even greater predictive power. Thus, the goals of this commentary are to (a) clarify what constitutes a situation, (b) describe what SJTs might actually measure, and (c) set forth a path for a taxonomy of workplace situations.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 38 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Funder, D. C. (2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, F., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2016). Situational judgment tests: From measures of situational judgment to measures of general domain knowledge. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 3–22.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). You say the party is dull, I say it's lively: A componential approach to how situations are perceived to disentangle perceiver, situation, and perceiver × situation variance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 519–528.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. N., Sherman, R. A., . . . Funder, D. C., (2014). The Situational Big Eight: Taxonomizing major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2015a). New horizons in research on psychological situations and environments. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2015b). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.Google Scholar
Serfass, D. G., & Sherman, R. A. (2013). Personality and the perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 708–718.Google Scholar
Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 1–14.Google Scholar
Sherman, R. A., Rauthmann, J. F., Brown, N. A., Serfass, D. G., & Jones, A. B. (2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109 (5), 872–888.Google Scholar