Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T20:28:37.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Road to Somewhere: Why Health Reform Happened

Or Why Political Scientists Who Write about Public Policy Shouldn't Assume They Know How to Shape It

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2010

Jacob S. Hacker
Affiliation:
Yale University. E-mail: jacob.hacker@yale.edu

Abstract

Why did comprehensive health care reform pass in 2010? Why did it take the form it did—a form that, while undeniably ambitious, was also more limited than many advocates wanted, than health policy precedents set abroad, and than the scale of the problems it tackled? And why was this legislation, despite its limits, the subject of such vigorous and sometimes vicious attacks? These are the questions I tackle in this essay, drawing not just on recent scholarship on American politics but also on the somewhat-improbable experience that I had as an active participant in this fierce and polarized debate. My conclusions have implications not only for how political scientists should understand what happened in 2009–10, but also for how they should understand American politics. In particular, the central puzzles raised by the health reform debate suggest why students of American politics should give public policy—what government does to shape people's lives—a more central place within their investigations. Political scientists often characterize politics as a game among undifferentiated competitors, played out largely through campaigns and elections, with policy treated mostly as an afterthought—at best, as a means of testing theories of electoral influence and legislative politics. The health care debate makes transparent the weaknesses of this approach. On a range of key matters at the core of the discipline—the role and influence of interest groups; the nature of partisan policy competition; the sources of elite polarization; the relationship between voters, activists, and elected officials; and more—the substance of public policy makes a big difference. Focusing on what government actually does has normative benefits, serving as a useful corrective to the tendency of political science to veer into discussions of matters deemed trivial by most of the world outside the academy. But more important, it has major analytical payoffs—and not merely for our understanding of the great health care debate of 2009–10.

Type
Reflections
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alton L. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, Nancy J. 2005. The Battle for Social Security: From FDR's Vision to Bush's Gamble. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S.. 1963. “Decisions and Non-Decisions.” American Political Science Review 57(3): 632642.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen et al. 2006. “A Theory of Political Parties.” Presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, August 31–September 3.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Smith, Steven S.. 1996. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Paul. 2010. “The Legacy of Billy Tauzin: The White House-PhRMA Deal.” Sunlight Foundation Blog, February 12. (http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/02/12/the-legacy-of-billy-tauzin-the-white-house-phrma-deal/), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Campaign for America's Future. 2007. The Evolution of the Health Care Debate. (http://ourfuture.org/fact-sheets-briefs/evolution-health-care-debate), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Campaign for America's Future. 2008. Health Care for America and the Presidential Candidates' Health Care Plans (http://www.ourfuture.org/health-care-america-and-presidential-candidates-health-care-plans), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Campaign for America's Future. 2009. Public Health Insurance Page (http://ourfuture.org/healthcare/public-health-insurance), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Carroll, Royce, Lewis, Jeff, Lo, James, McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2010. DW-NOMINATE Socres with Bootstrapped Standard Errors. (http://www.voteview.com/dwnomin.htm), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Catanese, David. 2010. “How Bennett got Clubbed.” Politico, May 10. (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37010.html), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). 2010. National Health Expenditures. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census (http://www.cms.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/tables.pdf), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. 2010a. Lobbying Spending Database Health, 2009. (www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indus.php?year=2009&lname=H&id=), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. 2010b. Lobbying Spending Database, Top Industries, 1998–2010. (http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?indexType=i), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. 2010c. Lobbying Spending Database, Top Spenders, 2009 (http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2009&indexType=s), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
CNN. 2009. “Biden cheers deal with hospitals on health care reform.” CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/08/biden.health.care/index.html), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
CNN Opinion Research Corporation. 2010. National survey of Americans' views on healthcare. [March 19–21, 2010] (http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/03/22/rel5a.pdf), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Cohn, Jonathan. 2009a. “Exclusive: Early Cbo Score on Public Plan. It's Good!” The New Republic, The Treatment blog (July 10) (http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-treatment/exclusive-early-cbo-score-public-plan-its-good), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Cohn, Jonathan. 2009b. “How Big Pharma extorted the White House.” Physicians for a National Health Program. (http://www.pnhp.org/news/2009/november/drug_deal.php), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 2009. An Analysis of H.R. 2920, the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2009. Washington, DC. (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/104xx/doc10434/07-14-PAYGO.pdf), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 2010. Manager's Amendment Reconciliation Proposal. Washington, D.C. (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11379/Manager'sAmendmenttoReconciliationProposal.pdf), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Consumer Reports. 2007. “Are You Really Covered?” consumerreports.org (September). (http://www.consumerreports.org/health/insurance/health-insurance-9-07/overview/0709_health_ov.htm), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Cooper, Michael, and Bosman, Julie. 2008. “Parsing McCain on the Democrats' Health Plans.” New York Times, May 3.Google Scholar
Cutler, David. 2007. “Adviser Describes Obama Health Plan.” Blog for Our Future (June 1). (http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/adviser-describes-obama-health-plan), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Eggen, Dan. 2009. “Industry Cash Flowed to Drafters of Reform.” Washington Post, July 21.Google Scholar
Frum, David. 2010. “Waterloo.” Frum Forum (March 21). (http://www.frumforum.com/waterloo), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, John. 2008. “The Obama-Romney-McCain Health Plan.” Health Affairs Blog (November 21). (http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2008/11/21/the-obama-romney-mccain-health-plan/), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Griffin, John D. 2006. “Senate Apportionment as a Source of Political Inequality.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(3): 405432.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 1997. The Road to Nowhere: The Genesis of President Clinton's Plan for Health Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2001. “Medicare Plus: Increasing Healthcare Coverage by Expanding Medicare.” In Covering America: Real Remedies for the Uninsured, eds. Meyer, Jack A. and Wicks, Elliot K.. Washington, DC: Economic and Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2007. “Health Care for America: A proposal for guaranteed, affordable health care for all Americans building on Medicare and employment-based insurance.” Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper No. 180, January 11.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2008a. The Case for Public Plan Choice in National Health Reform. Washington, DC: Institute for America's Future. (http://institute.ourfuture.org/files/Jacob_Hacker_Public_Plan_Choice.pdf?#), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2008b. “Putting Politics First.” Health Affairs 27(3): 718823.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2009a. Health Competition: How to Structure Public Health Insurance Plan Choice to Ensure Risk-Sharing, Cost Control, and Quality Improvement. Washington, DC: Institute for America's Future. (http://www.ourfuture.org/files/Hacker_Healthy_Competition_FINAL.pdf), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2009b. Public Plan Choice in Congressional Health Plans: The Good, the Not-So-Good, and the Ugly. Washington, DC: Institute for America's Future. (http://www.ourfuture.org/files/Hacker_Public_Plan_August_2009.pdf), accessed May 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2009c. “Yes We Can? The Push for American Health Security.” Politics & Society 37(3): 332.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2009. “The Case for Policy-Focused Political Analysis.” Presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, September 3–6.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer—And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Haislmaier, Edmund. 2006. The Significance of Massachusetts Health Reform. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation. (http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2006/04/The-Significance-of-Massachusetts-Health-Reform), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Healthcare for America Now! 2008. Statement of Common Purpose. (http://healthcareforamericanow.org/site/content/statement_of_common_purpose/), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Herzenhorn, David M. 2009. “Lieberman vs. the ‘Public Option’ Patriarch.” New York Times, Prescriptions blog (December 15). (http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/15/lieberman-vs-the-public-option-patriarch/), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Hickey, Roger. 2008. “Health Care for America Now.” Huffington Post (July 7). (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-hickey/health-care-for-america-n_b_111242.html), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1964. “The Paranoid Style in American Politics.” Harper's Magazine (November): 77–86.Google Scholar
Howard, Paul, and Gratzer, David. 2009. “The Road to Rationing: How ‘Medicare Plus’ Will Destroy Private Insurance,” New Atlantis, 24 (Spring).Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010a. Health tracking poll. [January 7–12, 2010]. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8042-C.pdf, accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010b. Health tracking poll. [February 11–16, 2010]. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8051-C.pdf, accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010c. Health tracking poll. [March 10–15, 2010]. http://www.kff.org/kaiserpolls/upload/8058-C.pdf, accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, Robert. 2008. “The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate's ‘Byrd Rule.’Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. (http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL30862_20080320.pdf), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Klein, Ezra. 2009. “‘Even LBJ would be stuck if he drew this hand.’” Washington Post, Economic and Domestic Policy, and Lots of It blog (November 25). (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/even_lbj_would_be_stuck_if_he.html), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2005. “Going to the Mattresses: The History of Filibustering in Congress.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, September 1–4.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Brue I.. 1999. Sizing up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Levundusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Trudy. 1994. “The selling of ‘Clinton lite.’Columbia Journalism Review (March/April): 20–2.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2008. “Supermajority Rule in the Senate.” In Parties and Policies: How the American Government Works, ed. Mayhew, David R.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized Politics: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2010. “Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era.” Perspectives on Politics 8(3): 803824.Google Scholar
Noah, Timothy. 2007. “Edwardscare: A Trojan Horse.” Slate (July 5). (http://www.slate.com/id/2169764), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2010. “Why the ‘Death Panel’ Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate.” The Forum. 8(1) Article 5.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). 2009. OECD Health Data 2009: Statistics and Indicators. (http://www.oecd.org/document/30/0,3343,en_2649_33929_12968734_1_1_1_1,00.html), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Scherer, Michael. 2009. “Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama's ‘Deadly Doctor,’ Strikes Back.” Time, August 12.Google Scholar
Serafini, Marilyn Werber. 2009. “Harry and Louise: The Sequel.” National Journal, July 18.Google Scholar
Stone, Peter H. 2010. “Health Insurers Funded Chamber Attack Ads.” National Journal, Under the Influence blog (January 13). (http://undertheinfluence.nationaljournal.com/2010/01/health-insurers-funded-chamber.php), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven Michael. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Truffer, Christopher J, Keehan, Sean, Smith, Sheila, Cylus, Jonathan, Sisko, Andrea, Poisal, John A., Lizonitz, Joseph, and Clemens, M. Kent. 2010. “Health Spending Projections Through 2019: The Recession's Impact Continues.” Health Affairs 29 (3): 522529.Google Scholar
United States Senate. 2010. Senate Actions on Cloture Motions. (http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/cloture_motions/clotureCounts.htm), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
University of Minnesota. 2009. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. (http://cps.ipums.org/cps/intro.shtml), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Waddington, Lynda. 2009. “Harkin: Think of health care reform as a starter home.” Iowa Independent, December 17.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J., and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 2000. Ending Welfare As We Know It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?Perspectives on Politics 7(4): 731751.Google Scholar
Yglesias, Matthew. 2009. “The Powers That Be.” Yglesias blog (July 28). (http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/07/the-powers-that-be.php), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar
Zernike, Kate, and Thee-Brenan, Megan. 2010. “Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated.” New York Times, April 14.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Eric. 2010. “Obama ropes in Romney on healthcare.” The Hill, Blog Briefing Room, (March 30). (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/89757-obama-ropes-in-romney-on-healthcare), accessed May 15, 2010.Google Scholar