Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:21:05.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sharing risk: the Netherlands' new approach to pensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2008

EDUARD H. M. PONDS  and
BART VAN RIEL
EDUARD H. M. PONDS
Affiliation:
ABP Pension Fund, Tilburg University and Netspar (e-mail: eduard.ponds@apb.nl)
BART VAN RIEL
Affiliation:
SER and Leiden University (e-mail: b.van.riel@ser.nl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The solvency crisis in 2001–2004 urged Dutch pension funds to reconsider their final-pay plans with de facto unconditional indexation. Most pension funds switched to an average-wage plan with solvency-contingent indexation. This pension plan redesign was the outcome of a new compromise between the major stakeholders of Dutch pension funds. The redesign is of interest as it results in a hybrid combination of DB and DC. This new setting indeed greatly improves solvency risk management. Moreover, the new plan structure appears to be welfare-dominant compared to other collective plan settings and individual alternatives, as it improves the conditions for intergenerational risk sharing. However, drawbacks of the new plans are the lack of transparency and potential welfare loss for individuals because of the inherent contingent claim structure of the new plan. Moreover, the plan redesign has led to value redistribution from older to younger plan participants.

Type
Issues and Policy
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 91 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambachtsheer, K. P. (2007) Pension Revolution: A Solution to the Pensions Crisis. Wiley Finance.Google Scholar
Bikker, J. and de Dreu, J. (2007) Operating costs of pension schemes. In Steenbeek, O. W. and van der Lecq, S. G. (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeri, T., Bovenberg, A. L., Coeuré, B., and Roberts, A. (2006) Dealing with the New Giants: Rethinking the Role of Pension Funds. CEPR Geneva Reports on the World Economy.Google Scholar
Cui, J., De Jong, F., and Ponds, E. H. M. (2007) Intergenerational risk sharing in collective pension schemes. Working paper Netspar, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Hills, J. (2006) A new pension settlement for the twenty-first century? The UK Pensions Commission's Analysis and Proposals. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1): 113–132.Google Scholar
Hoevenaars, R. M. and Ponds, E. H. M. (2007) Valuation of intergenerational transfers in funded collective pension schemes. Netspar working paper, forthcoming in Insurance: Mathematics and Economics.Google Scholar
Laboul, A. and Yermo, J. (2006) Regulatory principles and regulation. In Clark, G. L., Munnell, A. H., and Orszag, J. M. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. C. (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, August, 247–257.Google Scholar
Munnell, A. H. (2006) Employer-sponsored plans: the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution. In Clark, G. L., Munnell, A. H., and Orszag, J. M. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Pensions and Retirement Income. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ponds, E. H. M. and van Riel, B. (2007) The recent evolution of pension funds in the Netherlands: the trend to hybrid DB-DC plans and beyond, working paper 2007–9, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (data and trends available on request).Google Scholar
Steenbeek, O. W. and van der Lecq, S. G. (eds) (2007) Costs and Benefits of Collective Pension Systems. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Van Dalen, H. and Henkens, K. (2006) Vertrouwen in pensioenfondsen: wie kennis vermeerdert … Economisch-Statistiche Berichten , pp. 616–618.Google Scholar
Van Riel, B., Hemerijck, A., and Visser, J. (2003) Is there a Dutch way to pension reform? In Clark, G. L. and Whiteside, N. (eds) Pension Security in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Rooij, M., Kool, C., and Prast, H. (2007) Risk-return preferences in the pension domain: are people able to choose? Journal of Public Economics, 91: 701–722.Google Scholar