Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T13:24:29.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sustainable development in the WTO: from mutual supportiveness to balancing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2012

EMILY BARRETT LYDGATE
EMILY BARRETT LYDGATE*
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Candidate, King's College London
*
*Email: emily.lydgate@kcl.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The WTO Secretariat describes sustainable development as a central WTO principle. Relevant international law treaties have declared sustainable development's mutual supportiveness with trade liberalization, and also emphasized the need to balance its ‘pillars’: economic development, often equated with trade liberalization, with environmental conservation and social welfare. While ‘mutual supportiveness’ suggests that sustainable development's environmental and social goals are a side effect of trade liberalization, ‘balancing’ involves weighing these different goals, and prompts the difficult question of which are most important, and who is empowered to decide. This paper traces these two broad theoretical conceptions through WTO legal texts, negotiations and dispute settlement, arguing that they have important pragmatic implications. In particular, to create mutual supportiveness WTO Director-General, Pascal Lamy, has stated the need for adequate domestic policies, suggesting that the WTO should support these. Yet, if they have negative trade impacts, pure ‘sustainable development’ policies may be difficult to balance against the WTO obligation to liberalize trade.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 2012 , pp. 621 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © Emily Barrett Lydgate 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Soybean Association (2011), ‘ASA Expresses Concerns about EU Renewable Energy Directive to USDA and USTR’, press release, 9 March 2011, www.soygrowers.com/newsroom/releases/2011_releases/r030911.htm.Google Scholar
Campins-Eritja, Mar and Joyeeta, Gupta (2004), ‘The Role of “Sustainability Labeling” in the International Law of Sustainable Development’, in Schrijver, Nico and Weiss, Friedl (eds.), International Law and Sustainable Development: Principles and Practice, Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 251–270.Google Scholar
Desmedt, Axel (2001), ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4(3): 441–480.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel (2002), ‘The World Trade Organisation's Legitimacy Crisis’, World Trade Review, 1(1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilf, Meinhard (2001), ‘Power, Rules and Principles – Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4(1): 111.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H.H. (2005), ‘European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and Its Discontent’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., The WTO Case Law of 2002, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (2010), ‘Malaysia Sees Possible WTO Case against EU Palm Oil Limits’, Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, 14(18), http://ictsd.org/i/news/bridgesweekly/76269/.Google Scholar
Kane, Melinda (1999), ‘Sustainability Concepts: From Theory to Practice’, in Köhn, Jorg et al. (eds.), Sustainability in Question: The Search for a Conceptual Framework, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal (2006), ‘The WTO in the Archipelago of Global Governance’, Speech at the Institute of International Studies, Geneva, 14 March 2006, http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl20_e/htm.Google Scholar
Ortino, Federico (2006), ‘Treaty Interpretation and the WTO Appellate Body Report in US–Gambling: A Critique’, Journal of International Economic Law, 9(1): 117.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (1989), 2nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2004), Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organisation – Practice and Procedure, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, David (1995), Sustainable Development: An Introductory Guide, London: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Sampson, Gary P. (2005), The WTO and Sustainable Development, Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory (2003), ‘How to Make the WTO Dispute Settlement System Work for Developing Countries’, ICTSD Issue Paper No. 5, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher D. (1994), ‘Deciphering Sustainable Development’, Chicago–Kent Law Review, 69: 977.Google Scholar
Trachtman, Joel (1997), ‘Trade and … Problems: Problems, Cost–Benefit Analysis, and Subsidiarity’, European Journal of International Law, 9: 32–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1969), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Vienna, 23 May 1969 in 8 International Legal Materials, Article 31(1).Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1987), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (‘Brundtland Report’), Annex to General Assembly document A/42/427, Development and International Cooperation: Environment, 2 August 1987, http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1992a), Division for Sustainable Development, Earth Summit: Agenda 21, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21toc.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (1992b), General Information on Earth Summit, Rio de Janeiro, http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2002), World Summit on Sustainable Development: Plan of Implementation, Division for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POIToc.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2005), General Assembly, ‘World Summit Outcome’, A/60/L.1, 15 September 2005, 12.Google Scholar
Van Damme, Isabel (2009), Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body, International Economic Law Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vranes, Erich (2009), Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory, International Economic Law Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H. (2000), ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’, The Jean Monnet Seminar and Workshop on the European Union, NAFTA and the WTO: Advanced Issues in Law and Policy, Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 9/00.Google Scholar
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (1994) Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation, 14 April 1994, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/issu5_e.htm.Google Scholar
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (1996), United States – Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline (US–Gasoline), Appellate Body Report, WT/DS2/AB/R (29 April 1996), http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm.Google Scholar
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (1999), India – Quantitative Restrictions on Imports of Agricultural, Textile and Industrial Products (India–Quantitative Restrictions), Panel Report, WT/DS90/R (6 April 1999), http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm.Google Scholar
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (2001a), United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (US–Shrimp), Appellate Body Report, WT/DS58/AB/R (15 June 2001), http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm.Google Scholar
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (2001b), Doha Ministerial Declaration, WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, 20 November 2001, http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm.Google Scholar
WTO (2001c) European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products (EC–Asbestos), Panel Report, WT/DS135/R (18 September 2000) and Appellate Body Report, WT/DS135/AB/R (12 March 2001), http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm.Google Scholar
World Trade Organisation (WTO) (2002), Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (Geneva: WTO Secretariat) WT/CTE/W/220/Rev. 1, 20 December 2002.Google Scholar