Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:44:42.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Services liberalization in the new generation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs): how much further than the GATS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2007

MARTIN ROY ,
JUAN MARCHETTI  and
HOE LIM
MARTIN ROY
Affiliation:
Trade in Services Division, WTO Secretariat
JUAN MARCHETTI
Affiliation:
Trade in Services Division, WTO Secretariat
HOE LIM*
Affiliation:
Trade in Services Division, WTO Secretariat
*
Emails: martin.roy@wto.org, juan.marchetti@wto.org, hoe.lim@wto.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper attempts to fill a gap in the trade literature by providing a comprehensive overview of services liberalization commitments in the new generation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) as compared to prevailing GATS commitments and Doha Round offers. The paper reviews the commitments undertaken by 36 WTO Members (counting the EC as one) under mode 1 (cross-border supply) and mode 3 (commercial presence) in 32 PTAs negotiated since 2000. Among other things, the results suggest that, overall, PTA commitments tend to go significantly beyond GATS offers. Countries that have signed PTAs with the United States have made spectacular improvements, but GATS+ commitments are not limited to such agreements. The paper also discusses the potential economic costs arising from these preferential agreements and implications for the role of GATS and for multilateral services negotiations. The paper concludes by exploring possible approaches to overcome the downsides of services PTAs, including suggestions for a more pro-active role for the WTO in the surveillance of these agreements.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 155 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Martin Roy, Juan Marchetti, and Hoe Lim 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlung, Rolf and Martin, Roy (2005), ‘Turning Hills into Mountains? Current Commitments under the GATS and Prospects for Change’, Journal of World Trade, 39(6): 1161–1194.Google Scholar
Antkiewicz, Agata and John, Whalley (2005), ‘China's New Regional Trade Agreements’, World Economy, 28: 10.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jo-Ann and Roberto, Fiorentino (2005), The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, WTO Discussion Paper No. 8.Google Scholar
Evenett, Simon and Michael, Meier (2006), ‘An Interim Assessment of the US Trade Policy of “Competitive Liberalization”’, mimeo, 24 July 2006 (Revised in February 2007; forthcoming in The World Economy).Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Aaditya, Mattoo (2004), ‘Regional Agreements and Trade in Services: Policy Issues’, Journal of Economic Integration, 19(4): 742–779.Google Scholar
Jansen, Marion (2006), ‘Services Trade Liberalization at the Regional Level: Does Southern and Eastern Africa Stand to Gain from EPA Negotiations?’, WTO Staff Working Paper, May, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jara, Alejandro and Carmen, Domínguez (2006), ‘Liberalization of Trade in Services and Trade Negotiations’, Journal of World Trade, 40(1): 113–127.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Juan (2004), ‘Developing Countries in the WTO Services Negotiations’, WTO Staff Working Paper, September 2004.Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya and Sacha, Wunsch-Vincent (2004), ‘Pre-Empting Protectionism in Services: The WTO and Outsourcing’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7: 765–800.Google Scholar
OECD (2002a), ‘Labour Mobility in Regional Trade Agreements’, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2002b), ‘The Relationship Between Regional Trade Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System: Services’, Paris.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin (2003), ‘Implications for the GATS of Negotiations on a Multilateral Investment Framework; Potential Synergies and Pitfalls’, Journal of World Investment, 4(6): 963–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Martin (2005), ‘Audiovisual Services in the Doha Round: Dialogue de Sourds, the Sequel?’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, December 2005, 6(6): 923–952.Google Scholar
Sen, Rahul (2006), ‘“New Regionalism” in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Emerging Regional and Bilateral Trading Arrangements involving ASEAN, China and India’, Journal of World Trade, 40(4): 553–596.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Sherry (2002), ‘Regional Versus Multilateral Liberalisation of Services’, World Trade Review, 1(2): 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thangavelu, S. M. and Mun-Heng, Toh (2005), ‘Bilateral “WTO-Plus” Free Trade Agreements: The WTO Trade Policy Review of Singapore 2004’, World Economy, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States General Accounting Office (2004), ‘International Trade – Intensifying Free Trade Negotiating Agenda Calls for Better Allocation of Staff and Resources’, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-04-233, January 2004.Google Scholar
WTO (2005), International Trade Statistics 2005, Geneva.Google Scholar