Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:27:23.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Production and Disposal of Waste Materials from Gas and Oil Extraction from the Marcellus Shale Play in Pennsylvania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

Kelly O. Maloney  and
David A. Yoxtheimer
Kelly O. Maloney*
Affiliation:
US Geological Survey–Leetown Science Center, Northern Appalachian Research Laboratory, Wellsboro, Pennsylvania
David A. Yoxtheimer
Affiliation:
Penn State Marcellus Center for Outreach and Research, University Park, Pennsylvania
*
Kelly O. Maloney, USGS–Leetown Science Center, Northern Appalachian Research Laboratory, 176 Straight Run Road, Wellsboro, PA 16901; (phone) 570-724-3322ext. 239; (fax)570-724-2525; (e-mail) kmaloney@usgs.gov
Get access

Abstract

The increasing world demand for energy has led to an increase in the exploration and extraction of natural gas, condensate, and oil from unconventional organic-rich shale plays. However, little is known about the quantity, transport, and disposal method of wastes produced during the extraction process. We examined the quantity of waste produced by gas extraction activities from the Marcellus Shale play in Pennsylvania for 2011. The main types of wastes included drilling cuttings and fluids from vertical and horizontal drilling and fluids generated from hydraulic fracturing [i.e., flowback and brine (formation) water]. Most reported drill cuttings (98.4%) were disposed of in landfills, and there was a high amount of interstate (49.2%) and interbasin (36.7%) transport. Drilling fluids were largely reused (70.7%), with little interstate (8.5%) and interbasin (5.8%) transport. Reported flowback water was mostly reused (89.8%) or disposed of in brine or industrial waste treatment plants (8.0%) and largely remained within Pennsylvania (interstate transport was 3.1%) with little interbasin transport (2.9%). Brine water was most often reused (55.7%), followed by disposal in injection wells (26.6%), and then disposed of in brine or industrial waste treatment plants (13.8%). Of the major types of fluid waste, brine water was most often transported to other states (28.2%) and to other basins (9.8%). In 2011, 71.5% of the reported brine water, drilling fluids, and flowback was recycled: 73.1% in the first half and 69.7% in the second half of 2011. Disposal of waste to municipal sewage treatment plants decreased nearly 100% from the first half to second half of 2011. When standardized against the total amount of gas produced, all reported wastes, except flowback sands, were less in the second half than the first half of 2011. Disposal of wastes into injection disposal wells increased 129.2% from the first half to the second half of 2011; other disposal methods decreased. Some issues with data were uncovered during the analytical process (e.g., correct geospatial location of disposal sites and the proper reporting of end use of waste) that obfuscated the analyses; correcting these issues will help future analyses.

Environmental Practice 14:1–10 (2012)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 278 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coleman, J.L., Milici, R.C., Cook, T.A., Charpentier, R.R., Kirschbaum, M., Klett, T.R., Pollastro, R.M., and Schenk, C.J.. 2011. Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Devonian Marcellus Shale of the Appalachian Basin Province, 2011. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2011–3092. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 2 pp. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2011/3092/ (accessed February 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 1971. Pennsylvania Code: Chapter 95—Wastewater Treatment Requirements (amended 1979). Legislative Reference Bureau, Harrisburg; and Fry Communications, Mechanicsburg, PA. http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/025/chapter95/chap95toc.html (accessed May 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Drohan, P., Brittingham, M., Bishop, J., and Yoder, K.. 2012. Early Trends in Landcover Change and Forest Fragmentation due to Shale-Gas Development in Pennsylvania: A Potential Outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians. Environmental Management 49(5):1061–1075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Entrekin, S., Evans-White, M., Johnson, B., and Hagenbuch, E.. 2011. Rapid Expansion of Natural Gas Development Poses a Threat to Surface Waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9(9):503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.S. 1998. Geologic and Geochemical Controls on Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) in Produced Water from Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Operations. Environmental Geosciences 5(3):139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FracFocus: Chemical Disclosure Registry. 2012. Hydraulic Fracturing: The Process. Ground Water Protection Council (GWPC) and Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission (IOGCC), Oklahoma City, OK. http://fracfocus.org/hydraulic-fracturing-how-it-works/hydraulic-fracturing-process (accessed October 19, 2012).Google Scholar
General Assembly of Pennsylvania. 2010, August 5. House Bill No. 381. General Assembly, Harrisbrug, PA, 2 pp Available at http://www.legis.state.pa.us/CFDOCS/Legis/PN/Public/btCheck.cfm?txtType=PDF&sessYr=2009&sessInd=0&billBody=H&billTyp=B&billNbr=0381&pn=4128 (accessed May 12, 2012).Google Scholar
Johnson, N. 2010. Pennsylvania Energy Impacts Assessment: Report 1—Marcellus Shale Natural Gas and Wind. The Nature Conservancy, Philadelphia, 46 pp. Available at http://www.nature.org/media/pa/tnc_energy_analysis.pdf (accessed February 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Kargbo, D.M., Wilhelm, R.G., and Campbell, D.J.. 2010. Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities. Environmental Science & Technology 44(15):5679–5684.Google Scholar
New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). 2011. Revised Draft SGEIS on the Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program (September 2011). Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs. NYSDEC, Albany. Available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/energy/75370.html (accessed April 27, 2012).Google Scholar
Oilnergy.com. N.d.NYMEX Henry-Hub Natural Gas Price. Oilnergy, Austin, TX. http://www.oilnergy.com/1gnymex.htm (accessed May 11, 2012).Google Scholar
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). 2012. PA DEP Oil & Gas Reporting Website: Statewide Data Downloads by Reporting Period. PADEP, Harrisburg. Available at https://www.paoilandgasreporting.state.pa.us/publicreports/Modules/DataExports/DataExports.aspx (accessed March 9, 2012).Google Scholar
Rassenfoss, S. 2011. From Flowback to Fracturing: Water Recycling Grows in the Marcellus Shale. Journal of Petroleum Technology 63(7):48–51. Available at http://www.spe.org/jpt/print/archives/2011/07/12Marcellus.pdf (accessed October 19, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, E.L., Engle, M.A., Kirby, C.S., and Kraemer, T.F.. 2011. Radium Content of Oil- and Gas-Field Produced Waters in the Northern Appalachian Basin (USA): Summary and Discussion of Data. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5135. US Geological Survey Reston, VA, 31 pp. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5135/ (accessed April 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Soeder, D.J., and Kappel, W.M.. 2009. Water Resources and Natural Gas Production from the Marcellus Shale. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009–3032. US Geological Survey, Baltimore, MD. 6 pp. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3032/ (accessed October 12, 2010).Google Scholar
US Department of Energy (USDOE). 2009. Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer. Office of Fossil Energy and National Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, WV, 166 pp. Available at http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/publications/EPreports/Shale_Gas_Primer_2009.pdf (accessed February 16, 2012)Google Scholar
US Energy Information Administration (USEIA). 2012. Annual Energy Outlook 2012 (AEO2012) Early Release Overview. USEIA, Washington, DC, 13 pp. Available at http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/er/ (accessed March 25, 2012).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011, November. Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources. EPA/600/R-11/122. Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Washington, DC, 174 pp. Available at http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/class2/hydraulicfracturing/upload/FINAL-STUDY-PLAN-HF_Web_2.pdf (accessed May 3, 2012).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. Secondary Drinking Water Regulations: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals. USEPA, Washington, DC. http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/secondarystandards.cfm (accessed August 16, 2012).Google Scholar