Cambridge Journals Online

Cambridge Journals Online
Skip to content
Animal Conservation (2003), 6 : 339-346 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © 2003 The Zoological Society of London
doi:10.1017/S136794300300341X
Published online by Cambridge University Press 29 Oct 2003


Detection and accuracy rates of dogs trained to find scats of San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica)


Deborah A. Smith a1c1, Katherine Ralls a2, Aimee Hurt a3, Brice Adams a4, Megan Parker a5, Barbara Davenport a6, M. C. Smith a7 and Jesus E. Maldonado a8
a1 Department of Ecosystem Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington DC 98195, USA
a2 Conservation and Research Center, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC 20008, USA
a3 Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
a4 Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504, USA
a5 Wildlife Biology Program, School of Forestry, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA
a6 PackLeader Dog Training, Steilacoom, Washington DC 98388, USA
a7 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, LaConner, Washington DC 98257, USA
a8 Genetics Program, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC 20008, USA

Article author query
smith da   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
ralls k   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
hurt a   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
adams b   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
parker m   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
davenport b   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
smith mc   [PubMed] [Google Scholar
maldonado je   [PubMed] [Google Scholar

Abstract

Specially trained detection dogs have been used to locate faeces (scats) for faecal analyses but their effectiveness has not been quantified. We evaluated detection and accuracy rates of dogs trained to find scats of endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica). Four dogs found from 0.43 to 5.37 presumptive kit fox scats per km of transect searched in two field sites where kit foxes and coyotes (Canis latrans) but not non-native red foxes (V. vulpes) were present. The unusually low detection rate (0.43 scats per km) by one dog (probably due to excessive panting in hot weather) was still similar to the average scat detection rate of two experienced humans. DNA tests of 1298 scats showed that all dogs were 100% accurate at distinguishing kit fox scats under our field conditions. Because red foxes are sympatric with kit foxes in some areas, we also conducted controlled discrimination experiments to see if trained dogs could distinguish between scats from kit and red foxes. Four dogs were 100% accurate at choosing a kit fox scat when red fox scats were present (n = 64 trials), but were less accurate at ignoring red fox scats in trials where a kit fox scat was absent.

(Received October 21 2002)
(Accepted April 30 2003)


Correspondence:
c1 All correspondence to: Deborah A. Smith. Tel: (206) 543-7232; Fax (206) 543-3254; E-mail: debsmith@u.washington.edu


back to top
Cambridge University Press