Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:13:27.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The representation of English articles in second language grammars: Determiners or adjectives?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

DANIJELA TRENKIC
DANIJELA TRENKIC*
Affiliation:
University of York
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Educational Studies, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UKD.Trenkic.96@cantab.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An article-choice study involving L1 Mandarin/L2 English bilinguals is reported. It tested two recent accounts on the representation of English articles in L2 grammars (where L1 has no articles). The Fluctuation Hypothesis (Ionin, Ko and Wexler, 2004) predicts that L2 speakers will have full access to UG, but will fluctuate between the settings of the postulated Article Choice Parameter; article choices will be influenced by [±specificity]. The syntactic misanalysis account, on which L2 articles are treated as adjectives (Trenkic, 2007), predicts that article choices will be influenced by the objective identifiability of referents. By discussing the notion of specificity and emphasising problems in its operationalisation, the current study introduces an innovative design to reveal that what was previously observed as the effect of specificity on L2 article choices (full UG access) is better described as an effect of the stated/denied familiarity with the referent (an extra-linguistic factor).

Type
Keynote
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by the University of York Vice-Chancellor's Anniversary Lectureship Award to the author, which is gratefully acknowledged. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at a meeting of the Philological Society in London, a seminar to the Department of Language and Linguistics at the University of Essex, and EUROSLA 16 in Antalya. I would like to thank the audiences at these meetings, the three reviewers and the editors for constructive and helpful comments.

References

Bickerton, D. 1981. The roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Y. G. 2002. Second language learners' theories on the use of English articles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. 2004. Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics, 42, 1129–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. L.-S. & Sybesma, R. 1999. Bare and not so bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 509–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, A. 1991. On definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1988. Parametrized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In Flynn, S. & O'Neil, W. (eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, pp. 47–75. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, N. 1992. Left branch extraction. In Broderick, K. (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 22, pp. 67–84. Amherst. MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Crowther, J. (ed.) 1995. Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English (5th edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
du Bois, J. W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, pp. 203–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Enç, M. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 1–25.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. 1993. The later stages in the development of the definite article: Evidence from French. In Andersen, H. (ed.), Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics 1993, pp. 159–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. D. & Sag, I. A. 1982. Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 355–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1981. On the development of one as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica, 2, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L. 2004. Ultimate attainment of L2 inflections: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In Foster-Cohen, S., Ota, M., Smith, M. A. Sharwooddr & Sorace, A. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 4, pp. 119–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J. 2000. The acquisition of the determiner phrase in bilingual and second language French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granfeldt, J. 2004 Domaines syntaxiques et acquisition du français langue étrangère. L'exemple du DP. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère (AILE), 21, 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1978. How does a language acquire gender markers? In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. & Moravcsik, E. A. (eds.), Universals of human language (vol. 3), pp. 47–82. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Trueswell, J. C. 2003. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. 1991. On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality predictions. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 405–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., Al-Eid, S., Almahboob, I., Athanasopoulos, P., Chaengchenkit, R., Hu, J., Rezai, M., Jaensch, C., Jeon, Y., Jiang, A., Leung, I., Mtsunaga, K., Ortega, M., Sarko, G., Snape, N. & Velasco-Zarate, K. 2005. Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers. In Foster-Cohen, S., Krajnovic, M. Medveddr & Djigunovic, J. Mihaljevic (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 6, pp. 7–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C. Y.-H. 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The “failed functional feature hypothesis”. Second Language Research, 13, 187–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. 1999. The evidence for a grammatical category definite article in spoken Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 77–94.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. 1983. A longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.Google Scholar
Ionin, T. 2003. The interpretation of “the”: A new look at article in L2-English. In Beachley, B., Brown, A. & Conlin, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 346–357. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ionin, T. 2006. This is definitely specific: Specificity and definiteness in article systems. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 175–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H & Wexler, K. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T. & Wexler, K. 2003. The certain uses of the in L2-English. In Liceras, M., Zobl, H. & Goodluck, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002): L2 links, pp. 150–160. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Projects.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansed, S. & Hofland, K. 1989. Frequency analysis of English vocabulary and grammar (Based on the LOB corpus) (vol. I): Tag frequencies and word frequencies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kowaluk, A. 2001. The acquisition of pronouns and determiners by Polish L2 learners of English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kuribara, C. 1999. Resettability of a syntactic parameter: Acquisition of category D in English by adult Japanese speakers. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Representation and process: Proceedings of the 3rd Pacific Second Language Research Forum (vol. 1), pp. 13–22. Tokyo: PacSLRF.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Archibald, J. (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, pp. 102–129. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leung, Y. I. 2001. The initial state of L3A: Full transfer and failed features? In Bonch-Bruevich, X., Crawford, W., Hellerman, J., Higgins, C. & Nguyen, H. (eds.), The past, present and future of second language research: Selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum, pp. 55–75. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. G. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Master, P. 1990. Teaching the English articles as a binary system. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosel, U. & Hovdhaugen, E. 1992. Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Parrish, B. 1987. A new look at methodologies in the study of article acquisition for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 37, 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearsal, J. & Trumble, B. (eds.) 1996. The Oxford English reference dictionary (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, E. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given–new information. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics, pp. 223–256. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. 2000. Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 16, 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J. & Matthewson, L. 2005. Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23, 53–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. & Tsimpli, I.-M. 1995. The mind of a savant. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Snape, N., Leung, Y-k. I. & Ting, H-C. 2006. Comparing Chinese, Japanese and Spanish speakers in L2 English article acquisition: Evidence against the Fluctuation Hypothesis? In O'Brien, M. G., Shea, C. & Archibald, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2005), pp. 132–139. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. 1985. Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning, 35, 373–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. 1989. The acquisition of English articles by first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkic, D. 2000. The acquisition of English articles by Serbian speakers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. 2002. Form–meaning connections in the acquisition of English articles. In Foster-Cohen, S., Ruthenberg, T. & Poschen, M. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 2, pp. 115–133. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Trenkic, D. 2004. Definiteness in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian and some implications for the general structure of the nominal phrase. Lingua, 114, 1401–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenkic, D. 2007. Variability in L2 article production: Beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23 (3), 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Roussou, A. 1991. Parameter-resetting in L2? UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 149–169.Google Scholar
White, L. 2003. Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatić, L. 1997. The structure of the Serbian noun phrase. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar