Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:30:10.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Household participation in a Payments for Environmental Services programme: the Nhambita Forest Carbon Project (Mozambique)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2014

Ravi Hegde ,
Gary Q. Bull ,
Sven Wunder  and
Robert A. Kozak
Ravi Hegde
Affiliation:
Horticulture Australia, Economic Analysis, 3 Sligo Place, Prestons, NSW 2170, Australia. Tel: 61-2-98268372. E-mail: rhegde2005@gmail.com
Gary Q. Bull
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. E-mail: gary.bull@ubc.ca
Sven Wunder
Affiliation:
Center for International Forestry Research, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. E-mail: s.wunder@cgiar.org
Robert A. Kozak
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. E-mail: rob.kozak@ubc.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantitative research on household participation in the Payments for Environmental Services (PES) programme remains scarce. This paper aims to determine the key factors influencing household participation in a PES programme in Mozambique. Questionnaire-based quarterly surveys were conducted with 290 randomly selected households. We used the instrumental variables technique to identify the factors influencing household participation. The instrumental variables used for forest dependence were: household head born in the village, duration of residence of the household head in the village, ethnicity of the household head, business ownership of the household head and off-farm income of the household. The results show that education of household head and households' trust towards community members positively influenced household participation in PES, while forest dependence influenced it negatively. Future PES projects may thus need to focus more on developing social capital and the resource dependence of households.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 611 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alon, S. (2007), ‘The influence of financial aid in leveling group differences in graduating from elite institutions’, Economics of Education Review 26: 296–311.Google Scholar
Arriagada, R.A., Sills, E.O., Pattanayak, S.K., and Ferraro, P.J. (2009), ‘Combining qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica's program of payments for environmental services’, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3–5): 343–367.Google Scholar
Balslev, H., Knudsen, T.R., Byg, A., Kronborg, M., and Grandez, C. (2010), ‘Traditional knowledge, use and management of Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) in Amazonian Peru’, Economic Botany 64(1): 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, C.F., Schaffer, M.E., Stillman, S., and Wiggins, V. (2006), ‘Overid: Stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after ivreg, ivreg2, ivprobit, ivtobit, reg3’, [Available at] http://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s396802.htm.Google Scholar
Bennett, M.T. (2008), ‘China's sloping land conversion program: institutional innovation or business as usual?’, Ecological Economics 65(4): 699–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacho, O.J., Marshall, G.R., and Milne, M. (2005), ‘Transaction and abatement costs of carbon sink projects in developing countries’, Environment and Development Economics 10(5): 597–614.Google Scholar
Cavendish, W. (2000), ‘Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe’, World Development 28(11): 1979–2003.Google Scholar
Envirotrade (2010), ‘Sofala community carbon project: project design document according to CCB and Plan Vivo Standards’, London: Envirotrade.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M. (1992), ‘Cash crop production, food price volatility, and rural market integration in the third world’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(1): 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B., Turner, K., Zylstra, M., et al. . (2008), ‘Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research’, Ecological Applications 18(8): 2050–2067.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. (2012), ‘No pay, no care? A case study exploring motivations for participation in payments for ecosystem services in Uganda’, Oryx 46(1): 45–54.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Bull, G., and Baylis, K. (2010), ‘Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: the role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules’, Ecological Economics 69: 1292–1302.Google Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., and Wunder, S. (2005), ‘How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America’, World Development 13(9): 1511–1527.Google Scholar
Hegde, R. (2010), ‘ Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Ecosystem-Services project in Mozambique: a household level analysis ’, PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegde, R. and Bull, G.Q. (2011), ‘Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Ecosystem Services project in Mozambique: a household level analysis’, Ecological Economics 71: 122–130.Google Scholar
Herd, A. (2007), ‘ Exploring the socio-economic role of charcoal production and the potential for sustainable production in the Chicale Regulado, Mozambique ’, MSc dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Houehanou, T.D., Assogbadjo, A.E., Kakai, R.G., Houinato, M., and Sinsin, B. (2011), ‘Valuation of local preferred uses and traditional ecological knowledge in relation to three multipurpose tree species in Benin (West Africa)’, Forest Policy and Economics 13(7): 554–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, B.K., Kousky, C., and Sims, K.R.E. (2008), ‘Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 105: 9465–9470.Google Scholar
Jindal, R., Swallow, B., and Kerr, J. (2008), ‘Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: potential benefits and challenges’, Natural Resource Forum 32(2): 116–130.Google Scholar
Jindal, R., Kerr, J., and Carter, S. (2012), ‘Reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the N'hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique’, World Development 40(10): 2125–2135.Google Scholar
Jumbe, C.B.L. and Angelsen, A. (2007), ‘Forest dependence and participation in CPR management: empirical evidence from forest co-management in Malawi’, Ecological Economics 62(3–4): 661–672.Google Scholar
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997), ‘Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1251–1288.Google Scholar
Kosoy, N., Corbera, E., and Brown, K. (2008), ‘Participation in payments for ecosystem services: case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico’, Geoforum 39: 2073–2083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landell-Mills, N. and Porras, I. (2002), ‘Silver bullet or fool's gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services: market-based mechanisms for conservation and development’, Research Report, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. (1983), Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahanty, S., Suich, H., and Tacconi, L. (2013), ‘Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: lessons from seven PES schemes’, Land Use Policy 31: 38–47.Google Scholar
MEA (2005), Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report, Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Miranda, M., Porass, I., and Moreno, M. (2003), The Social Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica: A Quantitative Field Survey and Analysis of the Virilla Watershed, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J.M., and Braña, J. (2008), ‘Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results’, Ecological Economics 65(4): 725–736.Google Scholar
Nawrotzki, R.J., Hunter, L.M., and Dickinson, T.W. (2012), ‘Rural livelihoods and access to natural capital: differences between migrants and non-migrants in Madagascar’, Demographic Research 26: 661–699.Google Scholar
Newey, W.K. (1987), ‘Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables’, Journal of Econometrics 36: 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nhantumbo, I. and Kowero, G. (2003), ‘A goal programming model for planning management of miombo woodlands’, in Kowero, G., Campbell, B.M. and Sumaila, U.R. (eds), Policies and Governance Structures in Woodlands of Southern Africa, Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1999), ‘Self-governance and forest resources’, Occasional Paper No. 20, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., Landell-Mills, N., and Bishop, J. (2002), ‘Making market-based mechanisms work for forests and people’, in Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., and Landell-Mills, N. (eds), Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., and Platais, G. (2005), ‘Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and evidence to date from Latin America’, World Development 33(2): 237–253.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., Ramirez, E., Gobbi, J., Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., and Ruiz, J.P. (2007), ‘Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua’, Ecological Economics 64(2): 374–385.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., Rios, A.N., and Arcenas, A. (2008), ‘Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua’, Environment and Development Economics 13: 299–325.Google Scholar
Pagiola, S., Rios, A.R., and Arcenas, A. (2010), ‘Poor household participation in payments for environmental services: lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Quindío, Colombia’, Environmental and Resource Economics 47(3): 371–394.Google Scholar
Pattanayak, S.K., Mercer, D.E., Sills, E., and Yang, J. (2003), ‘Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies’, Agroforestry Systems 57: 173–186.Google Scholar
Sah, J.P. and Heinen, J.T. (2001), ‘Wetland resource use and conservation attitudes among indigenous and migrant peoples in Ghodaghodi Lake area, Nepal’, Environmental Conservation 28(4): 345–356.Google Scholar
Singh, I.J., Squire, L., and Strauss, J. (1986), Agricultural Household Models: Extension, Application and Policy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
StataCorp (2010), Stata Statistical Software: Release 10, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
Thoni, C., Tyran, J.B., and Wengström, E. (2012), ‘Micro-foundations of social capital’, Journal of Public Economics 96(7–8): 635–643.Google Scholar
Uchida, E., Xu, J., Xu, Z., and Roselle, S. (2007), ‘Are the poor benefiting from China's land conservation program?’, Environment and Development Economics 12(4): 593–620.Google Scholar
UOE (2008), ‘Miombo community land use and carbon management: Nhambita Pilot Project’, Final Report, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bank, World (1998), ‘The initiative on defining, monitoring and measuring social capital: overview and program description’, Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 1, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. (2005), ‘Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts’, Report, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 42, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. (2006), ‘Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics’, Ecology and Society 11(2): 23.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. (2007), ‘The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation’, Conservation Biology 21(1): 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wunder, S. (2008), ‘Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence’, Environment and Development Economics 13(3): 279–297.Google Scholar
Wunder, S., Luckert, M., and Smith-Hall, C. (2011), ‘Valuing the priceless: what are non-marketed products worth?’,in Angelsen, A., Larsen, H.O., Lund, J.F., Smith-Hall, C. and Wunder, S. (eds), Measuring Livelihoods and Environmental Dependence: Methods for Research and Fieldwork, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Zbinden, S. and Lee, D.R. (2005), ‘Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA program’, World Development 33(2): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, S., Herzfeld, T., Glauben, T., Zhang, Y., and Hu, B. (2008), ‘Factors affecting Chinese farmers' decisions to adopt a water-saving technology’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 56: 51–61.Google Scholar