Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T10:26:58.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An empirical study on effective pollution enforcement in Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2004

SANG MOK KANG
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Pusan National University
MYUNGHUN LEE
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Keimyung University, 1000 Sindang-dong, Dalseo-gu, Daegu, Korea 704-701. Tel.: 011-82-53-580-5597. Fax: 011-82-53-580-5313. E-mail: mhlee@kmu.ac.kr

Abstract

It has been recognized that extra incentives for firms' compliance with pollution regulations would be created under state-dependent enforcement as Harrington (1988) has shown theoretically. However, the extent of the overall improvement in compliance is expected to be different according to the pollution control costs and industrial structures of any given country. This paper empirically examines, for the first time, the effectiveness of an imposition of higher fines for repeated violations and state-dependent enforcement in terms of the reduction of violation days, by simulating emitting behavior for 65 sub-industries in the Korean manufacturing industry over the period 1987–1989. State-dependent enforcement was found to be more effective than an imposition of higher non-compliance fines for repeated violations in regard to the number of sub-industries exhibiting persistent non-compliance. However, the number of fully complying sub-industries was found to be slightly higher under an imposition of higher non-compliance fines for repeated violations. In Korea, it would therefore be desirable to discriminate against certain industries with enforcement systems of different intensity based on their abatement cost structures rather than uniformly introducing a state-dependent approach.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful comments and suggestions, we thank three anonymous referees.