Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:10:32.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Memory interference in multiple sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2005

STEPHANIE Y. GRIFFITHS ,
AIKO YAMAMOTO ,
VANESSA G. BOUDREAU ,
LESLIE K. ROSS ,
ELIZABETH KOZORA  and
ALLEN E. THORNTON
STEPHANIE Y. GRIFFITHS
Affiliation:
Human Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
AIKO YAMAMOTO
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
VANESSA G. BOUDREAU
Affiliation:
Human Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
LESLIE K. ROSS
Affiliation:
Institute for Health and Aging, Department of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California
ELIZABETH KOZORA
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
ALLEN E. THORNTON
Affiliation:
Human Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To explore verbal memory impairments associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), we compared proactive and retroactive interference effects on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT; Delis et al., 1987) in a sample of 83 community-residing individuals with MS and 80 healthy participants. Individuals with MS demonstrated normal accumulation of proactive interference (PI), but attenuated release from PI relative to healthy individuals. Furthermore, accumulation of retroactive interference (RI) at short-delay free recall (SDFR) was intensified for those with MS as compared to healthy participants. Interestingly, accumulation of RI predicted long-term memory (LTM) only for participants with MS. These findings suggest that individuals with MS may experience particular difficulty when required to use semantic properties of information flexibly to facilitate verbal LTM. (JINS, 2005, 11, 737–746.)

Keywords

Verbal learningMemory disordersSemanticsNeuropsychologyCognitionDemyelinating autoimmune diseases
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , October 2005 , pp. 737 - 746
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, D.B. & Gorman, B.S. (1993). Some of the most common questions asked of statistical consultants: Our favourite responses and recommended readings. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 119, 155–186.Google Scholar
Armstrong, C., Onishi, K., Robinson, K., D'Esposito, M., Thompson, H., Rostami, A., & Grossman, M. (1996). Serial position and temporal cue effects in multiple sclerosis: Two subtypes of defective memory mechanisms. Neuropsychologia, 34, 853–862.Google Scholar
Arnett, P.A., Higginson, C.I., & Voss, W.D. (1999a). Depression in multiple sclerosis: Relationship to working memory capacity. Neuropsychology, 13, 546–556.Google Scholar
Arnett, P.A., Higginson, C.I., & Voss, W.D. (1999b). Depressed mood in multiple sclerosis: Relationship to capacity-demanding memory and attentional functioning. Neuropsychology, 13, 434–446.Google Scholar
Arnett, P.A., Rao, S.M., Grafman, J., Bernardin, L., Luchetta, T., Binder, J.R., & Lobeck, L. (1997). Executive functions in multiple sclerosis: An analysis of temporal ordering, semantic encoding, and planning abilities. Neuropsychology, 11, 535–544.Google Scholar
Beatty, W.W. (1993). Memory and “frontal lobe” dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 115(Suppl), S38–S41.Google Scholar
Beatty, W.W., Goodkin, D.E., Beatty, P.A., & Monson, N. (1989). Frontal lobe dysfunction and memory impairment in patients with chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain and Cognition, 11, 73–86.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., & Mendelson, M. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
Belleville, S., Peretz, I., Arguin, M., Fontaine, F., Lussier, I., Goulet, P., & Joanette, Y. (1992). Assessment of semantic processing in patients with Alzheimer's type dementia: The release-of-proactive-inhibition paradigm. Neuropsychology, 6, 29–41.Google Scholar
Binetti, G., Magni, E., Padovani, A., Cappa, S.F., Bianchetti, A., & Trabucchi, M. (1995). Release from proactive interference in early Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 33, 379–384.Google Scholar
Blusewicz, M.J., Kramer, J.H., & Delmonico, R.L. (1996). Interference effects in chronic alcoholism. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 141–145.Google Scholar
Bobholtz, J.A. & Rao, S.M. (2003). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A review of recent developments. Current Opinion in Neurology, 16, 283–288.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., Gates, R., & Roldan, F. (1984). Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychologia, 22, 297–302.Google Scholar
Cermak, L.S., Butters, N., & Moreines, J. (1974). Some analyses of the verbal encoding deficit of alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Brain and Language, 1, 141–150.Google Scholar
Cushman, L.A., Como, P.G., Booth, H., & Caine, E.D. (1988). Cued recall and release from proactive interference in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 685–692.Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. (1987). The California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
DeLuca, J., Barbieri-Berger, S., & Johnson, S.K. (1994). The nature of memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: Acquisition versus retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 183–189.Google Scholar
DeLuca, J., Gaudino, E.A., Diamond, B.J., Christodoulou, C., & Engel, R.A. (1998). Acquisition and storage deficits in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 376–390.Google Scholar
Demaree, H.A., Gaudino, E.A., DeLuca, J., & Ricker, J.H. (2000). Learning impairment is associated with recall ability in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 865–873.Google Scholar
DeSousa, E.A., Albert, R.H., & Kalman, B. (2002). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: A review. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 17, 23–29.Google Scholar
D'Esposito, M., Onishi, K., Thompson, H., Robinson, K., Armstrong, C., & Grossman, M. (1996). Working memory impairments in multiple sclerosis: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychology, 10, 51–56.Google Scholar
Dobbs, A.R., Aubrey, J.B., & Rule, B.G. (1989). Age-associated release from proactive interference: A review. Canadian Psychology, 30, 588–595.Google Scholar
Foong, J., Rozewicz, L., Quaghebeur, G., Davie, C.A., Kartsounis, L.D., Thompson, A.J., Miller, D.H., & Ron, M.A. (1997). Executive function in multiple sclerosis. Brain, 120, 15–26.Google Scholar
Freedman, M. & Cermak, L.S. (1986). Semantic encoding deficits in frontal lobe disease and amnesia. Brain and Cognition, 5, 108–114.Google Scholar
Gaudino, E.A., Chiaravalloti, N.A., DeLuca, J., & Diamond, B.J. (2001). A comparison of memory performance in relapsing-remitting, primary progressive, and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 14, 32–44.Google Scholar
Glisky, E.L., Rubin, S.R., & Davidson, P.S. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1131–1146.Google Scholar
Goldstein, F.C., Levin, H.S., & Boake, C. (1989). Conceptual encoding following severe closed head injury. Cortex, 25, 541–554.Google Scholar
Goldstein, F.C., McKendall, R.R., & Haut, M.W. (1992). Gist recall in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 49, 1060–1064.Google Scholar
Gulick, E.E., Cook, S.D., & Troiano, R. (1997). Comparison of patient and staff assessment of MS patients' health status. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 88, 87–93.Google Scholar
Hedden, T. & Park, D.C. (2003). Contributions of source and inhibitory mechanisms to age-related retroactive interference in verbal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 93–112.Google Scholar
Higginson, C.I., Arnett, P.A., & Voss, W.D. (2000). The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 185–204.Google Scholar
Hunt, R.R. & McDaniel, M.A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421–445.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.K., DeLuca, J., Diamond, B.J., & Natelson, B.H. (1998). Memory dysfunction in fatiguing illness: Examining interference and distraction in short-term memory. Cognitive neuropsychiatry, 3, 269–285.Google Scholar
Kareken, D.A., Moberg, P.J., & Gur, R.C. (1996). Proactive inhibition and semantic organization: Relationship with verbal memory in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 486–493.Google Scholar
Keppel, G. & Underwood, B.J. (1962). Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1, 153–161.Google Scholar
Kessler, H.R., Cohen, R.A., Lauer, K., & Kausch, D.F. (1992). The relationship between disability and memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Neuroscience, 62, 17–34.Google Scholar
Kramer, J.H. & Delis, D.C. (1991). Interference effects on the California Verbal Learning Test: A construct validation study. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 299–302.Google Scholar
Kurtzke, J.F. (1965). Further notes on disability evaluation in multiple sclerosis, with scale modification. Neurology, 15, 654–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legenfelder, J., Chiaravalloti, N.D., Ricker, J.H., & DeLuca, J. (2003). Deciphering components of impaired working memory in multiple sclerosis. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 16, 28–39.Google Scholar
Litvan, I., Grafman, J., Vendrell, P., Martinez, J.M., Junque, C., Vendrell, J.M., & Barraquer-Bordas, J.L. (1988). Multiple memory deficits in patients with multiple sclerosis: Exploring the working memory system. Archives of Neurology, 45, 607–610.Google Scholar
Lustig, C., May, C.P., & Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 199–207.Google Scholar
Lykouras, L., Oulis, P., Adrachta, D., Daskalopoulou, E., Kalfakis, N., Triantapyllou, N., Papageorgiou, K., & Christodoulou, G.N. (1998). Beck Depression Inventory in the detection of depression among neurological inpatients. Psychopathology, 31, 213–219.Google Scholar
McDonald, C.R., Bauer, R.M., Grande, L., Gilmore, R., & Roper, S. (2001). The role of the frontal lobes in memory: Evidence from unilateral frontal resections for relief of intractable epilepsy. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 571–585.Google Scholar
McDonald, W.I., Compston, A., Edan, G., Goodkin, D., Hartung, H.P., Lublin, F.D., McFarland, H.F., Paty, D.W., Polman, C.H., Reingold, S.C., Sandberg-Wollheim, M., Sibley, W., Thompson, A., van den Noort, S., Weinshenker, B.Y., & Wolinsky, J.S. (2001). Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 50, 121–127.Google Scholar
Minden, S.L., Moes, E.J., Orav, J., Kaplan, E., & Reich, P. (1990). Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 566–586.Google Scholar
Minden, S.L. & Schiffer, R.B. (1990). Affective disorders in multiple sclerosis: Review and recommendations for clinical research. Archives of Neurology, 47, 98–104.Google Scholar
Moscovitch, M. (1994). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of frontal cortex and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology, 8, 524–534.Google Scholar
Numan, B., Sweet, J.J., & Ranganath, C. (2000). Use of the California Verbal Learning Test to detect proactive interference in the traumatically brain injured. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 553–562.Google Scholar
Parkin, A.J. & Lawrence, A. (1994). A dissociation in the relation between memory tasks and frontal lobe tests in the normal elderly. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1523–1532.Google Scholar
Pelosi, L., Geesken, J.M., Holly, M., Hayward, M., & Blumhardt, L.D. (1997). Working memory impairment in early multiple sclerosis: Evidence from an event-related potential study of patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain, 120, 2039–2058.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. & Peterson, M.J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.Google Scholar
Poser, C.M., Paty, D.W., Scheinberg, L., McDonald, W.I., Davis, F.A., Ebers, G.C., Johnson, K.P., Sibley, W.A., Silberberg, D.H., & Tourtellotte, W.W. (1983). New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology, 13, 227–231.Google Scholar
Postman, L. & Underwood, B.J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19–40.Google Scholar
Randolph, C., Gold, J.M., Carpenter, C.J., Goldberg, T.E., & Weinberger, D.R. (1992). Release from proactive interference: Determinants of performance and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 785–800.Google Scholar
Rao, S.M. (1986). Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis: A critical review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 503–542.Google Scholar
Rao, S.M., Grafman, J., DiGiulio, D., Mittenberg, W., Bernardin, L., Leo, G.J., Luchetta, T., & Unvervagt, F. (1993). Memory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: Its relation to working memory, semantic encoding, and implicit learning. Neuropsychology, 7, 364–374.Google Scholar
Rao, S.M., Leo, G.J., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology, 41, 685–691.Google Scholar
Rao, S.M., Leo, G.J., & St. Aubin-Faubert, P. (1989). On the nature of memory disturbance in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 699–712.Google Scholar
Sagar, H.J., Sullivan, E.V., & Cooper, J.A. (1991). Normal release from proactive interference in untreated patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1033–1044.Google Scholar
Sitskoorn, M.M., Nuyen, J., Appels, M.C., van der Wee, N.J., & Kahn, R.S. (2002). Release from proactive inhibition in schizophrenia and its potential as a genetic marker. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 67–81.Google Scholar
Solari, A., Amato, M.P., Bergamaschi, R., Logorscino, G., Citterio, A., Bochicchio, D., & Filippini, G. (1993). Accuracy of self-assessment of minimal record of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 87, 43–46.Google Scholar
Sperling, R.A., Guttman, C.R., Hohol, M.J., Warfield, S.K., Jakab, M., Parente, M., Diamond, E.L., Daffner, K.R., Olek, M.J., Orav, E.J., Kikinis, R., Jolesz, F.A., & Weiner, H.L. (2001). Regional magnetic resonance imaging lesion burden and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 58, 115–121.Google Scholar
Squire, L.R. (1982). Comparisons between forms of amnesia: Some deficits are unique to Korsakoff's syndrome. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 560–571.Google Scholar
Thornton, A.E., Raz, N., & Tucker, K.A. (2002). Memory in multiple sclerosis: Contextual encoding deficits. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 395–409.Google Scholar
Thornton, A.E. & Raz, N. (1997). Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology, 11, 357–366.Google Scholar
Torres, I.J., Flashman, L.A., O'Leary, D.S., & Andreasen, N.C. (2001). Effects of retroactive and proactive interference on word list recall in schizophrenia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 481–490.Google Scholar
Troyer, A.K., Fisk, J.D., Archibald, C.J., Ritvo, P.G., & Murray, T.J. (1996). Conceptual reasoning as a mediator of verbal recall in patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 211–219.Google Scholar
Vanderploeg, R.D., Crowell, T.A., & Curtiss, G. (2001). Verbal learning and memory deficits in traumatic brain injury: Encoding, consolidation, and retrieval. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 185–195.Google Scholar
Vanderploeg, R.D., Schinka, J.A., & Retzlaff, P. (1994). Relationships between measures of auditory verbal learning and executive functioning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 243–252.Google Scholar
Verdier-Taillefer, M.H., Roullet, E., Cesaro, P., & Alperovitch, A. (1994). Validation of self-reported neurological disability in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 23, 148–154.Google Scholar
Wickens, D.D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 77, 1–15.Google Scholar
Winocur, G., Kinsbourne, M., & Moscovitch, M. (1981). The effect of cuing on release from proactive interference in Korsakoff amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Learning and Memory, 7, 56–65.Google Scholar