Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T15:35:06.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Sati, the Bride, and the Widow: Sacrificial Woman in the Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Sophie Gilmartin
Affiliation:
University of London, Royal Holloway

Extract

My title brings together two cultures — Indian and British — and three phases of womanhood — the bride, the widow, and — through suttee — the dead widow. Suttee, or sati, is the obsolete Hindu practice in which a widow burns herself upon her husband's funeral pyre. In this essay I wish to explore how sati was used as a metaphor in British novels and periodicals in the nineteenth century — used both as a metaphor for the British widow's mourning rituals and for the plight of the British bride in an unhappy marriage. I shall argue that sati forms a nexus connecting the seemingly disparate situations of the bride and widow, and that it also in this metaphorical sense forms a nexus or point of comparison between British and Indian culture.

Type
Works in Progress
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Addison, J. R.Hours in Hindostan.” Bentley's Miscellany 12 (1842): 185–88.Google Scholar
SirBlackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 14th ed. Vol. 1. London, 1803.Google Scholar
Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre. Ed. Smith, Margaret M.. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Casteras, Susan P.The Substance or the Shadow: Images of Victorian Womanhood. New Haven: Yale Center For British Art, 1982.Google Scholar
Casteras, Susan P., and Parkinson, Ronald, eds. Richard Redgrave 1804–1888. New Haven: Yale UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Das, Devendra. “The Hindu Widow.” The Nineteenth Century 20 (09 1886): 364–73.Google Scholar
Greg, W. R.Why Are Women Redundant?National Review 14 (1862): 434–60.Google Scholar
Harberton, F. W.Mourning Clothes and Customs.” Woman's World (1889): 418–21.Google Scholar
“Hindoo Widows.” London Magazine 9 N. S. (December. 1827): 541–52.Google Scholar
Hook, T. E.Love and Pride. Vol. 1. London, 1833.Google Scholar
Joshi, V., ed. Rammohun Roy and the Process of Modernization in India. Delhi: Vikas, 1975.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. Hartley.The Suttee: The Narrative of an Eye-Witness.” Bentley's Miscellany 13 (1843): 241–56.Google Scholar
Mani, Lata. “The Production of an Official Discourse on Sati in Early Nineteenth-Century Bengal.” Europe and its Others. Ed. Barker, Francis et al. Proc. of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature, July 1984. Colchester: Univ. of Essex, 1985. 107–27.Google Scholar
Meredith, George. Beauchamp's Career. Ed. Harris, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Meredith, George. The Egoist. Ed. Woodcock, George. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. “Sati: A Nineteenth-Century Tale of Women, Violence and Protest.” Joshi 168–94. Petronius. The Satyricon. Petronius, The Satyricon and Seneca, The Apocolocyntosis. Trans. Sullivan, J. P.. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Ray, Ajit. “Widows Are Not For Burning: Native Response to the Abolition of the Sati Rite.” Sati:Historical and Phenomenological Essays. Arvind Sharma with Ajit Ray, Alaka Hejib, and Katherine Young. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1988. 4956.Google Scholar
“The Royal Academy.” The Art-Union 8 (06 1846): 177.Google Scholar
“The Royal Academy.” The Critic 3 (30 05 1846): 622–23.Google Scholar
Sharma, Arvind. “Sati: A Study in Western Reactions.” Sharma, Ray et al. 113.Google Scholar
Taylor, Lou. Mourning Dress: A Costume and Social History. London: Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. Barchester Towers. Eds. Sadleir, Michael and Page, Frederick. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1980.Google Scholar
Trollope, Anthony. Can You Forgive Her? Ed. Swarbrick, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1982.Google Scholar