Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:18:06.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ROBBINS AND WELFARE ECONOMICS: A REAPPRAISAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Symposium on The Nature and Significance of Economic Science by Lionel Robbins
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, R. E. 1985. A History of Modern Economic Analysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Backhouse, R. E., 2010. “J. A. Hobson as a welfare economist”, in Backhouse, R. E. and Nishizawa, T. (eds) No Wealth but Life: Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, . 2008. “Faith, Morality and Welfare: The ‘English School of Welfare Economics,’ 1901–29.” History of Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 40, Keeping Faith, Losing Faith: Religious Belief and Political Economy, Bateman, B. W. and Banzhaf, S., eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 212–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. E., and Nishizawa, T.. 2010. “Towards a reinterpretation of the history of welfare economics”, in Backhouse, R. E. and Nishizawa, T. (eds) No Wealth but Life: Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 1997. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, H. 1916. Economics: An Introduction for the General Reader. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Clay, H. 1918. Economics: An Introduction for the General Reader. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Emmett, R. 2008. “The Religion of a Skeptic: Frank Knight on Ethics, Spirituality, and Religion During His Iowa Years.” History of Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 40, Keeping Faith, Losing Faith: Religious Belief and Political Economy, Bateman, B. W. and Banzhaf, S., eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. H. 1919a. “An Appraisal of Clay's Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 27 (4): 300–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, . 1919b. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory.” American Economic Review 9: 309–18.Google Scholar
Hawtrey, R. G. 1926. The Economic Problem. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1914. Work and Wealth. London: Macmillan. Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hobson, . 1929. Wealth and Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Homan, P. T. 1927. “The Impasse in Economic Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 35 (6): 776–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, . 1928. Contemporary Economic Thought. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Howson, S. 2004. “On the Origins of Lionel Robbins's Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science.” History of Political Economy 36 (3): 413–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, T. W. 2009. “A Formative Decade: Methodological Controversy in the 1930s.” Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. N. 1997 [1890] The Scope and Method of Political Economy. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. First edition 1890.Google Scholar
Levin, H. J. 1956. “Standards of Welfare in Economic Thought.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1): 117–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W. T.-C. 1934. A Study of Hobson's Welfare Economics. Peipeng: Kwang Yuen Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. C. 1969. Types of Economic Theory: From Mercantilism to Institutionalism. New York: Augustus Kelley.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nishizawa, T. 2010. “The ethico-historical approach abroad: the case of Fukuda”, in Backhouse, R. E. and Nishizawa, T. (eds) No Wealth but Lite: Welfre Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, M. G. 1979. “Pigou: An Extension of Sidgwickian Thought.” History of Political Economy 11 (4): 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1912. Wealth and Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, . 1920. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, . 1932. The Economics of Welfare. 4th edition. London: Macmillan. Reprinted 1946.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, T. 2003. Marshall's Evolutionary Economics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. C. 1927. “Mr. Hawtrey on the Scope of Economics.” Economica 20: 172–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, . 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robbins, . 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. 2007. “American Institutionalism and Its British Connections.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (2): 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1874. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stamp, J. 1929. Some Economic Factors in Modern Life. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar
Tawney, R. H. 1920. The Sickness of an Acquisitive Society. London: Fabian Society/George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Tawney, . 1921. The Acquisitive Society. London: G. Bell.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J. K. 1996. The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist. 3 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. B. 1931. “On the Content of Welfare.” American Economic Review 21: 207–21.Google Scholar