Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:43:25.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Friedrich Ludwig's ‘Musicology of the Future’: a commentary and translation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2003

Abstract

Friedrich Ludwig's appointment in medieval music at the University of Straßburg came at a crucial time for German musicology, then a new discipline in a flourishing academic environment. Upon entering his post at Straßburg in the autumn of 1905, Ludwig delivered a formal lecture, here translated, in which he outlined the goals for twentieth-century medieval musicology. While many of these goals, in particular the editing of certain theorists and late medieval repertories, have been achieved, other directions implied in Ludwig's synthetic approach have received less attention. Ludwig's own musicology was a creative combination of forces: on the one hand, a reaction to earlier French scholarship in archaeology and philology; on the other, a borrowing of recent German trends in historiography, philosophy and music. Most notable is the influence of Ranke and Hegel on Ludwig's then new concept of latent rhythm (i.e., ‘modal rhythm’) in medieval music. A century of scholarship later, Ludwig's vision for musicology as an innovative interdisciplinary conjunction has much to teach us.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is the last in a triptych of biographical studies devoted to the earliest exponents of the so-called modal theory of medieval rhythm. The first focused on Pierre Aubry: ‘The “Modal Theory”, Fencing and the Death of Pierre Aubry’, Plainsong and Medieval Music, 6 (1997), 143–50; and the second on Jean Beck: ‘The First Musical Edition of the Troubadours: On Applying the Critical Method to Medieval Monophony’, Music & Letters, 83 (2002), 351–70. This third essay on Friedrich Ludwig is dedicated to Robert Falck, who first lured me into German musicology on the Middle Ages, and who has been mentoring young musicologists at the University of Toronto for three decades. An earlier paper which remotely resembled this essay was presented at the Southeastern Medieval Association's annual meeting at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, on 16 October 1999. For subsequent research, I should like to thank the Deutsche Akademischer Austauschdienst foundation and the Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek in Göttingen for their help in the summer of 2000. I owe a great deal to the generosity of two librarians: Bärbel Mund in Göttingen and Marie-Laure Ingelaere of the Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg. I should also like to thank Anna Maria Busse Berger for her generous comments and sharing of unpublished work, Luther Dittmer for his insights into Ludwig and his work, and an anonymous reader for critiquing an earlier version of this essay.