Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:33:17.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of rehydration technique on the response of recalcitrant seed embryos to desiccation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Rosa Perán ,
N.W. Pammenter ,
Janine Naicker  and
Patricia Berjak
Rosa Perán
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal§, Durban, 4041, South Africa
N.W. Pammenter*
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal§, Durban, 4041, South Africa
Janine Naicker
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal§, Durban, 4041, South Africa
Patricia Berjak
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal§, Durban, 4041, South Africa
*
*Correspondence Fax: +27 31 260 1195, Email: pammente@ukzn.ac.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of ‘imbibitional damage’ arose when it was observed that considerable leakage of cell contents could occur when dry seed or pollen tissues are plunged directly into water. It is now common practice to imbibe dehydrated tissue slowly, to permit the re-establishment of functional membranes, prior to placing the tissue into liquid water. However, this argument may not hold if the tissue of interest is inherently desiccation-sensitive. Slow drying of desiccation-sensitive (recalcitrant) seeds or excised embryonic axes results in damage at high water contents, because it permits time for aqueous-based deleterious processes to occur. The same argument may apply if partially dried material is re-imbibed slowly, as this technique will also expose the tissue to intermediate water contents for protracted periods. This hypothesis was tested using embryos or axes from seeds of three recalcitrant species (Artocarpus heterophyllus, Podocarpus henkelii and Ekebergia capensis). Excised material was rapidly dried to water contents within the range over which viability is lost during drying, and re-imbibed either rapidly, by plunging directly into water, or slowly, by placing the material on damp filter paper or exposing it to a saturated atmosphere for several hours. Although details of the response differed among species and developmental stage, in all cases direct re-imbibition in water resulted in higher (or similar, but never lower) survival than either of the slow rehydration techniques.

Keywords

dehydrationdesiccation-sensitivity recalcitrantrehydrationseeds
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , May 2004 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berjak, P., Pammenter, N.W. and Vertucci, C. (1992) Homoiohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: developmental status, desiccation sensitivity and the state of water in axes of Landolphia kirkii Dyer. Planta 186, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berjak, P., Vertucci, C.W. and Pammenter, N.W. (1993) Effects of developmental status and dehydration rate on characteristics of water and desiccation-sensitivity in recalcitrant seeds of Camellia sinensis. Seed Science Research 3, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramlage, W.J., Leopold, A.C. and Parrish, D.J. (1978) Chilling stress to soybeans during imbibition. Plant Physiology 61, 525–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, M.C., van Staden, J. (1981) Germination and viability studies on the seeds of Podocarpus henkelii Stapf. South African Journal of Science 77, 171–174.Google Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Berjak, P. and Pammenter, N.W. (1985) The effect of drying rate on viability retention of recalcitrant propagules of Avicennia marina. South African Journal of Botany 51, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1986) The increasing desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant Avicennia marina seeds with storage time. Physiologia Plantarum 67, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1989) Germination associated events and the desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant seeds – a study on three unrelated species. Planta 178, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P. and Walters, C. (1997) Subcellular organization and metabolic activity during the development of seeds that attain different levels of desiccation tolerance. Seed Science Research 7, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, W.E., Blake, P.S. and Clay, H.A. (1996) Desiccation stress in recalcitrant Quercus robur L. seeds results in lipid peroxidation and increased synthesis of jasmonates and abscisic acid. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 661–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, P.R. and Obendorf, R.L. (1972) Interaction of initial seed moisture and imbibitional temperature on germination and productivity of soybean. Crop Science 12, 664–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, F.A., van der, Wal, E.W. (1988) Initial moisture content and temperature of imbibition determine extent of imbibitional injury in pollen. Journal of Plant Physiology 133, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, F.A., Golovina, E.A., van Aelst, C.A. and Hemminga, M.A. (1999) Imbibitional leakage from anhydrobiotes revisited. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 1121–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosanke, J.W., Osburn, R.M., Shuppe, G.I. and Smith, R.S. (1992) Slow rehydration improves the recovery of dried bacterial populations. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 38, 520–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leprince, O., van Aelst, A.C., Pritchard, H.W. and Murphy, D.J. (1998) Oleosins prevent oil-body coalescence during seed imbibition as suggested by a low-temperature scanning electron microscope study of desiccation-tolerant and -sensitive oilseeds. Planta 204, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y.H. and Sun, W.Q. (2000) Desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant Theobroma cacao embryonic axes: the optimal drying rate and its physiological basis. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1911–1919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murashige, T. and Skoog, E. (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mycock, D. (1999) Addition of calcium and magnesium to a glycerol and sucrose cryoprotectant solution improves the quality of plant embryo recovery from cryostorage. Cryo-Letters 20, 77–82.Google Scholar
Normah, M.N., Chin, H.F. and Hor, Y.L. (1986) Desiccation and cryopreservation of embryonic axes of Hevea brasiliensis Muell.-Arg. Pertanika 9, 299–303.Google Scholar
Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (1999) A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccation-tolerance mechanisms. Seed Science Research 9, 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Farrant, J.M. and Berjak, P. (1984) Recalcitrant seeds: short-term storage effects in Avicennia marina (Forsk.) vierh. may be germination-associated. Annals of Botany 54, 843–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Vertucci, C.W. and Berjak, P. (1991) Homeohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: dehydration, the state of water and viability characteristics in Landolphia kirkii. Plant Physiology 96, 1093–1098.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pammenter, N.W., Greggains, V., Kioko, J.I., Wesley-Smith, J., Berjak, P. and Finch-Savage, W.E. (1998) Effects of different drying rates on viability retention of recalcitrant seeds of Ekebergia capensis. Seed Science Research 8, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P., Wesley-Smith, J., Vander, Willigen, C. (2002) Experimental aspects of drying and recovery. pp. 93–110in Black, M. and Pritchard, H.W. (Eds) Desiccation and survival in plants: Drying without dying. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, B.M. (1969) Imbibition temperature sensitivity of lima bean seeds controlled by initial seed moisture. Plant Physiology 44, 907–911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, H.W. (1991) Water potential and embryonic axis viability in recalcitrant seeds of Quercus rubra. Annals of Botany 67, 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E.W. (1974) Phospholipids and plant membrane permeability. New Phytologist 73, 377–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompsett, P.B. and Pritchard, H.W. (1998) The effect of chilling and moisture status on the germination, desiccation tolerance and longevity of Aesculus hippocastanum L. seed. Annals of Botany 82, 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertucci, C.W. (1989) The kinetics of seed imbibition: controlling factors and relevance to seedling vigor. pp. 93–115in Stanwood, P.C. and McDonald, M.B. (Eds) Seed moisture. Crop Science Society of America Special Publication No. 14. Madison, Wisconsin CSSA.Google Scholar
Vertucci, C.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1995) Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. pp. 237–271in Kigel, J. and Galili, G. (Eds) Seed development and germination. New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Walters, C., Pammenter, N.W., Berjak, P. and Crane, J. (2001) Desiccation damage, accelerated ageing and respiration in desiccation tolerant and sensitive seeds. Seed Science Research 11, 135–148.Google Scholar
Walters, C., Farrant, J.M., Pammenter, N.W. and Berjak, P. (2002) Desiccation stress and damage. 263–291in Black, M. and Pritchard, H.W. (Eds) Desiccation and survival in plants: Drying without dying. Wallingford, CABI PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar