Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:13:31.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carotid baroreceptor reflexes in humans during orthostatic stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2001

Victoria L. Cooper
Affiliation:
Institute for Cardiovascular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Roger Hainsworth
Affiliation:
Institute for Cardiovascular Research, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Get access

Abstract

Orthostatic stress, including standing, head-up tilting and lower body suction, results in increases in peripheral vascular resistance but little or no change in mean arterial pressure. This study was undertaken to determine whether the sensitivity of the carotid baroreceptor reflex was enhanced during conditions of decreased venous return. We studied eight healthy subjects and determined responses of pulse interval (ECG) and forearm vascular resistance (mean finger blood pressure divided by Doppler estimate of brachial artery blood velocity) to graded increases and decreases in carotid transmural pressure, effected by a neck suction/pressure device. Responses were determined with and without the application of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -40 mmHg. Stimulus-response curves were determined as the responses to graded neck pressure changes and the differential of this provided estimates of reflex sensitivity. Changes in carotid transmural pressure caused graded changes in R-R interval and vascular resistance. The cardiac responses were unaffected by LBNP. Vascular resistance responses, however, were significantly enhanced during LBNP and the peak gain of the reflex was increased from 1.2 ± 0.3 (mean ± S.E.M.) to 2.2 ± 0.3 units (P < 0.05). The increased baroreflex gain may contribute to maintenance of blood pressure during orthostatic stress and limit the pressure decreases during prolonged periods of such stress. Experimental Physiology (2001) 86.5, 677-681.

Type
Full Length Papers
Copyright
© The Physiological Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)