Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:00:13.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-situ tensile testing of single-crystal molybdenum-alloy fibers with various dislocation densities in a scanning electron microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2011

Kurt E. Johanns ,
Andreas Sedlmayr ,
P. Sudharshan Phani ,
Reiner Mönig ,
Oliver Kraft ,
Easo P. George  and
George M. Pharr
Kurt E. Johanns
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Andreas Sedlmayr
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Materials Research II (IMF II), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
P. Sudharshan Phani
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
Reiner Mönig
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Materials Research II (IMF II), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Oliver Kraft
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Materials Research II (IMF II), 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Easo P. George
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996; and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
George M. Pharr*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996; and Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: pharr@utk.edu
Get access

Abstract

In-situ tensile tests have been performed in a dual beam focused ion beam and scanning electron microscope on as-grown and prestrained single-crystal molybdenum-alloy (Mo-alloy) fibers. The fibers had approximately square cross sections with submicron edge lengths and gauge lengths in the range of 9–41 μm. In contrast to previously observed yield strengths near the theoretical strength of 10 GPa in compression tests of ∼1–3-μm long pillars made from similar Mo-alloy single crystals, a wide scatter of yield strengths between 1 and 10 GPa was observed in the as-grown fibers tested in tension. Deformation was dominated by inhomogeneous plastic events, sometimes including the formation of Lüders bands. In contrast, highly prestrained fibers exhibited stable plastic flow, significantly lower yield strengths of ∼1 GPa, and stress–strain behavior very similar to that in compression. A simple, statistical model incorporating the measured dislocation densities is developed to explain why the tension and compression results for the as-grown fibers are different.

Keywords

MoStress/strain relationshipStrength
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 27 , Issue 3: Focus Issue: Advances in Mechanics of One-Dimensional Micro/Nanomaterials , 14 February 2012 , pp. 508 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Uchic, M.D. and Dimiduk, D.M.: A methodology to investigate size scale effects in crystalline plasticity using uniaxial compression testing. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 400–401, 268 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Greer, J.R., Oliver, W.C., and Nix, W.D.: Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients. Acta Mater. 53, 1821 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kiener, D., Motz, C., Schöberl, T., Jenko, M., and Dehm, G.: Determination of mechanical properties of copper at the micron scale. Adv. Eng. Mater. 8, 1119 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Volkert, C.A. and Lilleodden, E.T.: Size effects in the deformation of sub-micron Au columns. Philos. Mag. 86, 5567 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hemker, K.J. and Sharpe, W.N.: Microscale characterization of mechanical properties. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 37, 93 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kiener, D., Grosinger, W., Dehm, G., and Pippan, R.: A further step towards an understanding of size-dependent crystal plasticity: In situ tension experiments of miniaturized single-crystal copper samples. Acta Mater. 56, 580 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Uchic, M.D., Shade, P.A., and Dimiduk, D.M.: Plasticity of micrometer-scale single crystals in compression. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 39, 361 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Schneider, A.S., Clark, B.G., Frick, C.P., Gruber, P.A., and Arzt, E.: Effect of orientation and loading rate on compression behavior of small-scale Mo pillars. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 508, 241 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kraft, O., Gruber, P.A., Mönig, R., and Weygand, D.: Plasticity in confined dimensions. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 293 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pharr, G.M., Herbert, E.G., and Gao, Y.: The indentation size effect: A critical examination of experimental observations and mechanistic interpretations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 271 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gianola, D. and Eberl, C.: Micro- and nanoscale tensile testing of materials. JOM 61, 24 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Bei, H., Shim, S., George, E.P., Miller, M.K., Herbert, E.G., and Pharr, G.M.: Compressive strengths of molybdenum alloy micro-pillars prepared using a new technique. Scr. Mater. 57, 397 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Bei, H., Shim, S., Pharr, G.M., and George, E.P.: Effects of pre-strain on the compressive stress-strain response of Mo-alloy single-crystal micropillars. Acta Mater. 56, 4762 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ogata, S., Li, J., Hirosaki, N., Shibutani, Y., and Yip, S.: Ideal shear strain of metals and ceramics. Phys. Rev. B 70, 104104 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Phani, P.S., Johanns, K.E., Duscher, G., Gali, A., George, E.P., and Pharr, G.M.: Scanning transmission electron microscope observations of defects in as-grown and pre-strained Mo alloy fibers. Acta Mater. 59, 2172 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lowry, M.B., Kiener, D., LeBlanc, M.M., Chisholm, C., Florando, J.N., Morris, J.W. Jr., and Minor, A.M.: Achieving the ideal strength in annealed molybdenum nanopillars. Acta Mater. 58, 5160 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Maaß, R., Van Petegem, S., Borca, C.N., and Van Swygenhoven, H.: In situ Laue diffraction of metallic micropillars. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 524, 40 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Kiener, D., Motz, C., Rester, M., Jenko, M., and Dehm, G.: FIB damage of Cu and possible consequences for miniaturized mechanical tests. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 459, 262 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Greer, J.R. and Nix, W.D.: Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the sub-micron scale. Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 80, 1625 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Bei, H. and George, E.P.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of a directionally solidified NiAl-Mo eutectic alloy. Acta Mater. 53, 69 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Dickinson, J.M. and Armstrong, P.E.: Temperature dependence of the elastic constants of molybdenum. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 602 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Gianola, D.S., Sedlmayr, A., Monig, R., Volkert, C.A., Major, R.C., Cyrankowski, E., Asif, S.A.S., Warren, O.L., and Kraft, O.: In situ nanomechanical testing in focused ion beam and scanning electron microscopes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 063901 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Eberl, C., Gianola, D., and Hemker, K.: Mechanical characterization of coatings using microbeam bending and digital image correlation techniques. Exp. Mech. 50, 85 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Kim, J-Y. and Greer, J.R.: Tensile and compressive behavior of gold and molybdenum single crystals at the nano-scale. Acta Mater. 57, 5245 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Kim, J-Y., Jang, D., and Greer, J.R.: Tensile and compressive behavior of tungsten, molybdenum, tantalum and niobium at the nanoscale. Acta Mater. 58, 2355 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Frankel, D., Milenkovic, S., Smith, A.J., and Hassel, A.W.: Nanostructuring of NiAl-Mo eutectic alloys by selective phase dissolution. Electrochim. Acta 54, 6015 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Roediger, P., Wanzenboeck, H.D., Hochleitner, G., and Bertagnolli, E.: Evaluation of chamber contamination in a scanning electron microscope. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27, 2711 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.van Dorp, W.F. and Hagen, C.W.: A critical literature review of focused electron beam induced deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 081301 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Shim, S., Bei, H., Miller, M.K., Pharr, G.M., and George, E.P.: Effects of focused-ion-beam milling on the compressive behavior of directionally solidified micropillars and the nanoindentation response of an electropolished surface. Acta Mater. 57, 503 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Bei, H., Shim, S., Miller, M.K., Pharr, G.M., and George, E.P.: Effects of focused-ion-beam milling on the nanomechanical behavior of a molybdenum-alloy single crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 111915 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Brenner, S.S.: Tensile strength of whiskers. J. Appl. Phys. 27, 1484 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Brenner, S.S.: Plastic deformation of copper and silver whiskers. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1023 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Parthasarathy, T.A., Rao, S.I., Dimiduk, D.M., Uchic, M.D., and Trinkle, D.R.: Contribution to size effect of yield strength from the stochastics of dislocation source lengths in finite samples. Scr. Mater. 56, 313 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar