Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T20:09:44.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Activity, Social Network and Well-Being: An Empirical Examination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Howard Litwin
Howard Litwin
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study ofolder adults in Israel (n = 170) examined the relationship of activity level and social network characteristics to respondents' subjective well-being, controlling for background socio-demographic characteristics and extent of physical disability. Factor analysis derived three activity factors corresponding to formal, informal and solitary activity. A hierarchical regression procedure revealed that physical disability accounted for 40 per cent of the variance in the well-being measure. Extent of informal activity explained another 3 percent of the variance, but was outweighed in the final model by the addition of a social network factor – degree of network supportiveness (R2 =.48). The findings suggest that it is the social network aspect of activity that makes a difference in older persons' subjective well-being, rather than the effect of activity per se.

Résumé

Une étude de personnes ágeés en Israel (n = 170) a examiné la relation qui lient le niveau d'activité et certaines charactéristiques du réseau social, au bien-être subjectif des répondants, tout en controllant les charactéristiques socio-démographiques de bases, ainsi que l'ampleur de l'incapacité physique. Une analyse factorielle a dérivé trois facteurs d'activité correspondant aux activités officielles, informelles et solitaires. Une procédure de régression hiérarchique a révélé que l'incapacité physique expliquait 40 pour cent de la variance dans la mesure du bien-être. Le niveau d'activité informelle expliquait 3 pour cent supplémentaires de la variance, mais a cependant été affaibli dans le model final par l'addition d'un facteur du réseau social – le degré de soutien fourni par le réseau (R2 = .48). Les résultats laissent penser que c'est l'aspect réseau social de l'activité qui fait la différence dans le bien-être subjectif des personnes âgées, plutôt que l'effet de l'activité elle-même.

Keywords

ActivitySocial NetworkSubjective Well-BeingDisabilityIsraelActivitéréseau socialbien-étre subjectifincapacité physiqueIsrael.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , Automne/Fall 2000 , pp. 343 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelmann, P.K. (1994). Multiple roles and psychological well-being in a national sample of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 49(6), S277–S285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auslander, G.K., & Litwin, H. (1991). Social networks, social support, and self-ratings of health among the elderly. Journal of Aging & Health, 5(4), 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S.H., & Page, J.W. (1988). Involvement in activities and the psychological well-being of retired men. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 11(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
Bowling, A. (1990). Associations with life satisfaction among very elderly people living in a deprived part of inner London. Social Science & Medicine, 31(9), 1003–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, A., Farquhar, M., Grundy, E., & Formby, J. (1993). Changes in life satisfaction over a two and a half year period among very elderly people in London. Social Science & Medicine, 36(5), 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, R.H., & Dodder, R.A. (1985). Activity and affect among the aged. Journal of Social Psychology, 125(1), 127–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, N.L. (1991). The role offamily and friends in quality of life. In Birren, J. E., Lubben, J. E., Rowe, J. C., & Deutchman, D. E. (Eds.). The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly (pp. 172–190). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, N.L., & Marshall, V.W. (1992). Social integration and caregiving among seniors in Bermuda. Ageing & Society, 12(4), 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S., & Syme, S.L. (Eds.). (1985). Social support and health. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cornoni-Huntley J., C, Roley, D.F., White, L.R., Suzman, R., Berkman, L.F., Evans, D.A., & Wallace, R.B. (1985). Epidemiology of disability in the oldest old: Methodological issues and preliminary findings. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/ Health and Society, 63, 350–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtenay, B.C., Poon, L.W., Martin, P., Clayton, G.M., & Johnson, M.A. (1992). Religiosity and adaptation in the oldest-old. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34(1), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coward, R.T. (1987). Factors associated with the configuration of the helping networks of noninstitutionalized elders. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 10(1-2), 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, H., & Hammonds, A. (1988). Religiosity, aging, and life satisfaction. Journal of Religion & Aging, 5(1-2), 1–21.Google Scholar
Cummming, E., Dean, L.R., Newell, D.S., & McCaffrey, I. (1960). Disengagement: A tentative theory of aging. Sociometry, 23, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depuis, S.L., & Smale B. J., A. (1995). An examination of the relationship between psychological well-being and depression and leisure activity participation among older adults. Loisir et Société/ Society and Leisure, 18(1), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, L.T., Kohout, F.J., & Heckert, D.A. (1985). Retirement satisfaction in the rural elderly. Research on Aging, 7(4), 577–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducharme, F. (1994). Conjugal support, coping behaviors, and psychological wellbeing of the elderly spouse: An empirical model. Research on Aging, 16(2), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.W., & Hong. L., K. (1982). Quality and quantity of social interactions in the life satisfaction of older Americans. Sociology & Social Research, 66(4), 418–434.Google Scholar
Ell, K. (1984). Social networks, social support and health status. Social Service Review, 58(1), 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fengler, A.P., Danigelis, N., & Little, V.C. (1983). Later life satisfaction and household structure: Living with others and living alone. Ageing & Society, 3(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girzadas, P.M., Counte, M.A., Glandon, G.L., & Tancredi, D. (1993). An analysis of elderly health and life satisfaction. Behavior, Health, & Aging, 3(2), 103–117.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, B. (Ed.). (1981). Social networks and social support. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gray, D., & Calsyn, R.J. (1989). Relationship of stress and social support to life satisfaction: Age effects. Journal of Community Psychology, 17(3), 214–219.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, K., & Mansbach, W.E. (1984). The multifaceted nature of social support in a community sample of elderly women. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J., & Kahn, R. (1985). Measures and concepts of social support. In Cohen, S., and Syme, S. L. (Eds.). Social support and health (pp. 83–108). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hout, D.R., Kaiser, M.A., Peters, G.R., & Babchuk, N. (1980). life satisfaction and activity theory: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Gerontology, 35(6), 935–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husaini, B.A., & Moore, S.T. (1990). Arthritis disability, depression and life satisfaction among Black elderly people. Health and Social Work, 15(4), 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, C.L., & Barer, B.M. (1992). Patterns of engagement and disengagement among the oldest-old. Journal of Aging Studies, 6(4), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, R.L., & Antonucci, T.C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles and social support. In Baltes, P., & Brim, O. G. (Eds.). Life-span development and behavior, Vol. 3 (pp. 253–286). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kendig, H. (Ed.). (1986). Ageing and families: A social networks perspective. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C.A., King, J.A., & Muraco, W.A. (1983). The relative strength of health as a predictor of life satisfaction. International Social Science Review, 58, 97–102.Google Scholar
Khullar, G.S., & Reynolds, B.C. (1990). Quality of life and activity: A test of the activity versus disengagement theories. International Review of Modern Sociology, 20(1), 33–68.Google Scholar
Koenig, H.G., Siegler, I.C., & George, L.K. (1989). Religious and non-religious coping: Impact on adaptation in later life. Journal ofReligion & Aging, 5(4), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center morale scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 50(1), 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.J., & Markides, K.S. (1990). Activity and mortality among aged persons over an eight year period. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45(1), S39–S42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemon, B.W., Bengtson, V.L., & Peterson, J.A. (1972). Exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of Gerontology, 27(4), 511–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, W.M. (1981-1982). Successful aging: An elaboration of social and psychological factors. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 14(3), 223–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitt, M.J., Antonucci, T.C., Clark, M.C., Rotton, J., & Finley, G.E. (1985-1986). Social support and well being: Preliminary indicators based on two samples of the elderly. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 21(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litwak, E. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Litwin, H. (Ed.). (1996). The social networks of older people: A cross national analysis. Westport, CT and London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lomranz, J., Bergman, S., Eyal, N., & Shmotkin, D. (1988). Indoor and outdoor activities of aged women and men as related to depression and well-being. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 26(4), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longino, C.F., & Kart, G.S. (1982). Explicating activitytheory: A formal replication. Journal of Gerontology, 37(6), 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubben, J.E. (1988). Assessing social networks among elderly populations. Family Community Health, 11, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancini, J.A., Quinn, W., Gavigan, M.A., & Franklin, H. (1980). Social network interaction among older adults: Implications for life satisfaction. Human Relations, 33(8), 543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee J., L. (1985). The effects of siblings on the life satisfaction of the rural elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47(1), 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, B., & Campbell, J. (1987). Race, socioeconomic status, and the subjective well being of older Americans. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 25(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, J.C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. In Mitchell, J. C. (Ed.), Social networks in urban situations (pp. 1–50). London: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, K, Dallosso, H., Bassey, E.J., Ebrahim, S., Fentem, P.H., & Arie T. H., D. (1991). Customary physical activity, psychological well-being and successful ageing. Ageing & Society, 11(4), 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D.C. (1991). Church attendance, religious activities, and the life satisfaction of older adults in Middletown U.S.A. Journal of Religious Gerontology, 8(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newsom, J.T., & Schulz, R. (1996). Social support as a mediator in the relation between functional status and quality of life in older adults. Psychology & Aging, 11(1), 34–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norbeck, J.S., Iindsey, A.M., & Carrieri, V.L. (1981). The development of an instrument to measure social support. Nursing Research, 30, 264–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmore, E. (1979). Predictors of successful aging. Gerontologist, 19(5), 427–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitzes, D. C.Mutran, E. J., & Verrill, L. A. (1995). Activities and self-esteem: Continuing the development of activity theory. Research on Aging, 17(3), 260–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J.F. (1978). Activity preferences of community residing aged as a guide for practice emphases. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 1(2), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagy, S., & Antonovsky, A. (1990). Explaining life satisfaction in later-life: The sense ofcoherence model and activity theory. Behavior, Health, &Aging, 1(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
Salamon, M.J. (1985). Sociocultural role theories in the elderly: A replication and extension. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 7(2), 111–122.Google Scholar
Schroots J. J., F. (1996). Theoretical developments in the psychology of aging. Gerontologist, 36(6), 742–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segal, M.E., & Schall, R.R. (1996). Life satisfaction and caregiving stress for individuals with stroke and their primary caregivers. Rehabilitation Psychology, 41(4), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkamp, M.W., & Kelly, J.R. (1985). Relationships among motivational orientation, level of leisure activity, and life satisfaction in older men and women. Journal of Psychology, 119(6), 509–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinkamp, M.W., & Kelly, J.R. (1987). Social integration, leisure activity, and life satisfaction in older adults: Activity theory revisited. International Journal of Aging & Adult Human Development, 25(4), 293–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wethington, E., & Kessler, R.C. (1986). Perceived support, received support and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 27(1), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmer, Z., Hickey, T., & Searle, M.S. (1997). The pattern of change in leisure activity among older adults with arthritis. Gerontologist, 37(3), 384–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed