Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:33:58.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors shaping implementation of protected area management decisions: a case study of the Zakynthos National Marine Park

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2006

ANATOLI TOGRIDOU
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University, UPB 119, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece
TASOS HOVARDAS
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University, UPB 119, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece
JOHN D. PANTIS
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University, UPB 119, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Institutional and non-institutional factors for the success of protected area (PA) governance have repeatedly been identified, but their relative weight has not been evaluated. To investigate the implementation of PA management in Zakynthos (Greece), meeting minutes of the local Park Authority for its first four years of operation were reviewed and statistically analysed. The Park Authority's autonomy and management complexity were indicated and with reference to governance, members of the local Park Authority belonged to the ‘inner-circle’ of decision-making and the Ministry of Environment formed the ‘environment’, since administrative issues had to be approved by the latter. Implementation of actions referring to administrative issues was less likely than implementation of environmental, social and economic arrangements, where the Park Authority had a higher degree of autonomy. The implementation of arrangements for promoting administrative stability and viability was highly dependent on external actions (annual government funding and approval of by-law governance and implementation). The more sophisticated and complex the governance system became, the more likely it was that Park Authority encountered difficulty when trying to make choices and changes. The methodology proved effective in revealing the management behaviour of the Park Authority, as well as indicating institutional and non-institutional issues that most significantly affected the harnessing of resources and the degree of action implementation; this could offer crucial feedback to managers and governmental representatives on the factors responsible for the success or failure of PA management.

Type
Papers
Copyright
2006 Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)