Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Moher, David
Jadad, Alejandro R
Nichol, Graham
Penman, Marie
Tugwell, Peter
and
Walsh, Sharon
1995.
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.
Controlled Clinical Trials,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 1,
p.
62.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Assendelft, Willem J. J.
Koes, Bart W.
and
Bouter, Lex M.
1997.
Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.
Spine,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 20,
p.
2323.
Nony, P
Cucherat, M
Haugh, MC
and
Boissel, JP
1997.
Standardization of terminology in meta‐analysis: a proposal for working definitions.
Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 6,
p.
481.
Ray, Joel G.
1998.
Meta-analysis of Nifedipine versus Beta-sympathomimetic Agents for Tocolysis during Preterm Labour.
Journal SOGC,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
259.
Verhagen, Arianne P.
de Vet, Henrica C.W.
de Bie, Robert A.
Kessels, Alphons G.H.
Boers, Maarten
Bouter, Lex M.
and
Knipschild, Paul G.
1998.
The Delphi List.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 12,
p.
1235.
Moher, David
Pham, Ba'
Jones, Alison
Cook, Deborah J
Jadad, Alejandro R
Moher, Michael
Tugwell, Peter
and
Klassen, Terry P
1998.
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?.
The Lancet,
Vol. 352,
Issue. 9128,
p.
609.
Clark, Michael
1998.
Removing the ‘Estimates And Guesses’ from Practice - Evidence Based Tissue Viability.
Journal of Tissue Viability,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
3.
Dealey, Carol
1998.
Obtaining the evidence for clinically effective wound care.
British Journal of Nursing,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 20,
p.
1236.
Saint, Sanjay
Elmore, Joann G
Sullivan, Sean D
Emerson, Scott S
and
Koepsell, Thomas D
1998.
The efficacy of silver alloy-coated urinary catheters in preventing urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis.
The American Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 105,
Issue. 3,
p.
236.
Henry, D.
Robertson, J.
O'connell, D.
and
Gillespie, W.
1998.
A systematic review of the skeletal effects of estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. I. An assessment of the quality of randomized trials published between 1977 and 1995.
Climacteric,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
92.
Moher, D.
and
Schulz, K.F.
1998.
Randomized controlled trials in cancer: Improving the quality of their reports will also facilitate better conduct.
Annals of Oncology,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 5,
p.
483.
Ioannidis, John PA
and
Lau, Joseph
1998.
Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?.
The Lancet,
Vol. 352,
Issue. 9128,
p.
590.
Vamvakas, E. C.
1999.
Risk Management in Blood Transfusion: The Virtue of Reality.
p.
147.
Berk, Paul D.
and
Sacks, Henry S.
1999.
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: Quality of design is not the only relevant variable.
Hepatology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
1332.
Ibrahim, Ezzeldin M.
and
Stuart, Robert K.
1999.
Evidence-Based Medicine for the New Millennium: Critical Appraisal and Pragmatic Approach.
Annals of Saudi Medicine,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
295.
Etminan, Mahyar
and
Levine, Mitchell
1999.
Interpreting Meta‐Analyses of Pharmacologic Interventions: The Pitfalls and How to Identify Them.
Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 6,
p.
741.
Lohr, Kathleen N.
and
Carey, Timothy S.
1999.
Assessing “Best Evidence”: Issues in Grading the Quality of Studies for Systematic Reviews.
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 9,
p.
470.
Bronfort, Gert
1999.
SPINAL MANIPULATION.
Neurologic Clinics,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 1,
p.
91.
Cleophas, Ton J.
1999.
Human Experimentation.
p.
90.
Kjaergard, Lise Lotte
Nikolova, Dimitrinka
and
Gluud, Christian
1999.
Randomized clinical trials inHepatology: Predictors of quality.
Hepatology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 5,
p.
1134.