Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:53:16.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A serial of novel four degrees of freedom parallel mechanisms with large rotational workspace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2014

Sheng Guo
Affiliation:
Robotics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
Wei Ye*
Affiliation:
Robotics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
Haibo Qu
Affiliation:
Robotics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
Dan Zhang
Affiliation:
Robotics and Automation Laboratory, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada
Yuefa Fang
Affiliation:
Robotics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, China
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: 10116304@bjtu.edu.cn

Summary

In this paper, a class of novel four Degrees of Freedom (DOF) non-overconstrained parallel mechanisms with large rotational workspace is presented based on screw theory. First, the conflict between the number of independent constraints applied on the moving platform and the number of kinematic limbs for 4-DOF non-overconstrained parallel mechanism is identified. To solve this conflict, the platform partition method is introduced, and two secondary platforms are employed in each of the parallel mechanisms. Then, the motion requirements of the secondary platforms are analyzed and all the possible kinematic chains are enumerated. The geometrical assembly conditions of all possible secondary limbs are analyzed and some typical non-overconstrained parallel mechanisms are generated. In each of the parallel mechanisms, a planetary gear train is used to connect both of the secondary platforms. The large rotational workspace of the moving platform is obtained due to the relative motion of the two secondary platforms. Finally, the kinematics analysis of a typical parallel mechanism is conducted.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Angeles, J., “The qualitative synthesis of parallel manipulators,” J. Mech. Des. J. Mech. Des. 126 (4), 617624 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kong, X. and Gosselin, C., “Type synthesis of 3T1R 4-dof parallel manipulators based on screw theory,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 20 (2), 181190 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gogu, G., “Structural synthesis of fully-isotropic parallel robots with schönflies motions via theory of linear transformations and evolutionary morphology,” Eur. J. Mech. A 26 (2), 242269 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Salgado, O., Altuzarra, O., Petuya, V.et al, “Type synthesis of a family of 3T1R fully-parallel manipulators using a group-theoretic approach,” In: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Besançon, France, (2007), pp. 538543.Google Scholar
5.Huang, Z., “The kinematics and type synthesis of lower-mobility parallel robot manipulators,” In: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Tianjin, China, (2004), pp. 6576.Google Scholar
6.Zlatanov, D. and Gosselin, C., “A new parallel architecture with four degrees of freedom,” In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Kinematics, Seoul, Korea, (2001), pp. 5766.Google Scholar
7.Jin, Q. and Yang, T. L., “Structure synthesis of parallel manipulators with 3-dimension translation and 1-dimension rotation,” In: Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada, DETC2002/MECH-34307.Google Scholar
8.Huang, Z. and Li, Q. C.. “General methodology for type synthesis of lower-mobility symmetrical parallel manipulators and several novel manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 21 (2), 131145 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Huang, Z. and Li, Q. C.. “Some novel lower-mobility parallel mechanisms,” In: Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Montreal, Canada, DETC2002/MECH-34299.Google Scholar
10.Fang, Y. F. and Tsai, L.-W., “Structure synthesis of a class of 4-dof and 5-dof parallel manipulators with identical limb structures,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 21 (9), 799810 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Fang, Y. F. and Tsai, L.-W., “Analytical identification of limb structures for translational parallel manipulators,” J. Robot. Syst. 21 (5), 209218 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Yang, T. L., “Topologies of Robot Mechanisms,” (Machine Industrial Press, Beijing, 2004).Google Scholar
13.Gao, F., Li, W. M., Zhao, X. C.et al, “New kinematic structures for 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-dof parallel manipulator designs,” Mech. Mach. Theory 37 (11), 13951411 (2002).Google Scholar
14.Merlet, J-P., “Parallel robot: open problems,” In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium of Robotics Research, Snowbird, (1999), pp. 912.Google Scholar
15.Fang, Y. F. and Tsai, L.-W., “Enumeration of a class of overconstrained mechanisms using the theory of reciprocal screws,” Mech. Mach. Theory 39 (11), 11751187 (2004).Google Scholar
16.Pierrot, F., Nabat, V., Company, O.et al, “Optimal design of a 4-dof parallel manipulator: from academia to industry,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 25 (2), 213224 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Pierrot, F. and Company, O., “H4: a new family of 4-dof parallel robots,” In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Atlanta, USA, (1999), pp. 508513.Google Scholar
18.Company, O., Krut, S. and Pierrot, F., “Internal singularity analysis of a class of lower mobility parallel manipulators with articulated traveling plate,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 22 (1): 111 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Rolland, L., “The manta and the kanuk: novel 4-dof parallel mechanisms for industrial handling,” In: Proceedings of ASME International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Nashville, USA, (1999), pp. 831844.Google Scholar
20.Krut, S., Company, O., Benoit, M.et al, “I4: A new parallel mechanism for scara motions,” In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, (2003), pp. 18751880.Google Scholar
21.Krut, S., Nabat, V., Company, O.et al, “A high-speed parallel robot for scara motions,” In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, USA, (2004), pp. 41094115.Google Scholar
22.Krut, S., Company, O., Coradini, C.et al, “Evalution of a 4-degree of freedom parallel manipulator stiffness,” In: Proceedings of the 11th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Tianjin, China, (2004), pp. 18571861.Google Scholar
23.Clavel, R., “Delta, a fast robot with parallel geometry,” In: Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Sydney, (1988), pp. 91100.Google Scholar
24.Angeles, J., Caro, S., Khan, W.et al, “The kinetostatic design of an innovative schönflies motion generator,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 220 (7), 935944 (2006).Google Scholar
25.Morozov, A. and Angeles, J., “The mechanical design of a novel Schönflies-motion generator,” Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 23 (1), 8293 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Guo, S., Fang, Y. F. and Qu, H. B.. 2012. “Type synthesis of 4-dof non-overconstrained parallel mechanisms based on screw theory,” Robotica, 30 (1), 3137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar