Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antón, M. (1999). A learner-centered classroom. Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antón, M. & DiCamilla, F. J. (1998). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 314–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, G. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Speaking as mediation: a study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 437–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belyayev, B. V. (1963). The psychology of teaching foreign languages. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Broner, M. & Tarone, E. (1999). Is it fun? Language play in a fifth grade Spanish immersion classroom. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Stamford, CT. March.Google Scholar

Brooks, E. B. & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77, 262–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, F. B., Donato, R. & McGlone, J. V. (1997). When are they going to say ‘it’ right?: understanding learner talk during pair-work activity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 523–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cazden, C. (1997). Performance before competence: assistance to child discourse in the zone of proximal development. In Cole, M., Engeström, Y., Vasquez, O., Mind, cultura, and activity. Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–10.Google Scholar

Cook, G. (1997). Language play and language learning. ELT Journal, 51, 224–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coughlan, P. & Duff, P. A. (1994). Same task, different activities: analysts of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G.Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning, 173–94.Google Scholar

Diaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (eds.) (1992). Private speech. From social interaction to self-regulation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

DiCamilla, F. J. & Antón, M. (1997). The function of repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiCamilla, F. J. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). The linguistic analysis of private writing. Language Sciences, 16, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. R Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33–56.Google Scholar

Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 29–52.Google Scholar

Donato, R. & Adair-Hauck, B. (1992). Discourse perspectives on formal instruction. Language Awareness, 1, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donato, R. & McCormick, D. (1994). A Sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: the role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 453–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, W. & Lantolf, J. P. (1998). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's i + 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories. Language Learning, 48, 411–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. (1999). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research (under review).Google Scholar

Foley, J. (1990). Task-based approaches to language learning from the learner's point of view. Language and Education, 4, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foley, J. (1991). A psycholinguistic framework for task-based approaches to language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 12, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frawley, W. J. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frawley, W. & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: a Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillette, B. (1994). The role of learner goals in L2 success. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 195–214.Google Scholar

Goss, N., Ying-Hua, Z. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Two heads may be better than one: mental activity in second-language grammaticality judgments. In Tarone, E., Gass, S., & Cohen, A. (eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 263–86.Google Scholar

Guerra, C. (1996). Krashen's i + 1 issue revisited from a Vygotskian perspective. TESOL-Gram (The Official Newsletter of Puerto RicoTESOL), 23, 7–8.Google Scholar

de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1987). The din phenomenon: mental rehearsal in the second language. Foreign Language Annals, 20, 537–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGuerrero, M. C. M. (1994). Form and function of inner speech in adult second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language learning, 83–116.Google Scholar

de Guerrero, M. C. M. (1999). Inner speech as mental rehearsal: the case of advanced L2 learners. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 10, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Guautero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. (1994). Social-cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revisions. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 484–96.Google Scholar

de Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. (2000). Activating the ZPD: mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1. Reason and the rationalisation of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Hall, J. K. (1995). “Aw, man, where you goin'?”: classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, J. K. (1997). A consideration of SLA as a theory of practice: a response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 301–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinginger, C. (1998). Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 502–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinginger, C. (in press). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In Hall, J. K. & Verplaeste, L. S. (eds.), The construction of foreign and second language learning through classroom interaction, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discourse constructions of self in L2 learning. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 135–56.Google Scholar

Kuczaj, Stan A. II (1983). Crib speech and language play. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (1997). The function of language play in the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. In Glass, W. R. & Perez-Leroux, A. T. (eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 3–24.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (1999). Theorizing the role of private speech as language play in the acquisition of a second language. Featured paper at the Annual Conference of the New Zealand Association of Applied Linguistics. Auckland. September.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (ed.) (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: a revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 619–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (eds.) (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Frawley, W. (1984). Second language performance and Vygotskyan psycholinguistics: implications for L2 instruction. In Manning, A., Martin, P. & McCalla, K. (eds.), The tenth LACUS forum 1983, Columbia, SC:Hornebeam Press, 425–40.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the language learning process. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (1991). Guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction, and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

McCafferty, S. (1994). The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language reseasrch, 117–34.Google Scholar

McCafferty, S. & Ahmed, A. (2000). The appropriation of gestures of the abstract by L2 learners. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 199–218.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand in mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Murphey, T. (1995). Conversational shadowing for rapport and interactional language acquisition. In Ahmed, M., Fujimura, T., Kato, Y. & Leong, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International University of Japan Conference on SLR in Japan, Nagoya: Nazan University, 42–65.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & Cumming, A. (in press). What's in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Langnage Teaching and Learning.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (in press). A Vygotskyan perspective towards corrective feedback in L2: the effect of random vs. negotiated help on the acquisition of English articles. Language Awareness.Google Scholar

Newman, D., Griffin, P. & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohta, A. S. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in learner-learner classroom interaction. In L. Bouton (ed.), Pragmatics and language tearning, volume 8, 223–42.Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. (2000). Re-thinking interaction in SLA: developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 53–80.Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. (in press a). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics.Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. (in press b). Japanese second language acquisition in the classroom: what the voices of teachers and students tell us about the process of learning Japanese. In Nara, H. (ed.), Advances in Japanese pedagogy, Columbus, OH: Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. (in press c). Re-thinking recasts: a learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In Hall, J. K. & Verplaeste, L. (eds.), The construction of foreign and second language learning through classroom interaction, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Platt, E. & Brooks, F. P. (1994). The acquisition-rich environment revisited. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 497–511.Google Scholar

Platt, E. & Troudi, S. (1997). Mary and her teachers: a Bregospeaking child's place in the mainstream classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 28–59.Google Scholar

Robbins, D. (1996). L. S. Vygotsky's philosophy-psychology used as a metatheory in defining L2 classroom acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar

Roebuck, R. (1998). Reading and recall in L1 and L2. A sociocultural approach. Stamford, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: how learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 81–98.Google Scholar

Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: a framework for the study of language and communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rommetveit, R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J.V. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, 183–204.Google Scholar

Salomon, G. (1991). On the cognitive effects of technology. In Landsman, L. T. (ed.), Culture, schooling and psychological development, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 185–204.Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M. (1988). Private speech: evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent’ period. Journal of Child Language, 15, 567–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schinke-Llano, L. (1993). On the value of a Vygotskian framework for SLA theory and research. Language Learning, 43, 121–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schinke-Llano, L. (1995). Reenvisioning the second language classroom: a Vygotskian approach. In Eckman, F. R., Highland, D., Lee, P. W. & Weber, R. W. (eds.). Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 21–8.Google Scholar

Sullivan, P. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in a Vietnamese classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 117–34.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics. Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–44.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 99–116.Google Scholar

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1999). Task-based language learning: the uses of first language use. Unpublished manuscript currently under review. Language Teaching Research.Google Scholar

Talyzina, N. (1981). The psychology of learning. Moscow: Progress Press.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. & Liu, G. (1995). Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition theory. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (eds.), Principie and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honour of H. G. Widdotvson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107–24.Google Scholar

Thorne, S. L. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. In Herron, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the thirty-third annual Hawai'i international conference sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar

Ushakova, T. N. (1994). Inner speech and second language acquisition: an experimental-theoretical approach. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 135–56.Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 247–62.Google Scholar

Villamil, O. & De Guerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Villamil, O. & De Guerrero, M. G. M. (1998). Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 19, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thc collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 1. Thinking and speaking. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 470–81.Google Scholar

Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar