Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:25:30.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Will one stage and no feedback suffice in lexicalization?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Trevor A. Harley
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotlandt.a.harley@dundee.ac.uk www.dundee.ac.uk/psychology/staff.htm#harley

Abstract

I examine four core aspects of weaver++. The necessity for lemmas is often overstated. A model can incorporate interaction between levels without feedback connections between them. There is some evidence supporting the absence of inhibition in the model. Connectionist modelling avoids the necessity of a nondecompositional semantics apparently required by the hypernym problem.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)