Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:50:46.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Central versus peripheral substrates of persistent pain: Which contributes more?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1997

Marshall Devor
Affiliation:
Department of Cell and Animal Biology, Life Sciences Institute, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel 91904 marshlu@vms.huji.ac.il

Abstract

Evidence that central sensitization needs to be maintained in an ongoing manner by nociceptive input from the periphery makes the peripheral drive, rather than the central amplification process, the highest priority target for understanding and control. To stop the peripheral drives to kill two birds with one stone. Moreover, the amplification that central sensitization does provide is selective and not necessarily striking in intensity. A “magic bullet” that neutralized central sensitization would probably be less effective in controlling persistent pain than many investigators would like to believe. [berkley; blumberg et al.; coderre & katz; dickenson; mcmahon; weisenfeld-hallin et al.]

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)