Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:39:34.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional versus real space: Is pictorialism hopeless?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2003

Verena Gottschling
Verena Gottschling
Affiliation:
Philosophisches Seminar, University of Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germanyverena@gottschling-net.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pylyshyn raises hot topics like the number and kinds of pictorialist theories there are and their explanatory power. Pylyshyn states that pictorialists have only two possibilities – they can posit either “only functional” images or “really spatial” images – and that neither of these possibilities is convincing or sufficient in explanatory power for empirical and theoretical reasons. Is pictorialism, in principle, untenable?

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 2002 , pp. 193 - 194
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)