Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Cousins, Eleri H.
2016.
An Imperial Image: The Bath Gorgon in Context.
Britannia,
Vol. 47,
Issue. ,
p.
99.
Article contents
The Temple of Sulis-Minerva at Bath
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
Extract
The Roman remains at Bath, dominated by the stately thermal establishment, have always been associated in geography and in archaeology with the goddess Sulis-Minerva. The famous pediment of her temple, found when the eighteenth-century Pump Room was built, has long been accounted one of the most remarkable manifestations of Romano-British art; its richly carved reliefs have always invited restoration; and they at once received it, somewhat sketchily from Englefield and most ingeniously from Samuel Lysons in 1802 (pl. XXIII). So convincing, indeed, was the main outline of Lyson's reconstruction that it held the field and remained the basis of all subsequent proposals, including that so carefully elaborated by the late A. J. Taylor. The discovery of the stones carried with it the site of the temple; for the blocks cannot have fallen far. It lay below the Pump Room, on the north side of the sacred pool whose copious hot springs were enclosed by the Romans in an irregular polygonal basin. The sanctity of the spring, which seems only later to have been roofed, is proved by the many coins and the leaden tablet inscribed with a curse which it contained, but, unlike many sacred pools, for example, that of Nemausus at Nîmes, it was not itself frequented by bathers. It could be viewed from the Baths through three great open windows on its south side; and these were of some architectural pretensions, the central member having a true arch, and the flanking pair (of which one survives (pl. XXIV, 2)) joggled flat arches, while the corridor within was furnished, as was no other part of the Baths, with fluted pilasters (pl. XXIV, 1).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © I. A. Richmond and J. M. C. Toynbee 1955. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
References
1 Haverfield, F., Vict. Co. Hist. Somerset, 1, 1906, 234–5Google Scholar, remains the best description.
2 SirEnglefield, H. C., Archaeologia, x, 1792, 325–33Google Scholar, pl. 30; read 3 March, 1791.
3 Lysons, S., Reliquiae Britannico-Romanae, 1, Remains of two temples and other Roman antiquities discovered at Bath, 1802, pl. 5Google Scholar.
4 The Roman Baths at Bath, 1933, plate facing P. 23.
5 Haverfield, F., VCH Som., I, 906, 250Google Scholar quoting Davis, Athenaeum, 15 May, 1880, 641.
6 EE VII, 827: the object lost is uncertain and the tablet itself has been cut down: the text is, in fact, hardly so complete as is often supposed.
7 Naumann, R., Der Quellbezirk von Nîmes, 1937 Taf. 1,2Google Scholar.
8 The fine character of the masonry is particularly notable, and compares with such work as the temple-precinct at Tarraco now visible in the Museo Diocesano.
9 Although joggled voussoirs might be assumed to be an early feature, arguments based upon this notion are invalidated by the magnificent flat arch of the Porta Aurea at Spalato, of Diocletianic date, in which are nine such stones, including a key-stone.
10 For Irvine's interpretation, see VCH Som., 1, 1906, 250, fig. 9.
11 For Mann's views, see his plans in Red Portfolio (Society of Antiquaries of London).
12 Englefield, l.c.: Lysons, o.c, pls. 1 and 3.
13 The refinements are lacking and the tori far from pure in shape: the tendency is reminiscent of transitional mouldings, as between Norman and Early English, in ecclesiastical architecture.
14 Cf. Kähler, H., Die römischen Kapitelle des Rheingebietes, 1939, pl. 11, M1, from TrierGoogle Scholar.
15 Cf. Haverfield, F., ‘Roman Cirencester,’ Archaeologia, LXIX, 1918, 190–3Google Scholar.
16 For example, the fine column now standing (not in its original position) to the north of Lucas Bath.
17 For the plan of the Maison Carrée cf. Simpson, F. M. A History of Architectural Development I, 1916, 133Google Scholar, fig. 83. Anderson, Spiers and Ashby, The Architecture of Ancient Rome, 1927, 73, fig. 17.
18 JRS v, 1915, pl. I; Frothingham, , Roman Cities in Northern Italy and Dalmatia, 1910, pl. XLIXGoogle Scholar.
19 For an excellent detail see Sautel, et Imbert, , Les villes romaines de la vallée du Rhône, 1926, 128Google Scholar.
20 Toebelmann, F., Römische Gebdäke, 1923, Atlas, pls. 14Google Scholar (Arcus Argentariorum), 10 (Forum Traiani), 12 (Templum Serapidis).
21 JRS II, 1912, 132. The description of the Bath sculptures given in JRS 11 is largely based on Haverfield's account of them in VCH Somerset, I, 1906, 229 ff.
22 ibid.
23 Pl. 5; cf. above, p. 97, note 3.
24 o.c., 134.
25 No. 165; Michaelis, A., Ancient Marbles in Great Britain, 1882, 568–9, no. 113Google Scholar; Chandler, R., Marmora Oxoniensia, 1763, no. 150, pl. 55Google Scholar.
26 Lehmann-Hartleben, K. and Olsen, E. C., Dionysiac Sarcophagi in Baltimore, 1942, fig. 27Google Scholar.
27 Taylor, A. J., The Roman Baths of Bath, 1954, fig. on p. 26Google Scholar.
28 o. c., pl. 4.
29 JRS II, 1912, 133.
30 Strong, E., La scultura romana, II, 1926, 259Google Scholar, fig. 166.
31 Devizes Museum Catalogue, II, 1934, 215, with plate.
32 Strong, o.c., 1, 1923, 11, fig. 5.
33 Hesperia XIX, 1950, pl. 62.
34 Bieber, M., Sculpture in the Hellenistic Age, 1955, fig. 656 (‘Icarius’), MAAR 111, 1919, pl. 75 (‘Citharoedus’)Google Scholar.
35 Africa Italiana IV, 1931, 65–7, figs. 36–8; JRS XXXVIII, 1948, 1, pl. IX, 1.
36 Strong, o.c., 11, 1926, pl. 60.
37 Haverfield, F., Catalogue of the Roman Inscribed and Sculptured Stones in the Carlisle Museum, Tullie House, 1922, no. 103, pl. facing p. 37Google Scholar.
38 Home, G., Roman York, 1924, pl. facing p. 54Google Scholar.
39 Roem. Mitt. XXVII, 1912, 109 f., pl. 4, fig. 2. The writers owe this reference to Hommel, P., Studien zuden röm. Figurengiebeln d. Kaiserzeit, 1954, 63–4Google Scholar.
40 Squarciapino, M., La scuola di Afrodisia, 1943, 68, pl. N, a.Google Scholar
41 Picard, C., Rev. Arch. ser. 6, XXXVII, 1951, 231–2Google Scholar. Cf. Collection Latomus 11 (Hommages a J. Bidez et F. Cumont), 1949, 257–64.
42 Squarciapino, o.c., pl. N, b; JRS XXXVIII, 1948, pl. IX, 4.
43 ibid., p. 83; Africa Italiana I, 1927, 60, fig. 6.
44 Picard, , Rev. Arch. ser. 6, XXXVII, 1951, p. 232Google Scholar, fig. 11.
45 Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot. LXVI, 1931–1932, 297–8, fig. 8.
46 Furtwängler, A., Antike Gemmen, 1900, 1 pl. 54Google Scholar.
47 , V. E. and Nash-Williams, A. H., Catalogue of the Roman Inscribed and Sculptured Stones found at Caerleon, Monmouthshire, 1935, 40, no. 91, pl. 16Google Scholar.
48 Webster, G., A Short Guide to the Roman Inscriptions and Sculptured Stones in the Grosvenor Museum, Chester, 1950, 30–1, no. 163Google Scholar. Cf. VCH Somerset, I, 1906, 236, note 2.
49 Brett, G., Macaulay, W. J., Stevenson, R. B. K., The Great Palace of the Byzantine Emperors, 1947, pl. 49Google Scholar.
50 Brailsford, J. W., The Mildenhall Treasure: a Handbook, 1955, pl. 1Google Scholar; Toynbee, J. M. C., ‘Some Notes on the Mildenhall Treasure’ in Wandlungen christlicher Kunst im Mittelalter, 1953, 45–6, fig. 2Google Scholar.
51 11 July 1946.
52 Lambrechts, P., L'exaltation de la tête dans la pensée et dans l'art des Celtes, 1952, fig. 58Google Scholar.
53 ibid., fig. 61.
54 von Blanckenhagen, P. H., Flavische Architektur und ihre Dekoration, 1940, pl. 39, fig. 104Google Scholar.
55 VCH Somerset, I, 1906, 242, fig. 22.
56 CIL VII, 37.
57 CIL XII, p. 383: ]ιαρται…λλανουιακος δεδε Ματρεβο Ναμαυσικαβο βρατουδε.
58 Roman Britain, 1932, 115.
59 CIL VII, 37.
60 Archaeologia LXIX, 1918, 180–2, fig. 7.
61 ILS 4661; VCH Somerset, I, 1906, 271 (17).
62 VCH Somerset, I, 1906, 267–8.
63 Collingwood, R. G. and Myres, J. N. L., Roman Britain and the English Settlements, ed. 2, 1937, 259Google Scholar.
- 1
- Cited by