Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:25:11.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Charles A. Ferguson
Charles A. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Stanford Univeristy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The language of sports casting is analyzed in terms of register variation. First the register is “located” by successive approximations to a characterization of its occasions of use, then selected syntactic characteristics are identified: simplification (deletion of copula and sentence initial nominals), inversions, heavy modifiers, result expressions (for + noun, to + verb), routines (e.g., giving the “count”). Some of these are discussed in relation to possible communicative functions, but all are seen as register markers. Sports announcer talk (SAT) is described as a promising topic for comparative, historical, and acquisitional studies of register variation. (Register, mass media, performance; American English, Japanese.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 153 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, E. S. (1977). Learning to speak with style: A study of the sociolinguistic skills of children. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (1977). Linguistics, anthropology, and verbal art: Toward a unified perspective, with a special discussion of children's folklore. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. 13–36.Google Scholar
Bloch, B. (1950). Studies in Colloquial Japanese IV: Phonemics. Language 26:86–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, E. (1966). The minor and fragmentary sentences of a corpus of spoken English. (= international Journal of American Linguistics 32(3), part II) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Close, R. A. (1962). English as a foreign language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (ed.) (1981). Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1974). An experiment involving comprehension of intonation in children from 7 to 10. Journal of Child Language 1:221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1975). The English tone of voice: Essays in intonation, prosody, and paralanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1976). Nonsegmental phonology in religious modalities. In Samarin, W. J. (ed), Language in religious practice. Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. Chapter 5. The language of unscripted commentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, J., & Ure, J. (1969). Language variety: Register. In Meetham, A. R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics, information, and control. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1982). Simplified registers and linguistic theory. In Obler, L. & Menn, L. (eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1976). The collect as a form of discourse. In Samarin, W. J. (ed), Language in religious practice. Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Talking to children. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (in press). Processes of simplification in discourse: The case of simplified registers. To appear in Discourse Processes.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D. (1981). Idiomaticity and functional variation: A case study of international amateur radio talk. Language in Society 10:21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Radio talk: A study of the ways of our errors. In Goffman, E., Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Green, G. M. (1980). Some wherefores of English inversions. Language 56:582–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. M. (1982). Colloquial and literary uses of inversion. In Tannen, D. (ed), Spoken and written language: Exploring oralily and literacy. Norwood N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gregory, H. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 3:177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1968). The users and uses of language. In Fishman, J. (ed), Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hartung, W., & Schzënfeld, H. (eds.) (1981). Kommunikation und Sprachvariation. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Haviland, J. B. (1979). Guugu Yimidhirr brother-in-law language. Language in Society 8:365–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzl, V. (1974). Linguistic register of foreign language instruction. Language Learning 23:207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirtle, W. H. (1967). The simple and progressive forms: An analytical approach. Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T. & Sturtevant, W. C. (eds.), Anthropology and human behavior. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language, its nature, development, and origin. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mảrdh, I. (1980). Headlinese: On the grammar of English front page headlines. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar
Neubert, A. (1974). What is sociolinguistics? Three postulates for sociolinguistic research. Paper presented at a sociolinguistic symposium, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1965). A linguistic study of the English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Scheffer, J. (1975). The progressive in English. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Sorhus, H. B. (1977). To hear ourselves – implications for teaching English as a second language. English Language Teaching Journal 31:211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, B. (1971). Headline classes in journalistic Spanish. An exercise in register analysis. Iberoromanica 3:174–87.Google Scholar
Straumann, H. (1935). Newspaper headlines. A study in linguistic method. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Treat, R. (ed.) (1968). The official encyclopedia of baseball. By Turkin, H. and Thompson., S. C. 4th rev. ed.Google Scholar
Ure, J. (1972). Register theory and compilation of corpus. In Report of the contemporary Russian language analysis project. Colchester: Language Centre, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Wallin, S. (1982). Sports reporting. A stylistic comparison between sports reporting and “ordinary news” reporting in four daily newspapers. Unpublished paper, Department of Linguistics, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
Weber, E. G. (1982). Going, going, gone: Verb forms in baseball sportscasting. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar