Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T23:34:09.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resource Allocation in the Welfare State: Bureaucrats or Prices?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See cover notes, Harris, Ralph and Seldon, Arthur, Pricing or Taxing?, Hobart Paper 71, IEA, London, 1976.Google ScholarPubMed

2 See Department of the Environment, The Rate Support Grant Order 1975, House of Commons Paper 31, HMSO, London, 1975, para. 21.Google Scholar

3 See letter from SirCrofton, Malby (Leader of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) in The Times, 8 May 1076.Google Scholar

4 See Dalton, Andrew et al. , A Chancellor's Primer, The Bow Group, London, 1976.Google Scholar

5 Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Local Government Finance (Layfield Report), Cmnd 6453, HMSO, London, 1976.Google Scholar

6 Local Government Finance, Cmnd 6813, HMSO, London, 1977, pp. 20–1.Google Scholar

7 Seldon, Arthur, Charge, Temple Smith, London, 1977, p. 30.Google Scholar

8 Department of Health and Social Security, Social Assistance: A Review of the Supplementary Benefits Scheme in Great Britain, London, 1978.Google Scholar

9 Judge, Ken, Rationing Social Services: A Study of Resource Allocation in the Personal Social Services, Heinemann, London, 1978, pp. 56.Google Scholar

10 Parker, R. A., ‘Social Administration and Scarcity’, Social Work, 04 1967.Google Scholar

11 Hall, A. S., The Point of Entry: A Study of Client Reception in the Personal Social Services, Allen and Unwin, London, 1975, p. 139.Google Scholar

12 Supplementary Benefits Commission, Annual Report 1976, Cmnd 6910, HMSO, London, 1977, p. 111.Google Scholar

13 Taylor, T. R., Aitchison, J., Parker, L. S. and Moore, M. F., ‘Individual Differences in Selecting Patients for Regular Haemodialysis’, British Medical Journal, 17 05 1975, 380–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

14 See Toynbee, Polly, ‘Guardian Women’, The Guardian, 18 12 1978.Google Scholar

15 See Hunt, Audrey, The Home Help Service in England and Wales, HMSO, London, 1970Google Scholar; and Marks, J., Home Help, George Bell and Sons, London, 1975.Google Scholar

16 Foster, Peggy, ‘The Informal Rationing of Primary Medical Care’, journal of Social Policy, forthcoming.Google Scholar

17 See National Consumer Council, Access, Allocation and Transfers in Council Housing: The National Consumer Council's Response to the Department of the Environment Consultation Paper, 1977, unpublished.Google Scholar

18 Heclo, Hugh and Wildavsky, Aaron, The Private Government of Public Money, Macmillan, London, 1974.Google Scholar

19 Glennerster, Howard, Social Services Budgets and Social Policy, Allen and Unwin, London, 1975.Google Scholar

20 Judge, , Rationing Social Services.Google Scholar

21 Niskanen, William A. Jr, Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Aldinc-Atherton, Chicago, 1971.Google Scholar

22 Leibenstein, H., ‘Allocative Efficiency versus X-Efficiency’, American Economic Review, 56 (1966).Google Scholar

23 Niskanen, William A. Jr, Bureaucracy: Servant or Master?, Hobart Paperback 5, IEA, 1973Google Scholar; Tullock, Gordon, The Vote Motive, Hobart Paperback 9, IEA, 1976Google Scholar; and Buchanan, James M. et al. , The Economics of Politics, Readings 18, IEA, 1978.Google Scholar

24 See Brown, C. V. and Jackson, P. M., Public Sector Economics, Martin Robertson, London, 1978, ch. 2.Google Scholar

25 Rowley, Charles K. and Peacock, Alan T., Welfare Economics: A liberal Restatement, Martin Robertson, London, 1975, p. 31.Google Scholar

26 See Zerbe, Richard O., ‘The Problem of Social Cost: Fifteen Years Later’, in Lin, Steven A. T. (ed.), Theory and Measurement of Externalities, Academic Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar

27 See Head, John G., Public Goods and Public Welfare, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, 1974.Google Scholar

28 See the classification in Seldon, op. cit. pp. 44–8.

29 Ibid. p. 53.

30 Ibid., et seq.

31 Peacock, Alan T. and Wiseman, Jack, Education for Democrats, Hobart Paper 25, IEA, 1964.Google Scholar

32 Prest, A. R., Financing University Education, Occasional Paper 12, IEA, 1966.Google Scholar

33 Peacock, Alan T. and Culyer, Anthony J., Economic Aspects of Student Unrest, Occasional Paper 26, IEA, 1969.Google Scholar

34 Maynard, Alan, Experiment with Choice in Education, Hobart Paper 64, IEA, 1975.Google Scholar

35 Crew, Michael A. and Young, Alistair, Paying by Degrees, Hobart Paper 75, IEA, 1977.Google Scholar

36 Lees, D. S., ‘Health Through Choice’, in Harris, Ralph (ed.), Freedom or Free-for-All?, Hobart Papers, Vol. 3, IEA, 1965.Google Scholar

37 Buchanan, James M., The Inconsistencies of the National Health Service, Occasional Paper 7, IEA, 1965.Google Scholar

38 Seldon, Arthur, After the NHS, Occasional Paper 21, IEA, 1968.Google Scholar

39 Carmichael, John, Vacant Possession, Hobart Paper 28, IEA, 1964.Google Scholar

40 Fulop, Christina, Markets for Employment, Research Monograph 26, IEA, 1971.Google Scholar

41 A. P. Herbert, Libraries: Free-for-All?, in Harris, op. cit.

42 Carter, R. L., Theft in the Market, Hobart Paper 60, IEA, 1974.Google Scholar

43 Judge, Ken, ‘An Introduction to the Economic Theory of Pricing’, in Judge, Ken (ed.), Social Policy and the Market, Macmillan, forthcoming.Google Scholar

44 See Brown and Jackson, op. cit. pp. 18–20.

45 Crew and Young, op. cit. p. 18, note 1.

46 Lees, op. cit. p. 44.

47 Collard, David, Altruism and Economy: A Study in Non-Selfish Economics, Martin Robertson, London, 1978.Google Scholar

48 Seldon, , Charge, p. 52.Google Scholar

49 Probably the most explicit example of the difference between the external benefit and income maintenance subsidies can be found in the school meals service. All consumers receive a partial subsidy probably designed to reflect the positive flow of consumption externalities, whereas a subgroup of consumers from low-income families receive an additional subsidy in pursuit of income maintenance objectives in the form of free meals. For a sophisticated economic analysis of this service area, see Bleddyn Davies, in association with Reddin, Michael, Universality, Selectivity and Effectiveness in Social Policy, Heinemann, London, 1978.Google Scholar

50 See Hartley, Keith, Problems of Economic Policy, Allen and Unwin, London, 1977, pp. 142–5.Google Scholar

51 Thurow, Lester C., ‘Government Expenditures: Cash or In-Kind Aid?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5: 4 (1976).Google Scholar

52 Alchian, Armen A., Pricing and Society, Occasional Paper 17, IEA, 1969, p. 9.Google Scholar

53 See Galbraith, J. K., ‘Economics in the Industrial State: Science and Sedative’, American Economic Review, 60 (1970)Google Scholar, Papers and Proceedings; and Gintis, Herbert, ‘Consumer Behaviour and the Concept of Sovereignty: Explanations of Social Decay’, American Economic Review, 62 (1972)Google Scholar, Papers and Proceedings.

54 Weale, Albert, ‘Paternalism and Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 7: 2 (1978).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

55 Stigler, George J., The Intellectual and the Market Place, Occasional Paper 1, IEA, 1963.Google Scholar

56 For example, in his discussion of the Canadian experience. Bird writes, ‘Once a set of ideas – for example, that most public services should be provided free and that most public prices are regressive – is embodied in the public psyche, it is, as a rule, singularly difficult to dislodge it’ – Bird, Richard M., Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto, 1976, p. 239.Google Scholar

57 Parker, R. A., ‘Charging for the Social Services’, Journal of Social Policy, 5: 4 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 Judge, Ken and Matthews, James, Pricing Policy and the Local Authority Social Services, a report prepared for the Department of Health and Social Security, 1978Google Scholar. A revised version will be published by Allen and Unwin during 1980.