Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:22:02.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodernism and Social Policy: A Small Step Forwards?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Sue Penna  and
Martin O'Brien
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The term ‘postmodernism’ has recently entered the study of social policy, prompting debate over its usefulness for social policy analysis. Peter Taylor-Gooby's (1994) appraisal of literatures often described as ‘postmodern’ leads him to reject them as having little to offer the discipline of social policy. This article argues that such a view derives from a confusion about the field of ‘postmodernism’; in particular, from a conflation of several different theoretical positions and schools of thought. This article provides a clarification of these literatures in order to argue that the issues they raise have important implications for the way in which we might understand the prospects for policy formulation and implementation. The article distinguishes between the political economy strand of the ‘post’ literatures – postindustrialism and postfordism – and the cultural studies strand – poststructuralism and postmodernism – showing that the different issues they highlight, and the ways in which they conceptualise power and control will lead to different theoretical connections between social policy and political action.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 39 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Azmeh, A. (1993), Islams and Modernities, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Albritton, R. (1993), ‘Marxian political economy for an age of postmodern excess’, Rethinking Marxism, Spring, 24–43.Google Scholar
Aglietta, M. (1979), A Theory of Capitalist Regulation, New Left Books, London.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (1992), ‘Post-industrialism and post-Fordism’, in Hall, S., Held, D. and McGrew, T. (eds.), Modernity and Its Futures, Open University Press/Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ashford, D. E. (1986), The Emergence of the Welfare States, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bagguley, P. (1991), ‘Post-Fordism and enterprise culture: flexibility, autonomy and changes in economic organisation’, in Keat, R. and Abercrombie, N. (eds.). Enterprise Culture, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. (ed.) (1992), Social Europe, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1993), ‘Racism, anti-racism and moral progress’, Arena, 1: 9–21.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1993a), Postmodern Ethics, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, G. (1994), ‘Who fancies Pakis?' Pamella Bordes and the problems of exoticism in multiracial Britain’, in Ledger, S., McDonagh, J., and Spencer, J. (eds.), Political Gender: Texts and Contexts, Harvester/Wheatsheaf, Herts.Google Scholar
Brah, A. (1992), ‘Difference, diversity and differentiation’, in Donald, J. and Rattansi, A., (eds.), ‘Race’, Culture, Difference, Open University Press and Sage, London.Google Scholar
Burrows, R. and Loader, B. (1994) (eds.), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Carabine, J. (1992), ‘Constructing women': women's sexuality and social policy’, Critical Social Policy, 34: 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, A. (1994) ‘Restructuring the local welfare state’, in Burrows, R. and Loader, B. (eds.), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (1985), Visions of Social Control, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Esping-Anderson, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Franklin, R. S. (1993/1994), ‘The post-industrial paradox: growing class inequalities, declining class politics’. Critical Sociology, 20: 1.Google Scholar
Frazer, E. and Lacey, N. (1993), The Politics of Community, Harvester/Wheatsheaf, Herts.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (1985), Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. (1978), After Industrial Society? The Emerging Self-service Economy, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity, Blackwell, Oxford and Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity. Blackwell, Oxford and Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. (1982), Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay in Post-industrial Socialism, Pluto, London.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. (1989), Critique of Economic Reason, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Gould, A. (1993), Capitalist Welfare Systems: A Comparison of Japan, Britain and Sweden, Longman, London.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1992), ‘The question of cultural identity’, in Hall, S., Held, D. and McGrew, T. (eds.), Modernity and Its Futures, Open University Press and Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1992a), ‘New ethnicities’, in Donald, J. and Rattansi, A. (eds.) ‘Race’. Culture and Difference. Open University Press and Sage, London.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1993), ‘Class relations, social justice and the politics of difference’, in Squires, J. (ed.). Principled Positions. Postmodernism and the Rediscovery of Value, Lawrence and Wishart, London.Google Scholar
Hay, C., O'Brien, M. and Penna, S. (1994). ‘Giddens, modernity and self-identity: the ‘hollowing-out’ of social theory’, Arena, 2: 45–75.Google Scholar
Holden, B. (1993), Understanding Liberal Democracy, 2nd edn, Harvester/Wheatsheaf, Herts.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1994), ‘The transition to post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare statc’, in Burrows, R. and Loader, B. (eds.), Towards and post-Fordist Welfare State? Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Morris, J. (1991), ‘Us' and ‘them’? Feminist research, community care and disability’, Critical Social Policy, 33: 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. (1984), Contradictions of the Welfare State, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1985), Disorganised Capitalism, Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pinch, S. (1994), ‘Labour flexibility and the changing welfare state: is there a post-Fordist model?’, in Burrows, R. and Loader, B., (eds.), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Pierson, C. (1991), Beyond The Welfare State? Blackwell, Oxford and Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roediger, D. R. (1994), Towards The Abolition of Whiteness, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Scott, A. (1992), ‘Political culture and social movements’, in Allen, J., Braham, P. and Lewis, P. (eds.), Political and Economic Forms of Modernity, Open University Press and Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smart, B. (1993), Postmodernity, Routledge, London, ch. 1.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. (1993), ‘Challenges from the margins’, in Clarke, J. (ed.), A Crisis in Care? Challenges to Social Work, Open University Press and Sage, London.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1994), ‘Postmodernism and social policy: a great leap backwards?’ Journal Social Policy, 23: 3, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. (1992), ‘Social pluralism and post-modernity’, in Hall, S., et al. (eds.). Modernity and Its Futures, Open University and Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. (1974), The Post-Industrial Society, Wildwood, London.Google Scholar
Vieux, S. (1994), ‘In the shadow of neo-liberal racism’, Race and Class, 36: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, H. (1994), Arguments for a New Left: Responding to the Free Market Right, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (1993), ‘Gender, ‘race’ and class in British welfare policy’, in Cochrane, A., Clarke, J. (eds.), Comparing Welfare States: Britain in International Context, Open University/Sage, London.Google Scholar
Yeatman, A. (1994). Postmodern Revisionings of The Political, Routledge, London.Google Scholar