Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:37:26.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Vernon Van Dyke
Vernon Van Dyke
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Abstract

Liberal political theory and contemporary expositions of human rights focus largely on the individual. Some liberal theorists even deny that ethnic communities and other groups, as collective entities, can have moral rights at all. The outlook is narrow and unfortunate. It reflects a preoccupation with domestic politics and a model of domestic politics that neglects the common fact of heterogeneity. It ignores widespread practices and urgent problems, for in many countries groups identified by race, language, or religion make moral claims, and their claims are sometimes conceded. It ignores the common view that nations or “peoples” have a (moral) right of self-determination, and it even leaves the state itself without justification. If theory is to give adequate guidance, its focus must be broadened. The question of group rights needs to be explored, and interrelationships between the rights of individuals, of groups, and of the state need to be clarified.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , April 1977 , pp. 343 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Though not presuming to classify Dante Germino ideologically, I might cite his statement that “the primary purpose of a political philosopher is to explore the individual's relationship to society. …” See his contribution, “The Contemporary Relevance of the Classics of Political Philosophy,” in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Political Science: Scope and Theory, Vol. 1, Handbook of Political Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1975), 259Google Scholar.

2 Cf. Ginsberg, Morris, On Justice in Society (Ithaca:Cornell University Press 1965), 74–75Google Scholar; Benn, S. I. and Peters, R. S., The Principles of Political Thought (New York: Free Press 1965), 107Google Scholar–16.

3 Cf. Gierke, Otto, Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500 to 1800, trans, with an introduction by Ernest Barker (Cambridge [England]:At the University Press 1934Google Scholar), I, lxiv, lxxxvii, 174, 175; Maitland, Frederic William, Collected Papers (Cambridge [England]:At the University Press 1911), III, 304Google Scholar–20; Cohen, Morris R., Reason and Nature: An Essay on the Meaning of Scientific Method (2nd ed., Glencoe, Ill.:Free Press 1953), 388Google Scholar–97; Laski, Harold J., “Morris Cohen's Approach to Legal Philosophy,” University of Chicago Law Review, xv (Spring 1948), 577Google Scholar–82; Webb, Leicester C., “Corporate Personality and Political Pluralism,” in Webb, , ed., Legal Personality and Political Pluralism (Melbourne:Melbourne University Press 1958), 45–65Google Scholar; Jellema, Dirk, “Abraham Kuyper's Attack on Liberalism,” Review of Politics, xix (October 1957), 482Google Scholar–85; Zylstra, Bernard, From Pluralism to Collectivism: The Development of Harold Last's Political Thought (Assen, The Netherlands:Van GorcumGoogle Scholar 19.68), 25, 38–39, 50–53.

4 Hobbes's Leviathan (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1909), chap, xviii, 133Google Scholar.

5 Sabine, George H., A History of Political Theory (New York:Holt 1950), 475Google Scholar.

6 Barker, Ernest, ed., Social Contract: Essays by Locke, Hume, and Rousseau (New York:Oxford University Press 1962), 56–57Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., 194.

8 Dyke, Van, “Justice as Fairness: For Groups?” American Political Science Review, Vol. 69 (June 1975), 607CrossRefGoogle Scholar–14.

9 “Barker (fn. 6), 272–73.

10 Ibid., xii.

11 Mill, John Stuart, Considerations on Representative Government (Indianapolis:Bobbs-Merrill 1958), 230Google Scholar, 233.

12 Barker, Ernest, Principles of Social & Political Theory (Oxford:Clarendon Press 1950, 3. 42Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., 55.

14 Ibid., 56.

15 Ibid., 139.

16 Ibid., 71.

17 Cf. the definition of a right offered by Plamenatz: “A right is a power which a creature ought to possess, either because its exercise by him is itself good or else because it is a means to what is good, and in the exercise of which all rational beings ought to protect him.” Plamenatz, J. P., Consent, Freedom, and Political Obligation (London:Oxford University Press 1938), 82Google Scholar.

18 Dyke, Van, “Human Rights and the Rights of Groups,” American Journal of Political Science, xviii (November 1974), 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar–41.

19 Great Britain. Parliamentary Papers. Inter-territorial Organisation in East Africa. Colonial No. 191 (December 1945), 8.

20 Cf. Tanganyika, . Report of the Committee on Constitutional Development 1951 (Dar es Salaam:Government Printer 1951), 2Google Scholar, 18–19; Pratt, Cranford, “Multi-Racialism and Local Government in Tanganyika,” Race, 11 (November 1960), 35–36Google Scholar; Tandon, Yash, “A Political Survey,” in Ghai, Dharam P., ed., Portrait of a Minority: Asians in East Africa (Nairobi:Oxford University Press 1965), 79Google Scholar.

21 Cf. Van Dyke, , “One Man One Vote and Majority Rule as Human Rights,” Revue des Droits de I'Homme, vi, Nos. 3–4 (1973), 456Google Scholar–58.

22 Britain, Great. Fiji Independence Order 1970Google Scholar, “The Constitution of Fiji,” Articles 45 and 68.

23 Senelle, Robert, “The Revision of the Constitution, 1967–1971,” Memo From Belgium, Nos. 144–145–146, January-February-March, 1972Google Scholar (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, External Trade and Cooperation in Development), 130.

24 Native American Church v. Navajo Tribal Council, 272 F. 2d 131 (10th Cir. 1959). U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor, , Handbook of Federal Indian Law, by Cohen, Felix S. (Washington 1942), 122Google Scholar–23, 278.

25 United States v. Carotene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938), at 153, fn. 4.

26 Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1951), at 262.

27 United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F. 2d 836 (1966), at 866, quoting Note, University of Chicago Law Review, xx (1953), 577.

28 Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Independent School Dist., 324 F. Supp. 599 (1970), at 606, 627; United States v. State of Texas, 342 F. Supp. 24 (1971), at 24.

29 Hunter v. Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969), at 393.

30 Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U.S. 475 (1954) at 478. United States v. Hunt, 265 F. Supp. 178 (1967), at 188.

31 Cousins v. City Council of City of Chicago, 466 F. 2d 830 (1972), at 843, 851. Cf. Sims v. Baggett, 247 F. Supp. 103 (1965); Howard v. Adams County Board of Supervisors, 453 F. 2d 455 (1972), at 457; Graves v. Barnes, 343 F. Supp. 704 (1972), at 728, 730; Klahr v. Williams, 339 F. Supp. 922 (1972), at 927; White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (1972), at 765; Beer v. United States, 374 F. Supp. 363 (1974), at 393.

32 Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (1968), at 39; emphasis added.

33 See, for example, Officers for Justice v. Civil S. Com'n, C. & C. San Francisco, 371 F. Supp. 1328 (1973), at 1332.

34 Fiss, , “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, v (Winter 1976), 157Google Scholar.

35 Council of Europe, Consultative Assembly, Sixteenth Ordinary Session, Resolution 290 (1965).

36 E/CN.4/Sub.2/40/Rev.1 (June 1949), 2. Cf. E/CN.4/641 (25 October 1951).

37 Michla Pomerance, “The United States and Self-Determination: Perspectives on the Wilsonian Conception,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 70 (January 1976), 2.

38 A/Res/3375, XXX (13 November 1975); emphasis added.

39 Nisbet, Robert A., The Quest for Community (New York:Oxford University Press 1953Google Scholar).

40 United Jewish Org. of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Wilson, 377 F. Supp. 1164 (1974); 500 F. 2d 434 (1974).

41 Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).

42 Walker Connor, “Ethnic Nationalism as a Political Force,” World Affairs, Vol. 133 (September 1970), 91–98; Connor, “Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying?” World Politics, xxiv (April 1972), 320; Connor, “The Politics of Ethnonationalism,” Journal of International Affairs, xxvii, No. 1 (1973), 1–2.