Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:39:17.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms underlying memory impairment in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1997

G. BRÉBION
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University and the Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
X. AMADOR
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University and the Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
M. J. SMITH
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University and the Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
J. M. GORMAN
Affiliation:
New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University and the Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate mechanisms underlying commonly-observed verbal memory impairments in schizophrenia, and especially the hypothesized encoding deficit.

Methods. A verbal memory task was administered to 38 patients with schizophrenia and 38 normal controls. Three functions involved in long-term memory – encoding, early phase of storage, retrieval – were investigated. First, non-organizable lists were compared to semantically-organizable lists in a free recall task, in order to vary encoding conditions. Superficial encoding (measured by a ‘sequence’ index) and deep encoding (measured by a categorization index) were assessed. Secondly, early storage was investigated by varying the delay between learning and recall. Lastly, cues were provided for organizable lists (semantic cues) and non-organizable lists (recognition sheet), in order to vary retrieval conditions.

Results. An analysis of variance revealed an interaction between type of list (organizable, non-organizable) and group, showing that patients used organization less than controls. A further analysis showed that deep encoding was impaired. Also, although the propensity to use superficial encoding was unimpaired, its efficiency was less. The analysis of variance revealed no interaction with delay or with either type of cue. A correlation was found between deep processing and memory performance in both groups.

Conclusions. A major deficit in encoding appeared in the patient group, with a lesser use of deep encoding and a lesser efficiency of superficial encoding. On the other hand, the early phase of storage and the retrieval function seemed unaffected. Overall memory performance appeared to be related to the depth of encoding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)