Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T15:27:12.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Literature and Philosophy: Emotion and Knowledge?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2004

Isabella Wheater
Affiliation:
Keble College, Oxford

Abstract

Nussbaum attempts to undermine the sharp distinction between literature and philosophy by arguing that literary texts (tragic poetry particularly) distinctively appeal to emotion and imagination, that our emotional response itself is cognitive, and that Aristotle thought so too. I argue that emotional response is not cognitive but presupposes cognition. Aristotle argued that we learn from the mimesis of action delineated in the plot, not from our emotional response. The distinctions between emotional and intellectual writing, poetry and prose, literature and philosophy, the imaginative and the unimaginative do not cut along the same lines. That between literature and philosophy is not hard and fast: philosophy can be dramatic (eg Plato's dialogues) and drama can be philosophical (eg some of Shakespeare's plays), but whether either is emotional or not, or written in poetry or prose, are other questions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)