Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T09:42:34.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replies to Three Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Colin Radford
Colin Radford
Affiliation:
University of Kent at Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 64 , Issue 247 , January 1989 , pp. 93 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘On Being Moved by Fiction’, Philosophy (01 1985)Google Scholar; replying to my ‘How can we be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume XLIX (07 1975).Google Scholar

2 ‘The Essential Anna’, Philosophy 54 (1979).Google Scholar

3 ‘Hanfling and Radford on Art and Real Life’, Philosophy 60 (1985).Google Scholar

4 ‘Literary Examples and Philosophical Confusion’, Philosophy and Literature, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series: 16, A. Phillips Griffiths, (ed.), pp. 59–74.Google Scholar