Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:23:11.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moore's Appeal To Common Sense1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Alan R. White
Affiliation:
University of Hull

Extract

I believe that Moore's appeal to common sense has been misunder-stood both by his defenders and his critics. Besides the mistakes of the latter, there is one enormous howler which, in my opinion, the former have committed. This is to confuse or coalesce two quite distinct appeals which he made, namely the appeal to common sense and the appeal to ordinary language.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

I list only the items referred to in my article; a full bibliography is given in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (1942, second edition in 1952) edited by Schilpp, P. A. (Tudor Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
1900Necessity”. Mind, IX, pp. 289304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1901a “Identity”. P.A.S., I, pp. 103–27. (P.A.S. = Proceedings of the Aris-totelian Society.)Google Scholar
1901b “The value of religion”. Inter. Journ. of Ethics, XII, pp. 8198.Google Scholar
1902a “Mr. McTaggart's ‘Studies in Hegelian Cosmology’”. P.A.S., II, pp. 177214.Google Scholar
1902b Baldwin, 's Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology.Google Scholar
1903a Principia Ethica. Cambridge.Google Scholar
1903c “Mr. McTaggart's Ethics.” Intern. Journ. of Ethics, XIII, pp. 341–70.Google Scholar
1905The nature and reality of objects of perception”. P.A.S., VI, pp. 68127.Google Scholar
1909a Hume's Philosophy in The New Quarterly (pagination from Philo-sophical Studies, 1922).Google Scholar
1910 Some main problems of philosophy (published in 1953). London.Google Scholar
1912 Ethics. London.Google Scholar
1914The status of sense-data”. P.A.S., XIV, pp. 355–80.Google Scholar
1917a “Are the materials of sense affections of the mind?P.A.S., XVII, pp. 418–29.Google Scholar
1918Some judgements of perception”. P.A.S., XIX, pp. 129.Google Scholar
1919a “Is there ‘knowledge by acquaintance’?P.A.S., Suppl. II, pp. 179–93.Google Scholar
1919b “External and internal relations”. P.A.S., XX, pp. 4062.Google Scholar
1921The character of cognitive acts”. P.A.S., XXI, pp. 132–40.Google Scholar
1925 “A defence of common sense” (Contemporary British Philosophy II), London.Google Scholar
1926The nature of sensible appearances”. P.A.S., Suppl. VI, pp. 179–89.Google Scholar
1929Indirect Knowledge”. P.A.S., Suppl. IX, pp. 1950.Google Scholar
1939Proof of an external world”. Proc. Brit. Acad., XXV, pp. 273—300.Google Scholar
1942 “Autobiography and reply to critics”. (The Philosophy of G. E. Moore). Evanston.Google Scholar