Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:50:48.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lipoprotein atherogenicity: an overview of current mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Bruce A. Griffin
Bruce A. Griffin*
Affiliation:
Centre for Nutrition and Food Safety, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Bruce A. Griffin, fax +44 (0)1483 259724, email B.Griffin@surrey.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Raised serum cholesterol does not adequately explain the increased risk of CHD within populations or the relationship between diet and CHD. Nevertheless, the principal transport vehicle of cholesterol in the circulation, LDL, must still be regarded as the most atherogenic lipoprotein species, but not because of its contribution to serum cholesterol. The atherogenic potential of LDL in the majority of individuals arises from an increase in the number of small dense LDL particles and not from its cholesterol content per se. There is now a wealth of evidence from cross-sectional and prospective studies to show that LDL particle size is significantly associated with CHD and predictive of increased coronary risk. Moreover, there are a number of credible mechanisms to link small dense LDL with the atherogenic process. The rate of influx of serum lipoproteins into the arterial wall is a function of particle size, and will thus be more rapid for small dense LDL. Components of the extracellular tissue matrix in the intima, most notably proteoglycans, selectively bind small dense LDL with high affinity, sequestering this lipoprotein in a pro-oxidative environment. The oxidation of LDL promotes the final deposition of cholesterol in the arterial wall, and numerous studies have shown small dense LDL to be more susceptible to oxidative modification than its larger and lighter counterparts. An increase in the number of small dense LDL particles may originate from a defect in the metabolism of triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins. One mechanism may involve the overproduction and increased residence time of large triacylglycerol-rich VLDL in the postprandial phase, a situation thought to arise through pathways of insulin resistance.

Keywords

TriacyiglycerolsSmall dense LDLCHDPostprandial metabolism
Type
Micronutrient Group Symposium on ‘Dietary determinants of lipoprotein-mediated cardiovascular risk’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 163 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1999

References

Anber, V, Griffin, BA, McConnell, M, Packard, CJ & Shepherd, J (1996) Influence of plasma lipid and LDL-subfraction profile on the interaction between low density lipoprotein with human arterial wall proteoglycans. Atherosclerosis 124, 261–271.Google Scholar
Anitshkow, N (1913) Changes in rabbit aorta due to experimentally induced cholesterolsteatosis. Beitrage zur pathologishen Antatomie und zur allegemeinen Pathologie 56, 379–404.Google Scholar
Assman, GM, Schulte, H, von Eckardstein, A & Huang, Y (1996) High density lipoprotein cholesterol is a predictor of coronary heart disease risk. The PROCAM experience and pathophysiological implications for reverse cholesterol transport. Atherosclerosis 124, Suppl., S11–S20.Google Scholar
Austin, MA, Breslow, JL, Hennekens, CH, Burling, JE, Willett, WC & Krauss, RM (1988) Low density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association 260, 1917–1921.Google Scholar
Austin, MA, King, MC, Vranizan, KM & Krauss, RM (1990) Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. A proposed genetic marker for coronary heart disease. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis 82, 495–506.Google Scholar
Bjorkegren, J, Packard, CJ, Hamsten, A, Bedford, D, Caslake, MJ, Foster, L, Shepherd, J, Stewart, P & Karpe, F (1996) Accumulation of large very low density lipoprotein in plasma during intravenous infusion of a chylomicron-like triglyceride emulsion reflects competition for a common lipolytic pathway. Journal of Lipid Research 37, 76–86.Google Scholar
Brown, MS, Faust, JR & Goldstein, JL (1975) Role of the low density lipoprotein receptor in regulating the content of free and esterified cholesterol in human fibroblasts. Journal of Clinical Investigation 55, 783–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castelli, WP (1984) Epidemiology of coronary heart disease: The Framingham study. American Journal of Medicine 76, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Despres, JP & Marette, A (1994) Relation of components of insulin resistance syndrome to coronary heart disease risk. Current Opinion in Lipidology 5, 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, RM, Coppack, SW, Gibbons, GF & Frayn, KN (1993) Post-prandial VLDL subfraction metabolism in normal and obese subjects. International Journal of Obesity 17, 263–269.Google Scholar
Fruchart, JC & Packard, CJ (1997) Is cholesterol the major lipoprotein risk factor in coronary heart disease? - a Franco-Scottish overview. Current Medical Research and Opinion 13, 603–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galeano, NF, Milne, R, Marcel, YL, Walsh, MT, Levy, E, Ngu'yen, TD, Gleeson, A, Arad, Y, Witte, L, Al-Haideri, M, Rumsey, SC & Deckelbaun, RJ (1994) Apoprotein B structure and receptor recognition of triglyceride-rich low density lipoprotein (LDL) is modified in small, dense LDL but not in triglyceride-rich LDL of normal size. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269, 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, CD, Fortmann, SP & Krauss, RM (1996) Association of small, low-density lipoprotein particles with the incidence of coronary artery disease in men and women. Journal of the American Medical Association 276, 875–881.Google Scholar
Gofman, JW, Lindgren, F, Elliott, H, Mantz, W, Hewitt, J, Strisower, B & Herring, V (1950) The role of lipids and lipoproteins in atherosclerosis. Science 111, 166–186.Google Scholar
Goldstein, JL, Ho, YK, Basu, SK & Brown, MS (1979) Binding site on macrophages that mediates uptake and degradation of acetylated low density lipoprotein, producing massive cholesterol deposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76, 333–337.Google Scholar
Griffin, BA (1997) Low-density lipoprotein subclasses: mechanisms of formation and modulation. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 56, 693–702.Google Scholar
Griffin, BA, Freeman, DJ, Tait, GW, Thomson, J, Caslake, MJ, Packard, CJ & Shepherd, J (1994) Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk. Atherosclerosis 106, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hokanson, J & Austin, MA (1996) Plasma mglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk 3, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, RW & Pometta, D (1991) The distribution profiles of very low density and low density lipoproteins in poorly-controlled male, Type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 34, 246–252.Google Scholar
Keys, A (1970) Coronary heart disease in seven countries. Circulation 41, Suppl. 1, I-186–I-198.Google Scholar
Millar, JS & Packard, CJ (1998) Heterogeneity of apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins: what we have learnt from kinetic studies. Current Opinion in Lipidology 9, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nigon, F, Lesnik, P, Rouis, M & Chapman, MJ (1991) Discrete subspecies of human low density lipoproteins are heterogeneous in their interaction with the cellular LDL receptor. Journal of Lipid Research 32, 1741–1753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordestgaard, BG & Nielsen, LB (1994) Atherosclerosis and arterial influx of lipoproteins. Current Opinion in Lipidology 5, 252–257.Google Scholar
Packard, CJ (1995) Lipid exchanges. Micro News 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group (1994) Randomized trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344, 383–389.Google Scholar
Shepherd, J, Cobbe, SM, Ford, I, Isles, CG, Lorimer, AR, MacFarlane, PW, McKillop, JH & Packard, CJ (1995) Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolaemia: West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. New England Journal of Medicine 333, 1301–1307.Google Scholar
Shepherd, J & Packard, CJ (1987) Metabolic heterogeneity in very low density lipoproteins. American Heart Journal 113, 503–508.Google Scholar
Smith, EB & Slater, RS (1972) Relationship between low-density lipoprotein in aortic intima and serum-lipid levels. Lancet i, 463–469.Google Scholar
Sniderman, A, Shapiro, S, Marpole, D, Skinner, B, Teng, B & Kwiterovich, PO (1980) Association of coronary atherosclerosis with hyperapobetalipoproteinemia (increased protein but normal cholesterol levels in human plasma low density (beta) lipoprotein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 77, 604–608.Google Scholar
Sniderman, AD, Cianflone, K, Arner, P, Summers, LKM & Frayn, KN (1998) The adipocyte, fatty acid trapping, and atherogenesis. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 18, 147–151.Google Scholar
Stamler, J, Wentworth, D & Neaton, JD (1986) Is the relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 256, 2823–2828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stampfer, MJ, Krauss, RM, Blanche, PJ, Holl, LG, Sacks, FM & Hennekens, CH (1996) A prospective study of triglyceride level, low density lipoprotein particle diameter, and risk of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association 276, 882–888.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D & Witztum, JL (1990) Lipoproteins and atherogenesis. Journal of the American Medical Association 264, 3047–3052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, CE, Forster, L, Caslake, MJ, Bedford, D, Watson, TDG, McConnell, M, Packard, CJ & Shepherd, J (1995) Relations between plasma lipids and postheparin plasma lipases and VLDL and LDL subfraction patterns in normolipemic men and women. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 15, 1839–1848.Google Scholar
Tribble, DL, Holl, LG, Wood, PD & Krauss, RM (1992) Variations in oxidative susceptibility among six low density lipoprotein subfractions of differing density and particle size. Atherosclerosis 93, 189–199.Google Scholar
Tribble, DL, Krauss, RM, Landsberg, MG, Thiel, PM & Berg, JM (1995) Greater oxidative susceptibility of the surface monolayer in small, dense LDL may contribute to differences in copper-induced oxidation among LDL subfractions. Journal of Lipid Research 36, 662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar