Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T08:53:57.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hierarchy and Power in Pre-National Buddhist States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Peter Vandergeest
Peter Vandergeest
Affiliation:
University of Victoria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the Second World War, an important school of social science scholarship in Southeast Asia has explained pre-national social hierarchy in terms of religious cosmology, or religious beliefs in the ordering principles of merit and karma (Heine-Geldern, 1956; Geertz, 1980; Errington, 1989). With respect to Siam/Thailand, Tambiah (1970, 1976, 1984) exemplifies this approach in its strong form—he has attempted to explain all religious practices of the ‘Thais’ as expressions of Buddhist orthodoxy. For these writers, religious and cosmological meaning is fundamental, and subsumes the economic dimension. Their emphasis on cultural coherence contrasts with a second school of thought exemplified by Scott (1977, 1985) which focuses on slippage or difference between the ‘great traditions’ represented in Thailand by Buddhism, and little traditions of peasantries, based on local experience, pre-existing little traditions or the appropriation of past ‘great traditions’.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 843 - 870
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1972. ‘The Idea of power in Javanese Culture’. In Holt, Claire (ed.), Culture and Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1978. ‘Studies of Thai State: The State of Thai Studies’. Pages 193–234 in Ayal, Eliezer B. (ed.), The Study of Thailand. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1988. ‘Putting Hierarchy in its Place’. Cultural Anthropology 3:36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Benjamin A. u.d. Sakdina Nationalism. Chulalongkorn university: Thailand Information center.Google Scholar
Boon, James A. 1983. ‘Incest Recaptured: Some Contraries of Karma in Balinese Symbology’. Pages 185–222 in Keyes and Daniel.Google Scholar
Chalermpow Koanantakool, Paritta. 1980. ‘A Popular Drama in its Social Context: Nang Talung, the Shadow Puppet Theatre of South Thailand’. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chalermpow Koanantakool, Paritta 1982. ‘Traditional and Modern Styles in Southern Thai Shadow Puppet Theatre’, Paper presented at the Second Thai–European Research Seminar, June 14–18, Saarbruecken, Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
Coedes, G. 1968. The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.Google Scholar
Diller, Anthony. 1987. ‘Syntactic Shifting as a Social Resource for Thai Speakers’. Paper presented for the Conference ‘The Role of Theory in Language Description’. Ocho Rios, Jamaica, October 31–November 8, 1987.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Errington, Shelly. 1989. Meaning and Power in a Southeast Asian Realm. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1980. Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Heine-Geldern, R. 1956. Conceptions of state and Kingship in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Data Paper no. 18, SE Asia Program, Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inden, Ronald. 1986. ‘Orientalist Constructions of India’. Modern Asian Studies 20(3): 401–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasetsiri, Charnvit. 1976. The Rise of Ayutthaya. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keeler, Ward. 1987. Javanese Shadowplays, Javanese Selves. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1983. ‘Merit-Transference in the Karmic Theory of Popular Theravada Buddhism’. Pages 261–86 in Keyes and Daniel (1983).Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1987a. Thailand: Buddhist Kingdom as Modern Nation-State. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keyes, Charles F. 1987b. ‘Theravada Buddhism and its Worldly Transformation in Thailand: Reflections on the work of S. J. Tambiah’. Contributions to Indian Sociology 21(1): 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Charles F., and Daniel, E. Valentine (eds). 1983. Karma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Thoamas A. 1977. ‘Complexity in the Thai Religious System: An Interpretation’. Journal of Asian Studies XXXVI(2): 241–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landon, Kenneth Perry. 1939. Siam in Transition. New York: Greenwood (1968 reprint); orginally published by University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rajadhon, Phya Anuman. 1968. Essay on Thai Folklore. Bangkok: Duang Kamol.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Craig J. 1973. ‘The Buddhist Monkhood in Nineteenth Century Thailand’. Ithaca, NY: Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Craig J. 1976. ‘Buddhist Cosmography in Thai History, with Special Reference to Nineteenth-Century Culture Change’ Journal of Asian Studies 35(2): 203–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Craig J. 1979. ‘Monastery Lands and Labour Endowsments in Thailand’. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient XXII(II): 190–227.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1977. ‘Protest and Profanation: Agrarian Revolt and the Little Tradition’. Theory and Society 4(1 and 2):1–38; 159–210.Google Scholar
Scott, James C.. 1985. Weapons of the Weak. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spiro, Melford E. 1982. Buddhism and Society (2nd edn). Berkeley: University of California Press (1st edn, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stargardt, Janice. 1983. Satingpra I: The Environmental and Economic Archaeology of South Thailand. Oxford, UK: BAR International Sereis 158.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. J. 1970. Buddhism and the Spirit Cults in North-East Thailand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. J.. 1976. World Conqueror and World Renouncer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambiah, S. J.. 1984. Buddhist Saints of the Forest and the Cult of the Amulets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, Nicola. 1987. ‘Tattoos: Invulnerability and Power in Shan Cosmology’. American Ethnologist 14:693–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terwiel, B. J. 1975. Monks and Magic. Bangkok: Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monographic Sereis.Google Scholar
Textor, Robert B. 1973. Roster of the Gods. New Haven: Human Relations File (HRAFlex Book A07–001).Google Scholar
Vandergeest, Peter. 1990. ‘Siam into Thailand’. Ithaca, NY: Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Vandergeest, Peter. 1992. ‘Constructing Thailand’. Forthcoming in Comparative Studies in Society and History.Google Scholar
Wyatt, David K. 1975. The Crystal Sands: The Chronicles of Nagara Si Dharmraya. Ithaca, NY: Data Paper no. 98, SE Asia Program, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Wyatt, David K. 1982. Thailand: A Short History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Yongyutha Chuvaen, . 1986. ‘The History of the Lake of Songkhla Region from the Beginning of the Seventeenth to the End of the Eighteenth Centuries’. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Silpakorn University, Bangkok.Google Scholar