Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T03:03:25.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The calls of gadoid fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. D. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, Scotland
Knud Just Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Laboratory, Helsingor, Denmark

Extract

Of nine northern European species of the Gadidae examined in the aquarium, or in cages in the sea, four produced sounds. The vocal species were the haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus (L.); the cod, Gadus morhua L.; the lythe, Pollachius pollachius (L.); and the tadpole-fish, Raniceps raninns (L.). The main differences between the calls of the vocal species lay in their temporal structure, all the calls being divisible into brief pulses of low frequency sound, repeated at different rates and in different groupings. Calls with this structure yielded spectra with a series of spaced harmonics, the frequency spacing depending upon the pulse repetition rate.

Sixteen additional species were dissected, and seven of these showed well developed muscles attached to the swimbladder, similar to those found in the four vocal species. The remaining nine species, together with the five non-vocal species examined in the aquarium, lacked the muscles.

The behavioural significance of the calls and the operation of the sound producing mechanism are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brawn, V. M., 1961. Sound production by the cod (Gadus callarias L.). Behaviour, 18, 239255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busnel, R. C., 1963. On certain aspects of animal acoustic signals. In Acoustic Behaviour of Animals (ed. Busnel, R. G.), pp. 5465. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Hawkins, A. D., 1973. A field study of hearing in the cod, Gadus morhua L. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 85, 147167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, H., 1956. Physical aspects of the sense organs. Progress in Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, 6, 207264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, G. A. & Winn, H. E., 1961. Reproductive ecology and sound production of the toadfish, Opsanus tau. Ecology, 42, 274282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagman, N., 1921. Studien über die Schwimmblase einiger Gadiden und Macruriden 1. Gestalt des Organes und Befestigung desselben binnen Leibeshöhle. 124 pp. Lund: Carl Bloms.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A. D. & Chapman, C. J., 1966. Underwater sounds of the haddock, Melanogrammus aeglefinus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46, 241247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, A. D., Chapman, C. J. & Symonds, D. J., 1967. Spawning of haddock in captivity. Nature, London, 215, 923925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, C. S., 1968. Relation between absolute threshold and duration of tone pulse in the bottlenosed porpoise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 43, 757763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, F. R. H. & Marshall, N. B., 1953. The structure and functions of the teleostean swimbladder. Biological Reviews, 28, 1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, R. A., 1935. Codfish in captivity. Progress Report of the Atlantic Biological Station, 16, 710.Google Scholar
MØhl, B., 1968. Auditory sensitivity of the common seal in air and water. Journal of Acoustic Research, 8, 2728.Google Scholar
Offutt, G. C., 1967. Integration of the energy in repeated tone pulses by man and the goldfish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41, 1319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parvulescu, A., 1964. Problems of propagation and processing. In Marine Bioacoustics (ed. Tavolga, W. N.), pp. 87100. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Poggendorf, D., 1952. The absolute auditory threshold of the dwarf catfish (Ameiurus rebulosus) and notes on the physics of the Weberian apparatus in the Ostariophysi. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie, 34, 222257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, A. N., 1972. Auditory threshold in the goldfish (Carassius auratus) as a function of signal duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 596602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand, O. & Hawkins, A. D., 1973. Acoustic properties of the cod swimbladder. Journal of Experimental Biology, 58, 797820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoglund, C. R., 1961. Functional analysis of swimbladder muscles engaged in sound production of the toadfish. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology, 10, 187200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sørensen, W., 1884. Om Lydorganer hos Fiske. En Physiologisk og Comparativ-anatomisk Undersøgelse. 245 pp. Copenhagen: Thaning.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavolga, W. N., 1958. The significance of underwater sounds produced by males of the gobiid fish, Bathygobius soporator. Physiological Zoölogy, 31, 259271.Google Scholar
Tavolga, W. N., 1962. Mechanisms of sound production in the ariid catfishes Galeichthys and Bagre. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 124, 130.Google Scholar
Templeman, W., & Hodder, V. M., 1958. Variation with fish length, sex, stage of sexual maturity and season, in the appearance and volume of the drumming muscles of the swimbladder in the haddock, Melanograrnmus aeglefinus L. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 15 355390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winn, H. E., 1972. Acoustic discrimination by the toadfish with comments on signal systems. In Behaviour of Marine Animals, vol. 2 (ed. Winn, H. E.), pp. 361385. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winn, H. E., Marshall, J. A. & Hazlett, B., 1964. Behaviour, diel activities and stimuli that elicit sound production and reactions to sounds in the longspine squirrelfish. Copeia, 1964, 413425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar