Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:50:10.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The morphometrics of cephalopod gills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. Clare Eno
N. Clare Eno
Affiliation:
Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough, PE1 1JY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The capacity for oxygen uptake of a respiratory organ can be estimated using morpho-metric techniques, the two essential measurements being respiratory surface-area and thickness of the tissue barrier across which oxygen diffuses. In cephalopods, the gills are the main site of respiratory exchange and this study was designed to estimate oxygen uptake capacity of the gills of four different genera of cephalopods. A preliminary study was required to determine the form and structure of the gills. Light microscopy showed the surface of the gills to be highly folded, particularly in Octopus. A level of microscopy was chosen at which the outline of the smallest folds of the epithelium and the blood vessels of the gills could be easily resolved. Stereological techniques were then employed to obtain values for the respiratory surface-area related to body weight (cm2 g-1), tissue barrier thickness (μm) and oxygen-diffusing capacity (ml O2 min1 Torr·1 kg1). Values for these three variables obtained for the different species were as follows: Octopus vulgaris 2·9 cm2 g-1, 10 μm, 0·05 ml O2 min-1 Torr-1 kg1; Alloteuthis subulata 10·6 cm2 g1,6 μm, 0·27 ml O2 min-1 Torr-1 kg-1; Nautilus sp. 4·9 cm2 g-1,15 μm, 0·05 ml O2 min-1 Torr1 kg-1; Sepia hatchlings 13·3 cm2 g-1, 4 μm, 0·52 ml O2 min-1 Torr-1 kg-1.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , August 1994 , pp. 687 - 706
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustyn, C.J., Lipinski, M.R. & Roeleveld, M.A., 1991. The distribution and abundance of Sepioidea off the coast of Southern Africa. In La Veiche: the cuttlefish. First International Symposium on the cuttlefish, Sepia (ed. E., Boucaud-Camou), p. 196. Caen: Centre de Publications de l'Université de Caen.Google Scholar
Bradbury, H.E., 1971. A technique for demonstrating the blood vascular system of a squid. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 49, 505–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eno, N.C., 1987. Functional morphology of cephalopod gills. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffin, L.E., 1900. The anatomy of Nautilus pompilius. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, 8, 103–230.Google Scholar
Gundersen, H.J.G., 1984. Stereology and sampling of biological surfaces. In Analysis of biological surfaces (ed. P., Echlin), pp. 477–506. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Houlihan, D.F., Duthie, G., Smith, P.J., Wells, M.J. & Wells, J., 1986. Ventilation and circulation during exercise in Octopus vulgaris. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 156B, 683–689.Google Scholar
Houlihan, D.F., Innes, A.J., Wells, M.J. & Wells, J., 1982. Oxygen consumption and blood gasses of Octopus vulgaris in hypoxic conditions. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 148B, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G.M., 1966. The dimensions of fish gills in relation to their function. Journal of Experimental Biology, 45, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, G.M., 1970. A comparative approach to fish respiration. Experientia, 26, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, G.M., 1982. An introduction to the study of gills. In Gills (ed. D.F., Houlihanet al.), pp. 1–24. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, G.M., 1984. Measurement of gill area: practices and problems. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 637–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G.M. & Gray, I.E., 1972. Dimensions and ultrastructure of toadfish gills. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 143, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G.M. & Perry, S.F., 1976. Morphometric study of trout gills: a light-microscopic method suitable for the evaluation of pollutant action. Journal of Experimental Biology, 64, 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isgrove, A., 1909. Eledone. LMBC Memoirs on Typical British Marine Plants and Animals, no. 18.Google Scholar
Joubin, L., 1885. La branchie des céphalopodes. Archive de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, série 2, 3, 75–150.Google Scholar
Joubin, L., 1890. Recherches sur l'appareil respiratoire des Nautiles. Revue Biologique, II, 409–428.Google Scholar
Owen, R., 1832. Memoir on the pearly nautilus (Nautilus pompilius, Linn.) with illustrations of its i external form and internal structure. London: Royal College of Surgeons.Google Scholar
Papaccio, G. & Pisanti, F. A., 1984. Scanning electron microscopy of the cephalopod gill: a vascular: cast study. Journal of Electron Microscopy, 33, 349–355.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1935. Essai d'éthologie zoologique d'après l'étude des mollusques. Académie Royale de Belgiques Classe des Sciences. Publications de la Fondation Agathon De Potter, 1, 1–662.Google Scholar
Robson, G.C., 1925. The deep-sea Octopoda. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 2, 1323–1356.Google Scholar
Saunders, W.B., 1981. The species of living Nautilus and their distribution. Veliger, 24, 8–17.Google Scholar
Schipp, R., Mollenhauer, S. & Boletzky, S. Von, 1979. Electron microscopical and histochemical i studies of differentiation and function of the cephalopod gill (Sepia officinalis). Zoomorphology, 93, 193–207.Google Scholar
Simionescu, N., Simionescu, M. & Palade, G.E., 1972. Permeability of intestinal capillaries. Pathway followed by dextrans and glycogens. Journal of Cell Biology, 53, 365–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tompsett, D.H., 1939. Sepia. LMBC Memoirs on Typical British Plants and Animals, vol. 32.Google Scholar
Vogel, S., 1981. Life in moving fluids: the physical biology of flow. Boston: Willard Grant Press.Google Scholar
Voss, G.L., 1967. The biology and bathymetric distribution of deep-sea cephalopods. Studies in Tropical Oceanography. Institute of Marine Science. Miami, 5, 511–535.Google Scholar
Weibel, E.R., 1963. Morphometry of the human lung. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Weibel, E.R., 1979. Stereological methods. Vol. 1. Practical methods for biological morphometry. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weibel, E.R. & Knight, B.W., 1964. A morphometric study on the thickness of the pulmonary air-blood barrier. Journal of Cell Biology, 21, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.J., O'dor, R.K., Mangold, K. & Wells, J., 1983a. Diurnal changes in activity and metabolic rate in Octopus vulgaris. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 9, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.J., O'dor, R.K., Mangold, K. & Wells, J., 1983b. Oxygen consumption in movement by Octopus. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 9, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.J., O'dor, R.K., Mangold, K. & Wells, J., 1983c. Feeding and metabolic rate in Octopus. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 9, 305–317.Google Scholar
Wells, M.J. & Smith, P.J., 1985. The ventilation cycle in Octopus. Journal of Experimental Biology, 116, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.J. & Wells, J., 1982. Ventilatory currents in the mantle of cephalopods. Journal of Experimental Biology, 99, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.J. & Wells, J., 1985. Ventilation and oxygen uptake by Nautilus. Journal of Experimental Biology, 118, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M.J., Wells, J. & O'dor, R.K., 1992. Life at low oxygen tensions: the behaviour and physiology of Nautilus pompilius and the biology of extinct forms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 313–328.Google Scholar