Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T05:10:18.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in the genus Fucus L. II. Distribution and ecology of forms of Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell in Britain and Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. T. Powell
H. T. Powell
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution and ecology of subspp. anceps and edentatus of F. distichus L. emend. Powell (1957) in Britain and Ireland is described in detail, based on recent ecological surveys and critical examination of all past records.

F. distichus anceps is a small form confined to certain very exposed coasts in the north and west of Scotland and Ireland, where it reaches the southern limit of its geographical range. This plant may be a relict form in Britain, existing now only under an extraordinarily narrow range of rigorous habitat conditions; it is not thought to be actively extending its range southwards at the present time. The ecology of subsp. anceps is considered principally in relation to that of other reduced fucoids found on exposed British shores, viz. F. spiralis f. nana and F. vesiculosus f. linearis; all three forms are illustrated by photographs and means of distinguishing them are described. The lifespan of subsp. ancepsis thought to be 2 to 3 years at some Irish sites, but may be longer at some of the Scottish sites.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , November 1957 , pp. 663 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admiralty, Hydrographic Department, 1956. The Admiralty Tide Tables, Vol. I, European Waters, 1957, London.Google Scholar
Batters, E. A. L., 1902. A catalogue of the British marine algae. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 40, Supplement, 107 pp.Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1902. Marine algae. Botany of the Faeröes, Part II, pp. 339–532, pis. XIII-XXIV. Copenhagen (1903). (Issued separately.)Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1903. The marine algae of the Shetlands. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. 41, pp. 300–6.Google Scholar
Börgesen, F., 1905. The algae-vegetation of the Faeröese coasts, with remarks on the phyto-geography. Botany of the Faeröes, Part III, pp. 683–834. Copenhagen (1908). (Issued separately.)Google Scholar
Burrows, E. M., Conway, E., Lodge, S. M. & Powell, H. T., 1954. The raising of intertidal algal zones on Fair Isle. J. Ecol., Vol. 42, pp. 283–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, W., 1863. Fucus distichus Linn, as an Irish plant. J. Bot., Lond., Vol. I, PP. 353–5, Pl. 12.Google Scholar
Cotton, A. D., 1912. Clare Island Survey: Marine Algae. Proc. R. Irish Acad., Vol. 31, Part 15, 178 pp., 11 pls.Google Scholar
Daubenmire, R. F., 1947. Plants and Environment. A Textbook of Plant Autecology. xiii, 424 pp. New York and London.Google Scholar
Gauld, D. T., Bagenal, T. B. & Connell, J. H., 1953. The marine fauna and flora of St Kilda, 1952. Scot. Nat., Vol. 65, pp. 29–49.Google Scholar
Gause, G. F., 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillham, M. E., 1954. The marine algae of Skokholm and Grassholm Islands, Pembrokeshire. Northw. Nat., Vol. 25, pp. 204–25, pls. 3–5.Google Scholar
Harvey, L. A., 1950. The granite shores of Lundy. Ann. Rep. Lundy Field Soc, Year 4 (1950), pp. 34–44, 1 plGoogle Scholar
Hudson, W., 1762. Flora Anglica. xv, 506 pp. London.Google Scholar
Hylmö, D. E., 1933. Algenimmigration nach der schwedischen Westküste. Bot. Notiser, 1933, pp. 377–90.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1954. The ecology of exposed rocky shores of Caithness. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 62, pp. 695–723, 4 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1955 The mode of occurrence of the universal intertidal zones in Great Britain. J. Ecol, Vol. 43, pp. 270–90.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J., 1777. Flora Scotica. 2 Vols. London.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1949a. Nye Alger for de danske Farvande. (With summary in English.) Bot. Tidsskr., Bd. 48, Hft. 3, pp. 231–53.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1949&. Immigration of algae into Danish waters. Nature, Lond., Vol. 164, p. 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds, xiii, 478 pp. London.Google Scholar
Powell, H. T., 1957. Studies in the genus Fucus L. I. Fucus distichus L. emend. Powell. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 407–32.Google Scholar
Powell, H. T. & Lewis, J. R., 1952. Occurrence of Fucus inflatus L. forma distichus (L.) Börgesen on the north coast of Scotland. Nature, Lond., Vol. 169, p. 508.Google Scholar
Traill, G. W., 1885. A Monograph of the Algae of the Firth of Forth. 17 pp. and 4 pp. of mounted algae. Edinburgh.Google Scholar