Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:27:30.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Smallpox in Tripolitania, 1946: an epidemiological and clinical study of 500 cases, including trials of penicillin treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. W. Dixon
Affiliation:
From the Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Leeds
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The field epidemiology is described of two epidemics of smallpox which occurred in Tripolitania during 1946.

2. Control was effected by the ‘expanding ring’ method instead of mass vaccination of the population.

3. Five hundred cases were admitted to hospital and statistics are given of mortality in relation to age, sex and vaccination state.

4. A new clinical classification is described which enables a reliable prognosis to be made and provides a guide to treatment.

5. Controlled experiments were made on the use of penicillin in treatment. Although it is without effect on the viraemia and in general does not significantly affect mortality, it has the power of suppressing suppuration and reducing the effect of secondary sepsis. It also minimizes the amount of permanent scarring of the skin.

6. Evidence is presented to show that the period of maximum infectivity is the stage of the pre-eruptive fever. The mildest cases are infectious, but only for a short time.

The virus contained in dried scabs is not considered to be an important source of infection; it may, be modified in some way by passage through the skin.

7. Although not protected by successful vaccination many contacts showed a considerable resistance to infection. Amongst the older people this may have been due to previous clinical or subclinical attacks. Amongst the younger persons evidence is produced to show that many were relatively refractory to vaccination and experienced the disease in a different way, suggesting that there is natural partial immunity to smallpox in this particular population.

8. The complex problem of immunity in smallpox is discussed, and it is suggested that three factors operate, an anti-invasion factor, an anti-dissemination factor and a local skin immunity mechanism. A photograph is given of a model made to show the interaction of these three factors in producing the immunity levels which determine the type of disease. It also accounts for the immunity reactions in vaccinia and in smallpox in the vaccinated subject, both when vaccinated successfully during the incubation period of smallpox and when vaccinated successfully some time prior to contact.

It was perhaps unfortunate that this work had to be done under Service conditions without access to literature such as Ricketts & Byles's (1908) classic The Diagnosis of Smallpox, or Marsden's works, particularly his review of vaccination (1946). The lack of authoritative guidance, however, was compensated for by the enthusiasm of all concerned.

I am especially grateful to Lt.-Col. W. McN. Graves-Morris, R.A.M.C., P.M.O. Tripolitania, for allowing me the opportunity to experiment and to use such a large proportion of the territory's supply of penicillin.

I am indebted to Col. W. W. Sharpe, R.A.M.C., D.D.H., M.E.L.F., for enabling me to return to Tripolitania for a short time to complete the records, and to Capt. J. Macbeth, R.A.M.C., Capt. W. L. Forbes, R.A.M.C., Capt. J. Anderson, R.A.M.C. and the late Capt. J. LaFerla, R.A.M.C, who assisted at different stages and in different ways.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

References

REFERENCES

Boeck, V. H. F. (1946). Smallpox amongst U.S. soldiers in Korea. Bull. U.S. Army Med. Dep. 6, 4558.Google Scholar
Boul, W. T. G. & Corfield, W. F. (1946). Smallpox and vaccination. Lancet, 2, 284–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, M. F. (1945). Preventive Medicine, 7th ed.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1945). Virus as Organism. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1946). The Background of Infectious Diseases in Man. Melbourne: Brown Prior Anderson Ltd.Google Scholar
Clark, (1944). The Edinburgh Outbreak of Smallpox, 1942. Published by the City of Edinburgh Public Health Department.Google Scholar
Downie, A. W. (1947). Value of laboratory tests in diagnosis of smallpox. Pub. Hth, Lond., 60, 82–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downie, A. W. & Dumbell, K. R. (1947). Survival of variola virus in dead exudate and crusts from smallpox patients. Lancet, 1, 550–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, A. L. (1942). Some statistical notes on vaccination. Glas. Med. J. 138, 143–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Harries, & Mitman, (1947). Manual of Infectious Diseases, 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Livingstone.Google Scholar
Horgan, E. S. & Haseeb, M. A. (1944). Some observations on accidental vaccination on hands of workers in a vaccine lymph institute. J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 273–4.Google Scholar
Ker, C. B. (1939). Manual of Fevers. Oxford Medical Publications, no. 126.Google Scholar
Marsden, J. P. (1946). Vaccination against smallpox: critical review of present position. Bull. Hyg., Lond., 21, 555–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Ricketts, T. F. & Byles, J. B. (1908). Diagnosis of Smallpox. Cassell and Co.Google Scholar
Top, F. H. & Peck, L. E. (1943). Small outbreak of smallpox in Detroit. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth, 33, 490–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Rooyen, C. E. & Illingworth, R. S. (1944). Laboratory test for diagnosis of smallpox. Brit. Med. J. 2, 526–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, P. B. (1942). Sulphanilamide in treatment of smallpox: review of 103 cases. Lancet, 2, 67–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar