Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T04:55:49.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Profitability of Serfdom: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Evsey D. Domar  and
Mark J. Machina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In discussing Catherine II's proficiency in the Russian language, the historian Kliuchevaskii remarked that “she could make four mistakes in spelling a Russian word consisting of three letters.” According to Peter Toumanoff, we have performed a similar feat by making no fewer than five major mistakes in a single paper.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 960 - 962
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kliuchevskii, V., Kurs russkoi istorii [A course in Russian history] (Moscow, 1937), vol. 5, p. 15. The word in question was “eshche” (“shch” is a single letter in Russian) which she spelled “ischo.”Google Scholar

2 In our notation, F(L s, T s) is per capita output on the serfs' part of the estate and RL and RT are the marginal products of the per capita labor and land inputs L s and T s, which are measured in hours and desiatinas, respectively.Google Scholar