Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:20:41.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GENDER INEQUALITY INCREASES WOMEN’S RISK OF HIV INFECTION IN MOSHI, TANZANIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

ZHIHONG SA
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, USA
ULLA LARSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, USA

Summary

This study examined the hypothesis that multiple dimensions of gender inequality increase women’s risk for HIV infection using a population-based survey of 1418 women aged 20 to 44 in Moshi, Tanzania. Three forms of HIV exposures were assessed reflecting gender power imbalance: economic exposures (age difference between partners and partner’s contributions to children’s expenses), physical exposures (coerced first sex and intimate partner violence) and social exposures (ever had problems conceiving). Behavioural risk factors included number of sexual partners for women in the last three years, partner had other wives or girlfriends, non-use of condom and alcohol use at least once a week in the last 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a woman had a significantly elevated risk for HIV if she had a partner more than 10 years older (OR=2·5), her partner made low financial contributions to children’s expenses (OR=1·7), or she experienced coerced first sex before age 18 years (OR=2·0) even after taking into account the effects of risk behaviour factors. The association between ever had problem conceiving and HIV infection was explained away by risk behaviour factors. The findings lend support to the hypothesis that economic deprivation and experience of sexual violence increase women’s vulnerability to HIV, providing further evidence for extending the behavioural approach to HIV interventions to incorporate women’s economic empowerment, elimination of gender-based violence and promotion of changing attitudes and behaviours among men.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)