Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:48:41.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The zygosity of twins: further evidence on the agreement between diagnosis by blood groups and written questionnaires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Judith Kasriel  and
Lindon Eaves
Judith Kasriel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
Lindon Eaves
Affiliation:
Department of Genetics, University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The agreement between zygosity diagnosis in twins by reference to the twins' own answers to written questions and diagnosis based on an objective assessment of zygosity by blood-typing is studied for 178 pairs of same sex twins. Seventy-two female and 106 male twin pairs answered two questions concerning their similarity in appearance and frequency of confusion in childhood, and were blood-grouped using up to 23 different antisera. Of those pairs concordant for all markers and diagnosed as MZ, 98% agreed that they were confused in childhood and that they are alike in physical appearance. Only 55% of those pairs discordant for at least one marker and classified as DZ agreed that they were never confused and are not alike in appearance. The replies of the remaining 45% are spread over all the other combinations of responses. If all twins who agree that they were confused in childhood and are alike in appearance were to be classified as MZ on the basis of the questionnaire alone, and all others as DZ, the diagnoses of only seven pairs out of the total 178 (3–9%) would disagree with those based on blood group data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 1976 , pp. 263 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © 1976, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cederlöof, R., Friberg, L., Jonsson, E. & Kaij, L. (1961) Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaire. Ada genet. Basel. 11, 338.Google Scholar
Cohen, D.J., Dibble, E., Grawe, J.M. &Pollin, W. (1973) Separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 29, 465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, D.J., Dibble, E., Grawe, J.M. & Pollin, W. (1975) Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch. gen. Psychiat. 32, 1371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essen-Moller, E. (1941) Empirische ahnlichkeits-diagnose bei zwillingen. Hereditas (Lund), 27, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husen, T. (1959) Psychological Twin Research. Almquist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Martin, N.G. &Martin, P.G. (1975) The inheritance of scholastic abilities in a sample of twins. I. Ascertainment of the sample and diagnosis of zygosity. Ann. hum. Genet. 39, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.M. &Penrose, L.S. (1955) Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann. hum.Genet. 19, 273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, R.C. & Bilbro, W.C. Jr (1966) The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta. gemt. Basel. 16, 265.Google ScholarPubMed