Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:36:28.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes of sugars, β-carotene and firmness of refrigerated Ataulfo mangoes treated with exogenous ethylene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

E. MONTALVO
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Investigación de Alimentos, Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Apdo. Postal 634, Tepic, Nayarit, México UNIDA, Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, M.A. de Quevedo 2779, Veracruz, Ver. 91897, México
Y. ADAME
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Investigación de Alimentos, Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Apdo. Postal 634, Tepic, Nayarit, México
H. S. GARCÍA
Affiliation:
UNIDA, Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz, M.A. de Quevedo 2779, Veracruz, Ver. 91897, México
B. TOVAR
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Investigación de Alimentos, Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Apdo. Postal 634, Tepic, Nayarit, México
M. MATA*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Investigación de Alimentos, Instituto Tecnológico de Tepic, Apdo. Postal 634, Tepic, Nayarit, México
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: mmata@tepic.megared.net.mx

Summary

The export of Ataulfo mangoes to the US market involves a mandatory hot water treatment and further handling at 13°C for 4 days. These treatments have proven to adversely affect fruit ripening, mainly in colour and flavour development, and their nutritional quality. The application of exogenous ethylene (100 μl/l of air for 12 h at 25°C) to Ataulfo mangoes that were treated with hot water after storage for 4 days at 13°C, and then transferred to 25°C for ripening, was evaluated. Sugar content, colour development and textural firmness were monitored. Control fruit were held at 25°C with no previous refrigeration or ethylene exposure; another batch was kept refrigerated for 4 days at 13°C, not treated with ethylene and ripened at 25°C. Synthesis of fructose (30 g/kg fresh weight (FW)), glucose (38 g/kg FW), sucrose (120 g/kg FW) and β-carotene (0·026 g/kg FW) in the last day of storage was greater in fruits treated with ethylene than on refrigerated mangoes (RM). Loss of firmness (9·3 Newtons) coincided with the highest pectinmethylesterase and polygalacturonase activities, 53·24 and 37·92 U/mg protein, respectively, and eventually led to collapse of cell structure. Results suggest that sugars and carotenoid content can be increased, along with an accelerated ripening by application of exogenous ethylene on mangoes that were refrigerated for 4 days.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AOAC (1984). Official Methods of Analysis, 14th edn.Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bradford, M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248254.Google Scholar
Britton, G. & Hornero-Méndez, D. (1997). Carotenoids and colour en fruit and vegetables. In Phytochemistry of Fruit and Vegetables (Ed.Tomás-Barberán, F. A.), pp. 111127. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cano, M. P. & De Ancos, B. (1994). Carotenoid and carotenoid ester composition in mango fruit as influenced by processing method. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 42, 27372742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhaptar, H. S., Mattoo, A. K. & Modi, V. V. (1971). Biochemical studies on chilling injury in mangoes. Phytochemistry 10, 10071009.Google Scholar
EMEX (1998). Exportación de mango Mexicano. Norma de calidad para mango fresco de exportación. Elaborada por Baéz-Sañudo R, Bringas E, Ojeda J, Cruz L, Ontiveros S, Pellegrin J. Boletín CIAD, A.C. Hermosillo, México, pp. 67.Google Scholar
Faulks, R. M. & Southon, S. (2001). Carotenoids, metabolism and disease. In Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods (Ed.Wildman, R. E. C.), pp. 143156. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hagerman, A. E. & Austin, P. J. (1986). Continuous spectrophotometric assay for plant pectin methyl esterase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 34, 440444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L. N., Bird, C. R., Picton, S., Tucker, G., Seymor, G. B. & Grierson, D. (1994). Molecular characterization of cDNA clones representing pectin esterase isozymes from tomato. Plant Molecular Biology 25, 313318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbard, N. L., Pharr, D. M. & Huber, S. C. (1990). Role of sucrose phosphate synthase in sucrose biosynthesis in ripening bananas and its relationship to the respiratory climacteric. Plant Physiology 94, 201208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imsabai, W., Ketsa, S. & Van Doorn, W. G. (2002). Effect of temperature on softening and the activities of polygalacturonase and pectinesterase in durian fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 26, 347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazan, H., Selamat, M. K. & Ali, Z. M. (1995). β-galactosidase, polygalacturonase and pectinesterase in differential softening and cell wall modification during papaya fruit ripening. Plant Physiology 95, 106112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizada, C. (1993). Mango. In Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening (EdsSeymour, G. B., Taylor, J. E. & Tucker, G. A.), pp. 253271. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Medlicott, A. P., Sigrist, J. M. M. & Sy, O. (1990). Ripening of mangoes following low-temperature storage. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 115, 430434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medlicott, A. P. & Thompson, A. K. (1985). Analysis of sugars and organic acids in ripening mango fruits (Mangifera indica L. var Keitt) by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of the Science Food and Agriculture 36, 561566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercadante, Z. A. & Rodriguez-Amaya, D. B. (1998). Effects of ripening, cultivar differences, and processing on the carotenoid composition of mango. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46, 128130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mir, N. & Beaudry, R. (2002). Atmosphere control using oxygen and carbon dioxide. In Fruit Quality and its Biological Basis (Ed.Knee, M.), pp. 122156. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Montalvo, E., Garcia, H. S., Tovar, B. & Mata, M. (2007). Application of exogenous ethylene on postharvest ripening of refrigerated Ataulfo mangoes. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie 40, 14661472.Google Scholar
Mustilli, A. C., Fenzi, F., Ciliento, R., Alfano, F. & Bowler, C. (1999). Phenotype of the tomato high pigment-2 mutant is caused by a mutation in tomato homolog of DEETIOLATED1. Plant Cell 11, 145157.Google Scholar
Parikh, H. R., Nair, G. M. & Modi, V. V. (1990). Some structural changes during ripening of mangoes (Mangifera indica var. Alphonso) by abscisic acid treatment. Annals of Botany 65, 121127.Google Scholar
Sane, V. A., Chourasia, A. & Nath, P. (2005). Softening in mango (Mangifera indica cv. Dashehari) is correlated with the expression of an early ethylene responsive, ripening related expansin gene, MiExpA1. Postharvest Biology and Technology 38, 223230.Google Scholar
Selvaraj, Y., Kumar, R. & Pal, D. K. (1989). Changes in sugar, organic acids, aminoacids, lipids constituents and aroma characteristic of ripening mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit. Journal of Food Science and Technology 26, 308313.Google Scholar
Sergent, E., Schaffer, B., Lara, S. P. & Leah, E. W. (1993). Effect of ethephon on mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit quality. Acta Horticulturae 341, 510517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitrit, Y. & Bennett, A. B. (1998). Regulation of tomato fruit polygalacturonase mRNA accumulation by ethylene: a re-examination. Plant Physiology 116, 11451150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamora, E., García, H. S., Mata, M. & Tovar, B. (2004). Ripening enhancement of refrigerated ‘Kent’ mango. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 27, 359366.Google Scholar
Zora, S. & Janes, J. (2001). Effects of postharvest application of ethephon on fruit ripening, quality and shelf life of mango under modified atmosphere packaging. Acta Horticulturae 553, 599602.Google Scholar