Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T19:45:47.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engineering Social Peace: Networks, Ideas, and the Founding of the International Labour Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2005

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1919 a pioneering generation of scholars, social policy experts, and politicians designed an unprecedented international organizational framework for labour politics. The majority of the founding fathers of this new institution, the International Labour Organization (ILO), had made great strides in social thought and action before 1919. The core members all knew one another from earlier private professional and ideological networks, where they exchanged knowledge, experiences, and ideas on social policy. In this study, one key question is the extent to which prewar “epistemic communities”, such as the International Association for Labour Legislation (IALL), and political networks, such as the Second International, were a decisive factor in the institutionalization of international labour politics. In the postwar euphoria, the idea of a “makeable society” was an important catalyst behind the social engineering of the ILO architects. As a new discipline, international labour law became a useful instrument for putting social reforms into practice. This article also deals with how the utopian idea(l)s of the founding fathers – social justice and the right to decent work – were changed by diplomatic and political compromises made at the Paris Peace Conference. The article thus reflects the dual relationship between idealism and pragmatism.

Type
ARTICLE
Copyright
© 2005 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis

Footnotes

This article was written as part of a Ph.D. project on “Social Dynamics in International Organizations and the Role of Small Nations: The Case of Belgium in the ILO (1919–1947)”. This project, which will be finished in early 2006, is being carried out under the auspices of the Department of Contemporary History of Ghent University (Belgium) and financed by the Fund of Scientific Research – Flanders. With special thanks to Herman Balthazar, Gita Deneckere, Dirk Luyten, Bob Reinalda, Fiona Rolian, and the anonymous referees for this journal for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this article.